Department of Psychology, Mississippi State, Starkville, MS, United States of America.
Clinical Neuroscience and Psychotherapeutics Research Unit, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Health, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, United States of America.
Compr Psychiatry. 2021 Apr;106:152229. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2021.152229. Epub 2021 Feb 1.
Accurate recognition of the emotions of others is an important part of healthy neurological development and promotes positive psychosocial adaptation. Differences in emotional recognition may be associated with the presence of emotional biases and can alter one's perception, thus influencing their overall social cognition abilities. The present study aims to extend our collective understanding of emotion attribution abnormalities in individuals with Intermittent Explosive Disorder (IED).
Two-hundred and forty-two adults participated, separated into groups of those diagnosed with IED according to DSM 5 criteria, Psychiatric Controls (PC), and Healthy Controls (HC). Participants completed a modified version of the Emotional Attribution Task wherein they attributed an emotion to the main character of a short vignette.
Participants with IED correctly identified anger stories and misattributed anger to non-anger stories significantly more often than PC and HC participants. They were also significantly less likely than HC participants to correctly identify "sad stories."
We utilized self-report assessments in a community-recruited sample. Replication in a clinical is suggested.
Findings from this study support the validity of IED as a diagnostic entity and provide important information about how individuals with psychiatric disorders perceive and experience emotional cues.
准确识别他人的情绪是健康神经发育的重要组成部分,有助于促进积极的社会心理适应。情绪识别方面的差异可能与情绪偏差的存在有关,并且可以改变一个人的感知,从而影响其整体社会认知能力。本研究旨在进一步了解间歇性爆发障碍(IED)患者在情绪归因方面的异常。
242 名成年人参与了研究,分为符合 DSM-5 标准的 IED 诊断组、精神科对照组(PC)和健康对照组(HC)。参与者完成了情绪归因任务的修改版,他们需要根据一个短片的主角来归因情绪。
IED 组参与者正确识别愤怒故事的比例与 PC 和 HC 组相似,但他们将愤怒归因于非愤怒故事的比例显著高于 PC 和 HC 组。与 HC 组相比,他们正确识别“悲伤故事”的比例也显著较低。
我们在社区招募的样本中使用了自我报告评估。建议在临床环境中进行复制研究。
本研究的结果支持 IED 作为一种诊断实体的有效性,并提供了有关精神障碍患者如何感知和体验情绪线索的重要信息。