Hiebler-Ragger Michaela, Falthansl-Scheinecker Johanna, Birnhuber Gerhard, Fink Andreas, Unterrainer Human Friedrich
University Clinic of Psychiatry, Medical University Graz, Graz, Austria.
Center for Integrative Addiction Research (Grüner Kreis Society), Vienna, Austria.
PLoS One. 2016 Jun 23;11(6):e0158069. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0158069. eCollection 2016.
Traditionally, in attachment theory, secure attachment has been linked to parameters of mental health, while insecure attachment has been associated with parameters of psychopathology. Furthermore, spirituality and attachment to God have been discussed as corresponding to, or compensating for, primary attachment experiences. Accordingly, they may contribute to mental health or to mental illness. In this cross-sectional observational study, we investigate attachment styles (Avoidant and Anxious Attachment; ECR-RD), spirituality (Religious and Existential Well-Being; MI-RSWB), and mood pathology (Anxiety, Depression, Somatization; BSI-18) in 481 (76% female) young adults (age range: 18-30 years) who had a Roman Catholic upbringing. In accordance with previous research, we found insecure attachment to be associated with low levels of spirituality. Furthermore, insecure attachment and low levels of spirituality were associated with higher levels of mood pathology. In hierarchical regression analyses, only Anxious Attachment positively predicted all three dimensions of mood pathology while Existential Well-Being-but not Religious Well-Being-was an additional negative predictor for Depression. Our results underline that spirituality can correspond to the attachment style, or may also compensate for insecure attachment. Higher Existential Well-Being-comprised of facets such as hope for a better future, forgiveness and the experience of sense and meaning-seems to have an especially corrective effect on mood pathology, independent of attachment styles. Our findings emphasize the vital role of existential well-being in young adults' affective functioning, which might be considered in prevention and treatment. Further research in clinical surroundings is recommended.
传统上,在依恋理论中,安全依恋与心理健康参数相关联,而不安全依恋则与精神病理学参数相关。此外,灵性和对上帝的依恋被讨论为与主要依恋经历相对应或对其进行补偿。因此,它们可能有助于心理健康或导致精神疾病。在这项横断面观察研究中,我们调查了481名(76%为女性)有罗马天主教成长背景的年轻人(年龄范围:18至30岁)的依恋风格(回避型和焦虑型依恋;ECR-RD)、灵性(宗教和存在幸福感;MI-RSWB)以及情绪病理学(焦虑、抑郁、躯体化;BSI-18)。与先前的研究一致,我们发现不安全依恋与低水平的灵性相关。此外,不安全依恋和低水平的灵性与更高水平的情绪病理学相关。在分层回归分析中,只有焦虑型依恋对情绪病理学的所有三个维度都有正向预测作用,而存在幸福感(而非宗教幸福感)是抑郁的另一个负向预测因素。我们的结果强调,灵性可以与依恋风格相对应,也可能补偿不安全依恋。更高的存在幸福感(包括对更美好未来的希望、宽恕以及意义感和使命感等方面)似乎对情绪病理学有特别的纠正作用,且独立于依恋风格。我们的研究结果强调了存在幸福感在年轻人情感功能中的重要作用,这在预防和治疗中可能需要考虑。建议在临床环境中进行进一步研究。