Leonenko Marina, Drach-Zahavy Anat
Nursing Management, Clalit Health Services, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Department of Nursing, University of Haifa, Israel.
J Adv Nurs. 2016 Nov;72(11):2718-2727. doi: 10.1111/jan.13047. Epub 2016 Jul 5.
The aims of this study were: (1) to understand the implicit and explicit perceptions of accountability from the perspective of bedside nurses and their managers; (2) to identify the factors that facilitate accountability behaviours.
Despite the importance attributed to accountability in nursing education and practice, empirical research lacks clarity regarding how nurses perceive accountability and decide whether or not to act accountably.
Qualitative study.
Data of a purposeful sample of 23 nurses were collected through in-depth semi-structured interviews during 2015. They were tape-recorded, transcribed verbatim and content analysed.
Nurses agreed that accountability, more particularly responsibility, was crucial to nursing professionalism. However, they perceived the demands for transparency and answerability as unjustified. Bedside nurses held this view more than nursing managers. Still, accountability was not considered an integral organizational norm but the choice of each nurse and his or her assessment of risks or benefits of acting accountably.
Nurses' individual accountability was insufficient to generate accountability behaviours. They tended to weigh up the unit's accountability level in gauging risks and benefits before acting accountably. Risks of accountability behaviour included isolation, resistance and bullying, while benefits included professionalism, empowerment and pride.
本研究的目的是:(1)从床边护士及其管理者的角度了解对问责制的隐性和显性认知;(2)确定促进问责行为的因素。
尽管在护理教育和实践中问责制很重要,但实证研究在护士如何看待问责制以及如何决定是否采取问责行动方面缺乏清晰度。
定性研究。
2015年通过深入的半结构化访谈收集了23名护士的目的抽样数据。访谈进行了录音,逐字转录并进行了内容分析。
护士们一致认为问责制,尤其是责任,对护理专业精神至关重要。然而,他们认为对透明度和可问责性的要求是不合理的。床边护士比护理管理者更持这种观点。尽管如此,问责制并未被视为一项不可或缺的组织规范,而是每个护士的个人选择以及他或她对采取问责行动的风险或益处的评估。
护士的个人问责不足以产生问责行为。他们在采取问责行动之前,往往会权衡单位的问责水平以评估风险和益处。问责行为的风险包括孤立、抵制和欺凌,而益处包括专业精神、赋权和自豪感。