Pegado Felipe, Vankrunkelsven Hendrik, Steyaert Jean, Boets Bart, Op de Beeck Hans
Department of Brain and Cognition, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.
Department of Neuroscience, Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.
PLoS One. 2016 Jun 24;11(6):e0158312. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0158312. eCollection 2016.
Is it possible to passively induce visual learning/unlearning in humans for complex stimuli such as faces? We addressed this question in a series of behavioral studies using passive visual stimulation (flickering of faces at specific temporal frequencies) inspired by well-known synaptic mechanisms of learning: long-term potentiation (LTP) vs long-term depression (LTD). We administered a face identity change detection task before and after a passive stimulation protocol to test for potential changes in visual performance. First, with bilateral stimulation, subjects undergoing high-frequency LTP-like stimulation outperformed those submitted to low-frequency LTD-like stimulation despite equivalent baseline performance (exp. 1). Second, unilateral stimulation replicated the differential modulation of performance, but in a hemifield-specific way (exp. 2). Third, for both stimulation groups, a sudden temporary drop in performance on the stimulated side immediately after the stimulation, followed by progressive recovering, can suggest either 'visual fatigue' or 'face adaptation' effects due to the stimulation. Fourth, we tested the life-time of these modulatory effects, revealing they vanish after one hour delay (exp. 3). Fifth, a control study (exp. 4) using low-level visual stimuli also failed to show longer-term effects of sensory stimulation, despite reports of strong effects in the literature. Future studies should determine the necessary and sufficient conditions enabling robust long-term modulation of visual performance using this technique. This step is required to consider further use in fundamental research (e.g., to study neural circuits involved in selective visual processing) and potential educational or clinical applications (e.g., inhibiting socially-irrelevant aspects of face processing in autism).
是否有可能在人类中通过被动方式诱导对诸如面孔等复杂刺激的视觉学习/消除学习?我们在一系列行为研究中探讨了这个问题,这些研究使用了受著名的学习突触机制:长时程增强(LTP)与长时程抑制(LTD)启发的被动视觉刺激(以特定时间频率对面孔进行闪烁)。我们在被动刺激方案前后进行了面孔身份变化检测任务,以测试视觉表现的潜在变化。首先,通过双侧刺激,接受高频LTP样刺激的受试者尽管基线表现相当,但在表现上优于接受低频LTD样刺激的受试者(实验1)。其次,单侧刺激复制了表现的差异调制,但以半视野特异性方式(实验2)。第三,对于两个刺激组,刺激后立即在受刺激侧出现表现的突然暂时下降,随后逐渐恢复,这可能表明由于刺激导致的“视觉疲劳”或“面孔适应”效应。第四,我们测试了这些调制效应的持续时间,发现它们在延迟一小时后消失(实验3)。第五项对照研究(实验4)使用低水平视觉刺激,尽管文献中有关于强烈效应的报道,但也未能显示感觉刺激的长期效应。未来的研究应该确定使用这种技术实现对视觉表现进行强大的长期调制的必要和充分条件。这一步骤是考虑在基础研究(例如,研究参与选择性视觉处理的神经回路)以及潜在的教育或临床应用(例如,抑制自闭症患者面部处理中与社交无关的方面)中进一步应用所必需的。