Valley Thomas S, Sjoding Michael W, Goldberger Zachary D, Cooke Colin R
Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Michigan Center for Integrative Research in Critical Care, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Michigan Center for Integrative Research in Critical Care, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
Chest. 2016 Sep;150(3):524-32. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2016.05.034. Epub 2016 Jun 15.
Quality of care for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and heart failure (HF) varies across hospitals, but the factors driving variation are incompletely understood. We evaluated the relationship between a hospital's ICU or coronary care unit (CCU) admission rate and quality of care provided to patients with AMI or HF.
A retrospective cohort study of Medicare beneficiaries hospitalized in 2010 with AMI or HF was performed. Hospitals were grouped into quintiles according to their risk- and reliability-adjusted ICU admission rates for AMI or HF. We examined the rates that hospitals failed to deliver standard AMI or HF processes of care (process measure failure rates), 30-day mortality, 30-day readmissions, and Medicare spending after adjusting for patient and hospital characteristics.
Hospitals in the lowest quintile had ICU admission rates < 29% for AMI or < 8% for HF. Hospitals in the top quintile had rates > 61% for AMI or > 24% for HF. Hospitals in the highest quintile had higher process measure failure rates for some but not all process measures. Hospitals in the top quintile had greater 30-day mortality (14.8% vs 14.0% [P = .002] for AMI; 11.4% vs 10.6% [P < .001] for HF), but no differences in 30-day readmissions or Medicare spending were seen compared with hospitals in the lowest quintile.
Hospitals with the highest rates of ICU admission for patients with AMI or HF delivered lower quality of care and had higher 30-day mortality for these conditions. Hospitals with high ICU use may be targets to improve care delivery.
急性心肌梗死(AMI)和心力衰竭(HF)的医疗质量在不同医院间存在差异,但导致这种差异的因素尚未完全明确。我们评估了医院的重症监护病房(ICU)或冠心病监护病房(CCU)收治率与为AMI或HF患者提供的医疗质量之间的关系。
对2010年因AMI或HF住院的医疗保险受益人进行回顾性队列研究。根据AMI或HF的风险和可靠性调整后的ICU收治率,将医院分为五等份。在调整患者和医院特征后,我们检查了医院未能提供标准AMI或HF护理流程的发生率(流程指标失败率)、30天死亡率、30天再入院率和医疗保险支出。
最低五分之一的医院,AMI的ICU收治率<29%,HF的ICU收治率<8%。最高五分之一的医院,AMI的ICU收治率>61%,HF的ICU收治率>24%。最高五分之一的医院,部分但并非所有流程指标的流程指标失败率更高。最高五分之一的医院30天死亡率更高(AMI为14.8%对14.0%[P = .002];HF为11.4%对10.6%[P < .001]),但与最低五分之一的医院相比,30天再入院率或医疗保险支出没有差异。
AMI或HF患者ICU收治率最高的医院提供的医疗质量较低,且这些情况下的30天死亡率更高。ICU使用率高的医院可能是改善医疗服务的目标。