• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

亚洲人健康伙伴关系:采用以市场为导向的多层次方法,在亚裔美国人社区传播循证实践。

Partnership for Healthier Asians: Disseminating Evidence-Based Practices in Asian-American Communities Using a Market-Oriented and Multilevel Approach.

作者信息

Kim Karen, Quinn Michael, Chandrasekar Edwin, Patel Reena, Lam Helen

机构信息

The University of Chicago, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chicago, IL, United States.

出版信息

JMIR Res Protoc. 2016 Jun 16;5(2):e123. doi: 10.2196/resprot.5625.

DOI:10.2196/resprot.5625
PMID:27312079
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4929346/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

One of the greatest challenges facing health promotion and disease prevention is translating research findings into evidence-based practices (EBP). There is currently a limited research base to inform the design of dissemination action plans, especially within medically underserved communities.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this paper is to describe an innovative study protocol to disseminate colorectal cancer (CRC) screening guidelines in seven Asian subgroups.

METHODS

This study integrated a market-oriented Push-Pull-Infrastructure Model, Diffusion of Innovation Theory, and community-based participatory research approach to create a community-centered dissemination framework. Consumer research, through focus groups and community-wide surveys, was centered on the adopters to ensure a multilevel intervention was well designed and effective.

RESULTS

Collaboration took place between an academic institution and eight community-based organizations. These groups worked together to conduct thorough consumer research. A sample of 72 Asian Americans participated in 8 focus groups, and differences were noted across ethnic groups. Furthermore, 464 community members participated in an Individual Client Survey. Most participants agreed that early detection of cancer was important (434/464, 93.5%), cancer could happen to anyone (403/464, 86.9%), CRC could be prevented (344/464, 74.1%), and everyone should screen for CRC (389/464, 83.8%). However, 35.8% (166/464) of participants also felt that people were better off not knowing it they had cancer, and 45.5% (211/464) would screen only when they had symptoms. Most participants indicated that they would screen upon their doctor's recommendation, but half reported that they only saw a doctor when they were sick. Data collection currently is underway for a multilevel intervention (community health advisor and social marketing campaign) and will conclude March 2016. We expect that analysis and results will be available by June 2016.

CONCLUSIONS

This study outlines a complementary role for researchers and community organizations in disseminating EBP, and incorporates social interactions and influences to move individuals from simple awareness to decisions towards positive action.

摘要

背景

健康促进和疾病预防面临的最大挑战之一是将研究成果转化为循证实践(EBP)。目前,用于指导传播行动计划设计的研究基础有限,尤其是在医疗服务不足的社区。

目的

本文的目的是描述一项在七个亚洲亚群体中传播结直肠癌(CRC)筛查指南的创新研究方案。

方法

本研究整合了以市场为导向的推-拉-基础设施模型、创新扩散理论和基于社区的参与性研究方法,以创建一个以社区为中心的传播框架。通过焦点小组和全社区调查进行的消费者研究以采用者为中心,以确保多层次干预设计良好且有效。

结果

一所学术机构与八个社区组织开展了合作。这些团体共同努力进行了全面的消费者研究。72名亚裔美国人参与了8个焦点小组,不同种族群体之间存在差异。此外,464名社区成员参与了个人客户调查。大多数参与者认为癌症的早期检测很重要(434/464,93.5%),癌症可能发生在任何人身上(403/464,86.9%),结直肠癌可以预防(344/464,74.1%),每个人都应该进行结直肠癌筛查(389/464,83.8%)。然而,35.8%(166/464)的参与者也认为人们不知道自己患有癌症会更好,45.5%(211/464)的人只有在出现症状时才会进行筛查。大多数参与者表示他们会根据医生的建议进行筛查,但一半的人报告说他们只有在生病时才去看医生。目前正在进行多层次干预(社区健康顾问和社会营销活动)的数据收集,将于2016年3月结束。我们预计分析和结果将于2016年6月可得。

结论

本研究概述了研究人员和社区组织在传播循证实践中的补充作用,并纳入社会互动和影响,以使个人从单纯的认知转向做出积极行动的决策。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8878/4929346/07f1ca62c55b/resprot_v5i2e123_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8878/4929346/07f1ca62c55b/resprot_v5i2e123_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8878/4929346/07f1ca62c55b/resprot_v5i2e123_fig1.jpg

相似文献

1
Partnership for Healthier Asians: Disseminating Evidence-Based Practices in Asian-American Communities Using a Market-Oriented and Multilevel Approach.亚洲人健康伙伴关系:采用以市场为导向的多层次方法,在亚裔美国人社区传播循证实践。
JMIR Res Protoc. 2016 Jun 16;5(2):e123. doi: 10.2196/resprot.5625.
2
Promoting and supporting self-management for adults living in the community with physical chronic illness: A systematic review of the effectiveness and meaningfulness of the patient-practitioner encounter.促进和支持社区中患有慢性身体疾病的成年人进行自我管理:对医患互动的有效性和意义的系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(13):492-582. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907130-00001.
3
Community readiness assessment for obesity research: pilot implementation of the Healthier Families programme.社区肥胖研究准备度评估:健康家庭计划的试点实施。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2018 Jan 15;16(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s12961-017-0262-0.
4
The Effectiveness of Integrated Care Pathways for Adults and Children in Health Care Settings: A Systematic Review.综合护理路径在医疗环境中对成人和儿童的有效性:一项系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(3):80-129. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907030-00001.
5
Bridging the divide: building infrastructure to support community-academic partnerships and improve capacity to conduct patient-centered outcomes research.弥合差距:构建基础设施以支持社区 - 学术伙伴关系并提高开展以患者为中心的结局研究的能力。
Transl Behav Med. 2017 Dec;7(4):773-782. doi: 10.1007/s13142-017-0487-z.
6
Working on Womanhood (WOW): A participatory formative evaluation of a community-developed intervention.致力于女性特质(WOW):对一项社区开发干预措施的参与式形成性评估
Eval Program Plann. 2019 Feb;72:237-249. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2018.10.007. Epub 2018 Oct 6.
7
Reducing Liver Cancer Risk through Dietary Change: Positive Results from a Community-Based Educational Initiative in Three Racial/Ethnic Groups.通过饮食改变降低肝癌风险:在三个不同种族/民族群体中开展社区教育活动的积极成果。
Nutrients. 2022 Nov 18;14(22):4878. doi: 10.3390/nu14224878.
8
Palliative care experiences of adult cancer patients from ethnocultural groups: a qualitative systematic review protocol.不同种族文化群体成年癌症患者的姑息治疗体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):99-111. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1809.
9
Partnering with Indigenous student co-researchers: improving research processes and outcomes.与原住民学生共同研究者合作:改善研究过程与成果。
Int J Circumpolar Health. 2015 Jul 27;74:27838. doi: 10.3402/ijch.v74.27838. eCollection 2015.
10
Tuberculosis结核病

本文引用的文献

1
Dissemination as Dialogue: Building Trust and Sharing Research Findings Through Community Engagement.作为对话的传播:通过社区参与建立信任并分享研究成果。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2016 Mar 17;13:E38. doi: 10.5888/pcd13.150473.
2
A "Community Fit" Community-Based Participatory Research Program for Family Health, Happiness, and Harmony: Design and Implementation.一项以社区为基础的“社区健康适配”家庭健康、幸福与和谐参与式研究计划:设计与实施
JMIR Res Protoc. 2015 Oct 28;4(4):e126. doi: 10.2196/resprot.4369.
3
Challenges in meeting Healthy People 2020 objectives for cancer-related preventive services, National Health Interview Survey, 2008 and 2010.
2008 年和 2010 年全国健康访谈调查:实现《2020 年健康人》癌症相关预防服务目标的挑战。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2014 Feb 27;11:E29. doi: 10.5888/pcd11.130174.
4
Differences in knowledge, attitudes, beliefs, and perceived risks regarding colorectal cancer screening among Chinese, Korean, and Vietnamese sub-groups.中国、韩国和越南少数群体在结直肠癌筛查方面的知识、态度、信念和感知风险的差异。
J Community Health. 2014 Apr;39(2):248-65. doi: 10.1007/s10900-013-9776-8.
5
Cancer statistics, 2013.癌症统计数据,2013 年。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2013 Jan;63(1):11-30. doi: 10.3322/caac.21166. Epub 2013 Jan 17.
6
Multilevel interventions: study design and analysis issues.多层次干预措施:研究设计与分析问题
J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2012 May;2012(44):49-55. doi: 10.1093/jncimonographs/lgs010.
7
A framework for disseminating evidence-based health promotion practices.基于证据的健康促进实践传播框架。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2012;9:E22. Epub 2011 Dec 15.
8
Vital signs: Colorectal cancer screening, incidence, and mortality--United States, 2002-2010.生命体征:2002-2010 年美国结直肠癌筛查、发病和死亡情况。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2011 Jul 8;60(26):884-9.
9
Designing for diffusion: how can we increase uptake of cancer communication innovations?设计扩散:我们如何提高癌症传播创新的采用率?
Patient Educ Couns. 2010 Dec;81 Suppl(Suppl):S100-10. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2010.10.013. Epub 2010 Nov 9.
10
Applying Diffusion of Innovation Theory to Intervention Development.将创新扩散理论应用于干预措施的开发。
Res Soc Work Pract. 2009 Sep 1;19(5):503-518. doi: 10.1177/1049731509335569.