Fontaine Reid Griffith, Dodge Kenneth A
Psychology Department, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.
Aggress Behav. 2006 Nov 1;32(6):604-624. doi: 10.1002/ab.20150.
Considerable scientific and intervention attention has been paid to judgment and decision-making systems associated with aggressive behavior in youth. However, most empirical studies have investigated social-cognitive correlates of stable child and adolescent aggressiveness, and less is known about real-time decision making to engage in aggressive behavior. A model of real-time decision making must incorporate both impulsive actions and rational thought. The present paper advances a process model (response evaluation and decision; RED) of real-time behavioral judgments and decision making in aggressive youths with mathematic representations that may be used to quantify response strength. These components are a heuristic to describe decision making, though it is doubtful that individuals always mentally complete these steps. RED represents an organization of social-cognitive operations believed to be active during the response decision step of social information processing. The model posits that RED processes can be circumvented through impulsive responding. This article provides a description and integration of thoughtful, rational decision making and nonrational impulsivity in aggressive behavioral interactions.
相当多的科学研究和干预措施都聚焦于与青少年攻击性行为相关的判断和决策系统。然而,大多数实证研究都调查了儿童和青少年稳定攻击性的社会认知相关因素,而对于参与攻击性行为的实时决策了解较少。实时决策模型必须同时纳入冲动行为和理性思维。本文提出了一个针对攻击性青少年实时行为判断和决策的过程模型(反应评估与决策;RED),该模型具有数学表示形式,可用于量化反应强度。这些组成部分是一种描述决策的启发式方法,不过个体是否总是在心理上完成这些步骤尚不确定。RED代表了一种社会认知操作的组织,被认为在社会信息处理的反应决策步骤中处于活跃状态。该模型假定,冲动反应可以绕过RED过程。本文对攻击性行为互动中的深思熟虑、理性决策和非理性冲动进行了描述和整合。