Tucker-Drob Elliot M, Briley Daniel A, Engelhardt Laura E, Mann Frank D, Harden K Paige
Department of Psychology and Population Research Center, University of Texas at Austin.
Department of Psychology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2016 Nov;111(5):790-815. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000098. Epub 2016 Jun 23.
Researchers and the general public have become increasingly intrigued by the roles that systematic tendencies toward thinking, feeling, and behaving might play in academic achievement. Some measures of constructs belonging to this group have been well studied in genetics and psychometrics, while much less is known about measures of other such constructs. The current study focuses on 7 character traits prominently featured in influential intervention-oriented and/or socialization theories of academic achievement: grit, intellectual curiosity, intellectual self-concept, mastery orientation, educational value, intelligence mindset, and test motivation. In a population-based sample of 811 school-aged twins and triplets from the Texas Twin Project, we tested (a) how each measure relates to indices of the Big Five personality traits, (b) how the measures relate to one another, (c) the extent to which each measure is associated with genetic and environmental influences and whether such influences operate through common dimensions of individual differences, and (d) the extent to which genetic and environmental factors mediate the relations between fluid intelligence, character measures, verbal knowledge, and academic achievement. We find moderate relations among the measures that can be captured by a highly heritable common dimension representing a mixture of Openness and Conscientiousness. Moreover, genetically influenced variance in the character measures is associated with multiple measures of verbal knowledge and academic achievement, even after controlling for fluid intelligence. In contrast, environmentally influenced variance in character is largely unrelated to knowledge and achievement outcomes. We propose that character measures popularly used in education may be best conceptualized as indexing facets of personality that are of particular relevance to academic achievement. (PsycINFO Database Record
研究者和普通大众越来越对思维、情感和行为的系统性倾向在学业成就中可能扮演的角色感兴趣。属于这一范畴的某些构念测量方法在遗传学和心理测量学中已得到充分研究,而对于其他此类构念的测量方法则知之甚少。当前的研究聚焦于学业成就的有影响力的干预导向型和/或社会化理论中显著特征的7种性格特质:毅力、求知欲、智力自我概念、掌握导向、教育价值观、智力心态和考试动机。在来自德克萨斯双胞胎项目的811名学龄双胞胎和三胞胎的基于人群的样本中,我们测试了:(a)每种测量方法如何与大五人格特质指标相关;(b)这些测量方法如何相互关联;(c)每种测量方法在多大程度上与遗传和环境影响相关,以及这些影响是否通过个体差异的共同维度起作用;(d)遗传和环境因素在多大程度上介导了流体智力、性格测量、言语知识和学业成就之间的关系。我们发现这些测量方法之间存在适度的关联,这种关联可以由一个高度可遗传的共同维度来体现,该维度代表开放性和尽责性的混合。此外,即使在控制了流体智力之后,性格测量中受遗传影响的方差仍与言语知识和学业成就的多种测量方法相关。相比之下,性格中受环境影响的方差在很大程度上与知识和成就结果无关。我们建议,教育中普遍使用的性格测量方法可能最好被概念化为对与学业成就特别相关的人格方面进行索引。(PsycINFO数据库记录)