• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于社区的参与性研究:当社区与研究实践相遇时化解冲突

Community-Based Participatory Research: Ameliorating Conflict When Community and Research Practices Meet.

作者信息

Mayan Maria, Lo Sanchia, Richter Solina, Dastjerdi Mahdieh, Drummond Jane

出版信息

Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2016 Summer;10(2):259-64. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2016.0023.

DOI:10.1353/cpr.2016.0023
PMID:27346772
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Community-based participatory research (CBPR) is "a collaborative process that equitably involves all partners in the research process and recognizes the unique strengths that each brings." Yet working collaboratively throughout the research process is easier said than done.

OBJECTIVES

To illustrate what happens when community partners' and research partners' "unique strengths" or ways of working collide, and the lessons learned from the process partners used to work through their differences.

METHODS

An exploratory qualitative method was used to answer the research question, "How do community and research partners resolve conflict embedded in conventional community and research practices?"

LESSONS LEARNED AND CONCLUSIONS

When new partners join an established CBPR partnership, it is important to begin by getting to know the new partner rather than with the tasks that need to be accomplished. Furthermore, when conflict is pervasive, partners should move away from discussions and work together on a concrete task together.

摘要

背景

基于社区的参与性研究(CBPR)是“一个协作过程,公平地让所有合作伙伴参与研究过程,并认可各方所具备的独特优势”。然而,在整个研究过程中进行协作说起来容易做起来难。

目的

阐述当社区合作伙伴和研究合作伙伴的“独特优势”或工作方式发生冲突时会出现什么情况,以及合作伙伴从解决分歧的过程中学到了哪些经验教训。

方法

采用探索性定性方法来回答研究问题,即“社区和研究合作伙伴如何解决传统社区与研究实践中固有的冲突?”

经验教训与结论

当新的合作伙伴加入已有的CBPR合作关系时,首先了解新伙伴而非直接着手需要完成的任务非常重要。此外,当冲突普遍存在时,合作伙伴应停止讨论,共同致力于一项具体任务。

相似文献

1
Community-Based Participatory Research: Ameliorating Conflict When Community and Research Practices Meet.基于社区的参与性研究:当社区与研究实践相遇时化解冲突
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2016 Summer;10(2):259-64. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2016.0023.
2
Perceptions of Empowerment Within and Across Partnerships in Community-Based Participatory Research: A Dyadic Interview Analysis.社区参与式研究中伙伴关系内部及跨伙伴关系的赋权认知:二元访谈分析
Qual Health Res. 2016 Jan;26(1):105-16. doi: 10.1177/1049732315577606. Epub 2015 Apr 7.
3
Measuring Community-Based Participatory Research Partnerships: The Initial Development of an Assessment Instrument.衡量基于社区的参与性研究伙伴关系:一种评估工具的初步开发。
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2015 Winter;9(4):549-60. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2015.0077.
4
The Development of a Collaborative Self-Evaluation Process for Community-Based Participatory Research Partnerships Using the Community-Based Participatory Research Conceptual Model and Other Adaptable Tools.利用基于社区的参与性研究概念模型和其他适用工具,为基于社区的参与性研究伙伴关系开发协作式自我评估过程。
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2019;13(3):225-235. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2019.0050.
5
Community Partner Perspectives on Benefits, Challenges, Facilitating Factors, and Lessons Learned from Community-Based Participatory Research Partnerships in Detroit.社区合作伙伴对底特律基于社区的参与性研究伙伴关系的益处、挑战、促进因素及经验教训的看法
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2015 Summer;9(2):299-311. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2015.0031.
6
Team-building activities as strategies for improving community-university partnerships: lessons learned from Nuestro Futuro Saludable.团队建设活动作为改善社区与大学伙伴关系的策略:从“我们健康的未来”项目中汲取的经验教训
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2012 Summer;6(2):213-8. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2012.0030.
7
Partnering with community-based organizations: an academic institution's evolving perspective.与社区组织合作:学术机构不断演变的视角。
Ethn Dis. 2007 Winter;17(1 Suppl 1):S27-32.
8
Voices of Community Partners: Perspectives Gained from Conversations of Community-Based Participatory Research Experiences.社区合作伙伴的声音:从基于社区的参与式研究经验的对话中获得的观点。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jul 21;17(14):5245. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17145245.
9
Worth the Risk? Muddled Relationships in Community-Based Participatory Research.值得冒险吗?社区参与式研究中的复杂关系。
Qual Health Res. 2016 Jan;26(1):69-76. doi: 10.1177/1049732315618660. Epub 2015 Nov 26.
10
Qualitative Research and Community-Based Participatory Research: Considerations for Effective Dissemination in the Peer-Reviewed Literature.定性研究与基于社区的参与性研究:医学专业学术文献中有效传播的考量因素
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2015 Summer;9(2):275-82. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2015.0041.

引用本文的文献

1
Application of implementation science frameworks to inform the adaptation process of an evidence-based eating disorder prevention program for high-risk perinatal individuals.应用实施科学框架为高风险围产期个体的循证饮食失调预防计划的调整过程提供信息。
Implement Res Pract. 2025 Feb 28;6:26334895251319811. doi: 10.1177/26334895251319811. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
2
Service-integration approaches for families with low income: a Families First Edmonton, community-based, randomized, controlled trial.针对低收入家庭的服务整合方法:埃德蒙顿家庭第一计划,一项基于社区的随机对照试验。
Trials. 2016 Jul 22;17:343. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1444-8.