Abdulla Alabbasi Ahmed M, Reiter-Palmon Roni, Sultan Zainab M, Ayoub Alaa Eldin A
Department of Gifted Education, Arabian Gulf University, Manama, Bahrain.
Department of Psychology, University of Nebraska Omaha, Omaha, NE, United States.
Front Psychol. 2021 Jul 22;12:671146. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.671146. eCollection 2021.
Problem finding (PF) and divergent thinking (DT) are considered to be indicators of creative potential. Previous studies, with different goals, suggest a positive correlation between PF and DT. However, none of these works have explicitly examined which index of DT is more associated with PF. The current investigation examined the association between PF and three main indexes of DT: fluency, flexibility, and originality. It also tested whether such a relation differs based on task nature (verbal vs. figural). The sample consisted of 90 sixth graders who completed three tests: (a) a verbal DT test, (b) a figural DT test, and (c) a PF test. Correlational analysis showed that flexibility was highly correlated with PF in the verbal DT test, whereas originality was significantly correlated with PF in the figural test. Results of the path analysis confirmed the results from correlational analyses and showed that verbal flexibility strongly predicted PF fluency, flexibility, and originality more than any other variable. Likelihood ratio test showed that using 1 or 3% cutoff for scoring originality did not significantly altered the results in both figural and verbal DT (vs. PF), while the likelihood ratio test showed significant differences between the figural and verbal DT. Finally, predictor variables in the verbal DT accounted for 40-58% of the variance in PF skills, whereas predictor variables in the figural DT accounted for 28-37% of the variance in PF skills. As suggested by experts in the field of PF, the role of flexibility in PF is a fertile area to be considered in future studies.
问题发现(PF)和发散性思维(DT)被认为是创造性潜力的指标。以往目标各异的研究表明PF和DT之间存在正相关。然而,这些研究均未明确考察DT的哪个指标与PF的关联更强。本调查研究了PF与DT的三个主要指标:流畅性、灵活性和独创性之间的关联。研究还检验了这种关系是否因任务性质(言语任务与图形任务)而异。样本由90名六年级学生组成,他们完成了三项测试:(a)言语DT测试,(b)图形DT测试,以及(c)PF测试。相关分析表明,在言语DT测试中灵活性与PF高度相关,而在图形测试中独创性与PF显著相关。路径分析结果证实了相关分析的结果,表明言语灵活性比其他任何变量都更能有力地预测PF的流畅性、灵活性和独创性。似然比检验表明,对独创性评分采用1%或3%的临界值并不会显著改变图形和言语DT(与PF相比)的结果,而似然比检验表明图形和言语DT之间存在显著差异。最后,言语DT中的预测变量占PF技能方差的40 - 58%,而图形DT中的预测变量占PF技能方差的28 - 37%。正如PF领域专家所指出的,灵活性在PF中的作用是未来研究中值得考虑的一个丰富领域。