Wang Dongwen, Luque Amneris E
University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA.
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2016;225:267-71.
The New York State HIV-HCV-STD Clinical Education Initiative (CEI) has developed a large repository of online resources and disseminated them to a wide range of healthcare providers. To evaluate the CEI online education program and in particular to compare the self-reported measures by clinicians from different disciplines, we analyzed the data from 1,558 course completions in a study period of three months. The results have shown that the overall evaluations by the clinicians were very positive. Meanwhile, there were significant differences across the clinical disciplines. In particular, physicians and nurse practitioners were the most satisfied. In contrast, pharmacists and case/care managers recorded lower than average responses. Nurses and counselors had mixed results. Nurse practitioners' responses were very similar to physicians on most measures, but significantly different from nurses in many aspects. For more effective knowledge dissemination, online education programs should consider the unique needs by clinicians from specific disciplines.
纽约州艾滋病毒-丙型肝炎-性传播疾病临床教育倡议(CEI)开发了一个庞大的在线资源库,并将其分发给了广泛的医疗保健提供者。为了评估CEI在线教育项目,特别是比较不同学科临床医生的自我报告措施,我们分析了三个月研究期内1558次课程结业的数据。结果表明,临床医生的总体评价非常积极。同时,不同临床学科之间存在显著差异。特别是,医生和执业护士最为满意。相比之下,药剂师以及病例/护理经理的反馈低于平均水平。护士和顾问的结果喜忧参半。执业护士在大多数指标上的反馈与医生非常相似,但在许多方面与护士有显著差异。为了更有效地传播知识,在线教育项目应考虑特定学科临床医生的独特需求。