Chinniah Rathika, Vijayan Murali, Thirunavukkarasu Manikandan, Mani Dhivakar, Raju Kamaraj, Ravi Padma Malini, Sivanadham Ramgopal, C Kandeepan, N Mahalakshmi, Karuppiah Balakrishnan
Department of Immunology, School of Biological Sciences, Madurai Kamaraj University, Madurai, 625 021, Tamil Nadu, India.
Department of Biotechnology & Genetic Engineering, School of Biotechnology, Bharathidasan University, Tiruchirappalli, 620 024, Tamil Nadu, India.
PLoS One. 2016 Jun 17;11(6):e0157468. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0157468. eCollection 2016.
Seven human-specific Alu markers were studied in 574 unrelated individuals from 10 endogamous groups and 2 hill tribes of Tamil Nadu and Kerala states. DNA was isolated, amplified by PCR-SSP, and subjected to agarose gel electrophoresis, and genotypes were assigned for various Alu loci. Average heterozygosity among caste populations was in the range of 0.292-0.468. Among tribes, the average heterozygosity was higher for Paliyan (0.3759) than for Kani (0.2915). Frequency differences were prominent in all loci studied except Alu CD4. For Alu CD4, the frequency was 0.0363 in Yadavas, a traditional pastoral and herd maintaining population, and 0.2439 in Narikuravars, a nomadic gypsy population. The overall genetic difference (Gst) of 12 populations (castes and tribes) studied was 3.6%, which corresponds to the Gst values of 3.6% recorded earlier for Western Asian populations. Thus, our study confirms the genetic similarities between West Asian populations and South Indian castes and tribes and supported the large scale coastal migrations from Africa into India through West Asia. However, the average genetic difference (Gst) of Kani and Paliyan tribes with other South Indian tribes studied earlier was 8.3%. The average Gst of combined South and North Indian Tribes (CSNIT) was 9.5%. Neighbor joining tree constructed showed close proximity of Kani and Paliyan tribal groups to the other two South Indian tribes, Toda and Irula of Nilgiri hills studied earlier. Further, the analysis revealed the affinities among populations and confirmed the presence of North and South India specific lineages. Our findings have documented the highly diverse (micro differentiated) nature of South Indian tribes, predominantly due to isolation, than the endogamous population groups of South India. Thus, our study firmly established the genetic relationship of South Indian castes and tribes and supported the proposed large scale ancestral migrations from Africa, particularly into South India through West Asian corridor.
在来自泰米尔纳德邦和喀拉拉邦10个内婚群体和2个山地部落的574名无亲缘关系个体中,研究了7种人类特有的Alu标记。提取DNA,通过PCR-SSP进行扩增,然后进行琼脂糖凝胶电泳,并为各个Alu位点确定基因型。种姓群体中的平均杂合度在0.292 - 0.468范围内。在部落中,帕利扬人(0.3759)的平均杂合度高于卡尼人(0.2915)。除Alu CD4外,在所研究的所有位点上频率差异都很显著。对于Alu CD4,在传统的畜牧和放牧群体雅达瓦人中频率为0.0363,在游牧吉普赛群体纳里库拉瓦尔人中频率为0.2439。所研究的12个人口群体(种姓和部落)的总体遗传差异(Gst)为3.6%,这与之前记录的西亚人口群体3.6%的Gst值相对应。因此,我们的研究证实了西亚人口群体与南印度种姓和部落之间的遗传相似性,并支持了从非洲经西亚大规模沿海迁徙进入印度的观点。然而,卡尼部落和帕利扬部落与之前研究的其他南印度部落的平均遗传差异(Gst)为8.3%。南印度和北印度部落组合(CSNIT)的平均Gst为9.5%。构建的邻接树显示,卡尼部落和帕利扬部落群体与之前研究的尼尔吉里山的另外两个南印度部落托达人和伊鲁拉人关系密切。此外,分析揭示了各群体之间的亲缘关系,并证实了印度北部和南部特有的谱系的存在。我们的研究结果记录了南印度部落高度多样化(微分化)的性质,这主要是由于隔离,而非南印度的内婚群体。因此,我们的研究坚定地确立了南印度种姓和部落的遗传关系,并支持了所提出的从非洲,特别是经西亚走廊大规模向印度南部的祖先迁徙。