Suppr超能文献

除创伤团队启动标准外,使用反向休克指数识别高风险创伤患者:基于创伤登记系统的横断面研究。

The use of the reverse shock index to identify high-risk trauma patients in addition to the criteria for trauma team activation: a cross-sectional study based on a trauma registry system.

作者信息

Kuo Spencer C H, Kuo Pao-Jen, Hsu Shiun-Yuan, Rau Cheng-Shyuan, Chen Yi-Chun, Hsieh Hsiao-Yun, Hsieh Ching-Hua

机构信息

Department of Trauma Surgery, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan Department of Surgery, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.

Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2016 Jun 21;6(6):e011072. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011072.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The presentation of decrease blood pressure with tachycardia is usually an indicator of significant blood loss. In this study, we used the reverse shock index (RSI), a ratio of systolic blood pressure (SBP) to heart rate (HR), to evaluate the haemodynamic status of trauma patients. As an SBP lower than the HR (RSI<1) may indicate haemodynamic instability, the objective of this study was to assess whether RSI<1 can help to identify high-risk patients with potential shock and poor outcome, even though these patients do not yet meet the criteria for multidisciplinary trauma team activation (TTA).

DESIGN

Cross-sectional study.

SETTING

Taiwan.

PARTICIPANTS

We retrospectively reviewed the data of 20 106 patients obtained from the trauma registry system of a level I trauma centre for trauma admissions from January 2009 through December 2014. Patients for whom a trauma team was not activated (regular patients) and who had RSI<1 were compared with regular patients with RSI≥1. The ORs of the associated conditions and injuries were calculated with 95% CIs.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

In-hospital mortality.

RESULTS

Among regular patients with RSI<1, significantly more patients had an Injury Severity Score (ISS) ≥25 (OR 2.4, 95% CI 1.58 to 3.62; p<0.001) and the mortality rate was also higher (2.1% vs 0.5%; OR 3.9, 95% CI 2.10 to 7.08; p<0.001) than in regular patients with RSI≥1. The intensive care unit length of stay was longer in regular patients with RSI<1 than in regular patients with RSI≥1.

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients who did not reach the criteria for TTA, RSI<1 indicates a potentially worse outcome and a requirement for more attention and aggressive care in the emergency department.

摘要

目的

血压下降伴心动过速通常提示大量失血。在本研究中,我们使用反向休克指数(RSI),即收缩压(SBP)与心率(HR)的比值,来评估创伤患者的血流动力学状态。由于SBP低于HR(RSI<1)可能提示血流动力学不稳定,本研究的目的是评估RSI<1是否有助于识别有潜在休克和不良预后的高危患者,即使这些患者尚未达到多学科创伤团队启动(TTA)的标准。

设计

横断面研究。

地点

台湾。

参与者

我们回顾性分析了20106例患者的数据,这些数据来自于一家一级创伤中心2009年1月至2014年12月期间创伤入院的创伤登记系统。未启动创伤团队的患者(普通患者)中,RSI<1的患者与RSI≥1的普通患者进行比较。计算相关疾病和损伤的比值比(OR)及95%可信区间(CI)。

主要观察指标

住院死亡率。

结果

在RSI<1的普通患者中,损伤严重度评分(ISS)≥25的患者显著更多(OR 2.4,95%CI 1.58至3.62;p<0.001),死亡率也更高(2.1%对0.5%;OR 3.9,95%CI 2.10至7.08;p<0.001),高于RSI≥1的普通患者。RSI<1的普通患者在重症监护病房的住院时间比RSI≥1的普通患者更长。

结论

在未达到TTA标准的患者中,RSI<1提示预后可能更差,在急诊科需要更多关注和积极治疗。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

3
Pediatric specific shock index accurately identifies severely injured children.儿科专用休克指数能准确识别重伤儿童。
J Pediatr Surg. 2015 Feb;50(2):331-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2014.08.009. Epub 2014 Oct 1.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验