• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Development of a social emotional information processing assessment for adults (SEIP-Q).成人社会情感信息处理评估工具（SEIP-Q）的开发。
Aggress Behav. 2017 Jan;43(1):47-59. doi: 10.1002/ab.21661. Epub 2016 Jun 20.
2
Social emotional information processing in adults: Development and psychometrics of a computerized video assessment in healthy controls and aggressive individuals.成人的社会情感信息处理：健康对照者和攻击性个体的计算机化视频评估的开发与心理测量学
Psychiatry Res. 2017 Feb;248:40-47. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2016.11.004. Epub 2016 Nov 8.
3
Social cognition in Intermittent Explosive Disorder and aggression.间歇性爆发性障碍中的社会认知与攻击行为
J Psychiatr Res. 2016 Dec;83:140-150. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2016.07.010. Epub 2016 Jul 16.
4
Attributional and emotional responses to socially ambiguous cues: validation of a new assessment of social/emotional information processing in healthy adults and impulsive aggressive patients.对社会模糊线索的归因和情绪反应：健康成年人及冲动攻击性患者社会/情绪信息加工新评估方法的验证
J Psychiatr Res. 2009 Jul;43(10):915-25. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2009.01.012. Epub 2009 Apr 3.
5
Neuronal responses in social-emotional information processing in impulsive aggressive individuals.冲动型攻击个体社会情感信息处理中的神经元反应。
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2022 May;47(6):1249-1255. doi: 10.1038/s41386-022-01296-3. Epub 2022 Mar 11.
6
Generalized hostile interpretation bias regarding facial expressions: Characteristic of pathological aggressive behavior.对面部表情的广泛性敌意解释偏差：病理性攻击行为的特征。
Aggress Behav. 2017 Jul;43(4):386-397. doi: 10.1002/ab.21697. Epub 2017 Feb 12.
7
Neuronal responses to adverse social threat in healthy human subjects.健康人类受试者对不良社会威胁的神经元反应。
J Psychiatr Res. 2021 Apr;136:47-53. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2021.01.015. Epub 2021 Jan 19.
8
Emotional intelligence and impulsive aggression in Intermittent Explosive Disorder.间歇性爆发性障碍中的情商与冲动性攻击
J Psychiatr Res. 2015 Feb;61:135-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2014.11.004. Epub 2014 Nov 21.
9
[Social information processing in physically and relationally aggressive preschool children].[身体攻击型和关系攻击型学龄前儿童的社会信息加工]
Z Kinder Jugendpsychiatr Psychother. 2010 May;38(3):211-8. doi: 10.1024/1422-4917/a000034.
10
Emotion attribution in intermittent explosive disorder.间歇性爆发障碍中的情绪归因。
Compr Psychiatry. 2021 Apr;106:152229. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2021.152229. Epub 2021 Feb 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Neural Correlates of Positive Outcome Expectancy for Aggression: Evidence from Voxel-Based Morphometry and Resting-State Functional Connectivity Analysis.攻击行为积极结果预期的神经关联：基于体素的形态测量和静息态功能连接分析的证据。
Brain Sci. 2023 Dec 31;14(1):43. doi: 10.3390/brainsci14010043.
2
Virtual reality aggression prevention treatment in a Dutch prison-based population: a pilot study.荷兰监狱人群中的虚拟现实侵犯预防治疗：一项试点研究。
Front Psychol. 2023 Nov 14;14:1235808. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1235808. eCollection 2023.
3
Generating a Moderated Mediation Model of Positive Outcome Expectancy and Aggression.生成一个关于积极结果预期与攻击性的有调节的中介模型。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2023 Aug 31;13(9):729. doi: 10.3390/bs13090729.
4
Aggressive and psychopathic traits are linked to the acquisition of stable but imprecise hostile expectations.攻击性和精神病态特征与获得稳定但不精确的敌意预期有关。
Transl Psychiatry. 2023 Jun 10;13(1):197. doi: 10.1038/s41398-023-02497-0.
5
Working memory guidance of visual attention to threat in offenders.工作记忆对罪犯视觉注意威胁的引导。
PLoS One. 2022 Jan 7;17(1):e0261882. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0261882. eCollection 2022.
6
Neuronal responses to adverse social threat in healthy human subjects.健康人类受试者对不良社会威胁的神经元反应。
J Psychiatr Res. 2021 Apr;136:47-53. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2021.01.015. Epub 2021 Jan 19.
7
Genome-Wide DNA Methylation Changes Associated with Intermittent Explosive Disorder: A Gene-Based Functional Enrichment Analysis.全基因组 DNA 甲基化变化与间歇性爆发性障碍相关：基于基因的功能富集分析。
Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2018 Jan 1;21(1):12-20. doi: 10.1093/ijnp/pyx087.
8
Social emotional information processing in adults: Development and psychometrics of a computerized video assessment in healthy controls and aggressive individuals.成人的社会情感信息处理：健康对照者和攻击性个体的计算机化视频评估的开发与心理测量学
Psychiatry Res. 2017 Feb;248:40-47. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2016.11.004. Epub 2016 Nov 8.
9
Social cognition in Intermittent Explosive Disorder and aggression.间歇性爆发性障碍中的社会认知与攻击行为
J Psychiatr Res. 2016 Dec;83:140-150. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2016.07.010. Epub 2016 Jul 16.

本文引用的文献

1
Emotion regulation deficits in intermittent explosive disorder.间歇性爆发性障碍中的情绪调节缺陷。
Aggress Behav. 2015 Jan;41(1):25-33. doi: 10.1002/ab.21566.
2
Personality disorder--not otherwise specified evidence of validity and consideration for DSM-5.未特定人格障碍的有效性证据及其在 DSM-5 中的考虑。
Compr Psychiatry. 2012 Oct;53(7):907-14. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2012.03.007. Epub 2012 Apr 18.
3
Real-Time Decision Making and Aggressive Behavior in Youth: A Heuristic Model of Response Evaluation and Decision (RED).青少年的实时决策与攻击性行为：反应评估与决策启发式模型（RED）
Aggress Behav. 2006 Nov 1;32(6):604-624. doi: 10.1002/ab.20150.
4
The Reactive-Proactive Aggression Questionnaire: Differential Correlates of Reactive and Proactive Aggression in Adolescent Boys.反应性-主动性攻击问卷：青少年男性中反应性攻击与主动性攻击的差异相关性
Aggress Behav. 2006 Apr 1;32(2):159-171. doi: 10.1002/ab.20115.
5
Proactive, reactive, and romantic relational aggression in adulthood: measurement, predictive validity, gender differences, and association with Intermittent Explosive Disorder.成人期的主动性、反应性和浪漫关系攻击：测量、预测效度、性别差异，以及与间歇性爆发障碍的关联。
J Psychiatr Res. 2010 Apr;44(6):393-404. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2009.09.005. Epub 2009 Oct 12.
6
Attributional and emotional responses to socially ambiguous cues: validation of a new assessment of social/emotional information processing in healthy adults and impulsive aggressive patients.对社会模糊线索的归因和情绪反应：健康成年人及冲动攻击性患者社会/情绪信息加工新评估方法的验证
J Psychiatr Res. 2009 Jul;43(10):915-25. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2009.01.012. Epub 2009 Apr 3.
7
Development of Response Evaluation and Decision (RED) and antisocial behavior in childhood and adolescence.儿童和青少年时期反应评估与决策（RED）的发展及反社会行为
Dev Psychol. 2009 Mar;45(2):447-59. doi: 10.1037/a0014142.
8
Psychophysiological correlates of aggression and violence: an integrative review.攻击与暴力行为的心理生理关联：一项综合综述
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2008 Aug 12;363(1503):2543-55. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2008.0028.
9
A meta-analysis of the distinction between reactive and proactive aggression in children and adolescents.儿童和青少年中反应性攻击与主动性攻击差异的荟萃分析。
J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2007 Aug;35(4):522-35. doi: 10.1007/s10802-007-9109-4. Epub 2007 Mar 6.
10
PennTwins: a population-based cohort for twin studies.宾夕法尼亚双胞胎研究：一个基于人群的双胞胎研究队列。
Twin Res Hum Genet. 2006 Dec;9(6):998-1005. doi: 10.1375/183242706779462633.

成人社会情感信息处理评估工具（SEIP-Q）的开发。

Development of a social emotional information processing assessment for adults (SEIP-Q).

作者信息

Coccaro Emil F, Fanning Jennifer, Lee Royce

机构信息

Clinical Neuroscience and Psychopharmacology Research Unit, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neuroscience, The Pritzker School of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.

出版信息

Aggress Behav. 2017 Jan;43(1):47-59. doi: 10.1002/ab.21661. Epub 2016 Jun 20.

DOI:10.1002/ab.21661
PMID:27321909
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6323644/
Abstract

An expanded self-report, vignette-based, questionnaire was developed to assess five components in a social emotional information processing model (SEIP: attribution, emotional response, response valuation, outcome expectancy, response efficacy, and response enactment), first in a population-based sample (n = 250) and, second in healthy control participants (n = 50) and in those with DSM-5 Intermittent Explosive Disorder (IED: n = 50). SEIP-Q vignettes depict, separately, both overtly aggressive and relationally aggressive as well as socially ambivalent scenarios. This expanded SEIP-Q assessment demonstrated good internal reliability, as well as convergent and discriminant validity, for all five SEIP components. IED participants differed from healthy controls in all SEIP-Q components. This expanded SEIP-Q assessment is thus proposed as a reliable and valid method for studying the various stages of SEIP in adult human subjects. Aggr. Behav. 43:47-59, 2017. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

摘要

我们开发了一种基于 vignette 的扩展自陈问卷，用于评估社会情绪信息处理模型（SEIP：归因、情绪反应、反应评估、结果预期、反应效能和反应实施）中的五个组成部分，首先在一个基于人群的样本（n = 250）中进行，其次在健康对照参与者（n = 50）和患有 DSM-5 间歇性爆发障碍（IED：n = 50）的人群中进行。SEIP-Q vignette 分别描绘了明显攻击性、关系攻击性以及社会矛盾情景。这种扩展的 SEIP-Q 评估在所有五个 SEIP 组成部分中都显示出良好的内部信度以及聚合效度和区分效度。IED 参与者在所有 SEIP-Q 组成部分上与健康对照者不同。因此，这种扩展的 SEIP-Q 评估被提议作为研究成年人类受试者 SEIP 各个阶段的一种可靠且有效的方法。《攻击性行为》43:47 - 59，2017 年。©2016 威利期刊公司