Suppr超能文献

睡眠门诊人群中评估柏林问卷对睡眠呼吸暂停风险的有效性

Evaluation of Berlin Questionnaire Validity for Sleep Apnea Risk in Sleep Clinic Populations.

作者信息

Khaledi-Paveh Behnam, Khazaie Habibolah, Nasouri Marzie, Ghadami Mohammad Rasoul, Tahmasian Masoud

机构信息

Sleep Disorders Research Center, School of Medicine, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran.

Sleep Disorders Research Center, School of Medicine, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran.; Department of Neurology, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.

出版信息

Basic Clin Neurosci. 2016 Jan;7(1):43-8.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The Berlin questionnaire (BQ) is a common tool to screen for Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA) in the general population, but its application in the clinical sleep setting is still challenging. The aim of this study was to determine the specificity and sensitivity of the BQ compared to the apnea-hypopnea index obtained from polysomnography recordings obtained from a sleep clinic in Iran.

METHODS

We recruited 100 patients who were referred to the Sleep Disorders Research Center of Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences for the evaluation of suspected sleep-disorder breathing difficulties. Patients completed a Persian version of BQ and underwent one night of PSG. For each patient, Apnea-Hypopnea Index (AHI) was calculated to assess the diagnosis and severity of OSA. Severity of OSA was categorized as mild when AHI was between 5 and 15, moderate when it was between 15 and 30, and severe when it was more than 30.

RESULTS

BQ results categorized 65% of our patients as high risk and 35% as low risk for OSA. The sensitivity and the specificity of BQ for OSA diagnosis with AHI>5 were 77.3% and 23.1%, respectively. Positive predictive value was 68.0% and negative predictive value was 22.0%. Moreover, the area under curve was 0.53 (95% CI: 0.49 - 0.67, P=0.38).

DISCUSSION

Our findings suggested that BQ, despite its advantages in the general population, is not a precise tool to determine the risk of sleep apnea in the clinical setting, particularly in the sleep clinic population.

摘要

引言

柏林问卷(BQ)是在普通人群中筛查阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)的常用工具,但其在临床睡眠环境中的应用仍具有挑战性。本研究的目的是确定与从伊朗一家睡眠诊所的多导睡眠图记录中获得的呼吸暂停低通气指数相比,BQ的特异性和敏感性。

方法

我们招募了100名因疑似睡眠呼吸障碍而被转诊至克尔曼沙赫医科大学睡眠障碍研究中心进行评估的患者。患者完成了波斯语版的BQ,并接受了一晚的多导睡眠图检查。为每位患者计算呼吸暂停低通气指数(AHI),以评估OSA的诊断和严重程度。当AHI在5至15之间时,OSA严重程度分类为轻度;当AHI在15至30之间时,为中度;当AHI超过30时,为重度。

结果

BQ结果将我们65%的患者归类为OSA高风险,35%归类为低风险。对于AHI>5的OSA诊断,BQ的敏感性和特异性分别为77.3%和23.1%。阳性预测值为68.0%,阴性预测值为22.0%。此外,曲线下面积为0.53(95%CI:0.49 - 0.67,P = 0.38)。

讨论

我们的研究结果表明,尽管BQ在普通人群中有优势,但它不是在临床环境中,特别是在睡眠诊所人群中确定睡眠呼吸暂停风险的精确工具。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b850/4892329/5ecc02a207b0/BCN-7-43-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验