Domingo José L
Laboratory of Toxicology and Environmental Health, School of Medicine, IISPV, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Sant Llorenç 21, 43201 Reus, Catalonia, Spain.
Food Chem Toxicol. 2016 Sep;95:12-8. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2016.06.013. Epub 2016 Jun 16.
In a wide revision of the literature conducted in 2000, I noted that the information in scientific journals on the safety of genetically modified (GM) foods in general, and GM plants in particular, was scarce. Of course, it was not sufficient to guarantee that the consumption of these products should not mean risks for the health of the consumers. Because of the scientific interest in GM organisms (GMOs), as well as the great concern that the consumption of GM foods/plants has raised in a number of countries, I conducted two subsequent revisions (2007 and 2011) on the adverse/toxic effects of GM plants. In the present review, I have updated the information on the potential adverse health effects of GM plants consumed as food and/or feed. With only a few exceptions, the reported studies in the last six years show rather similar conclusions; that is to say, the assessed GM soybeans, rice, corn/maize and wheat would be as safe as the parental species of these plants. However, in spite of the notable increase in the available information, studies on the long-term health effects of GM plants, including tests of mutagenicity, teratogenicity and carcinogenicity seem to be still clearly necessary.
在2000年对文献进行的广泛回顾中,我注意到科学期刊上关于一般转基因食品尤其是转基因植物安全性的信息稀缺。当然,这些信息不足以保证食用这些产品对消费者健康不会构成风险。由于对转基因生物具有科学兴趣,同时转基因食品/植物的食用在一些国家引起了极大关注,我随后(2007年和2011年)对转基因植物的不良/毒性作用进行了两次回顾。在本综述中,我更新了有关作为食品和/或饲料食用的转基因植物潜在健康不良影响的信息。除了少数例外情况,过去六年中报道的研究得出了相当相似的结论;也就是说,经评估的转基因大豆、水稻、玉米和小麦与这些植物的亲本物种一样安全。然而,尽管现有信息显著增加,但对转基因植物长期健康影响的研究,包括致突变性、致畸性和致癌性测试,似乎显然仍然是必要的。