Ackerman Robert A, Hands Aaron J, Donnellan M Brent, Hopwood Christopher J, Witt Edward A
University of Texas at Dallas.
University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.
J Pers Disord. 2017 Jun;31(3):346-361. doi: 10.1521/pedi_2016_30_254. Epub 2016 Jun 20.
There is debate over the definition of narcissism across social/personality and clinical psychology. The current article aims to quantify the level of disagreement by measuring experts' opinions concerning the attributes most central to narcissism. Accordingly, we developed a comprehensive list of attributes associated with narcissism and had 49 self-identified experts (among them 17 women, 23 psychologists from clinical psychology and 22 from social/personality psychology) rate these characteristics and provide their opinions on several issues related to the conceptualization of narcissism. Experts generally believe that the grandiose features of narcissism are more central than the vulnerable features. However, differences between clinical and social/personality psychologists were evident, especially regarding the relevance of self-esteem. Given the results, we suggest that researchers specify the kind of narcissism being assessed in a given study and consider using assessments of the full range of narcissistic features in future research to provide a more comprehensive perspective on the construct.
社会/人格心理学和临床心理学对自恋的定义存在争议。本文旨在通过衡量专家对自恋最核心属性的看法来量化分歧程度。相应地,我们编制了一份与自恋相关的属性综合清单,并让49位自称的专家(其中17名女性,23名临床心理学心理学家和22名社会/人格心理学心理学家)对这些特征进行评分,并就与自恋概念化相关的几个问题发表意见。专家们普遍认为,自恋的夸大特征比脆弱特征更核心。然而,临床心理学家和社会/人格心理学家之间的差异很明显,尤其是在自尊的相关性方面。鉴于研究结果,我们建议研究人员在特定研究中明确所评估的自恋类型,并考虑在未来研究中使用对自恋特征全范围的评估,以便对该构念提供更全面的视角。