Karanetz Irena, Stanley Sharon, Knobel Denis, Smith Benjamin D, Bastidas Nicholas, Beg Mansoor, Kasabian Armen K, Tanna Neil
New York, N.Y.
From the Divisions of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery and Surgical Oncology, Northwell Health, Hofstra Northwell School of Medicine.
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016 Jul;138(1):256-261. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000002241.
The timing of reconstruction following melanoma extirpation remains controversial, with some advocating definitive reconstruction only when the results of permanent pathologic evaluation are available. The authors evaluated oncologic safety and cost benefit of single-stage neoplasm extirpation with immediate reconstruction.
The authors reviewed all patients treated with biopsy-proven melanoma followed by immediate reconstruction during a 3-year period (January of 2011 to December of 2013). Patient demographic data, preoperative biopsies, operative details, and postoperative pathology reports were evaluated. Cost analysis was performed using hospital charges for single-stage surgery versus theoretical two-stage surgery.
During the study period, 534 consecutive patients were treated with wide excision and immediate reconstruction, including primary closure in 285 patients (55 percent), local tissue rearrangement in 155 patients (30 percent), and skin grafting in 78 patients (15 percent). The mean patient age was 67 years (range, 19 to 98 years), and the median follow-up time was 1.2 years. Shave biopsy was the most common diagnostic modality, resulting in tumor depth underestimation in 30 patients (6.0 percent). Nine patients (2.7 percent) had positive margins on permanent pathologic evaluation. The only variables associated with positive margins were desmoplastic melanoma (p = 0.004) and tumor location on the cheek (p = 0.0001). The mean hospital charge for immediate reconstruction was $22,528 compared with the theoretical mean charge of $35,641 for delayed reconstruction, leading to mean savings of 38.5 percent (SD, 7.9 percent).
This large series demonstrates that immediate reconstruction can be safely performed in melanoma patients with an acceptable rate of residual tumor requiring reoperation and significant health care cost savings.
CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, IV.
黑色素瘤切除术后重建的时机仍存在争议,一些人主张仅在获得永久病理评估结果后才进行确定性重建。作者评估了一期肿瘤切除并立即重建的肿瘤学安全性和成本效益。
作者回顾了在3年期间(2011年1月至2013年12月)接受活检证实为黑色素瘤并随后立即重建的所有患者。评估患者人口统计学数据、术前活检、手术细节和术后病理报告。使用一期手术与理论上的二期手术的医院收费进行成本分析。
在研究期间,534例连续患者接受了广泛切除并立即重建,其中285例患者(55%)进行了一期缝合,155例患者(30%)进行了局部组织重排,78例患者(15%)进行了植皮。患者平均年龄为67岁(范围19至98岁),中位随访时间为1.2年。削切活检是最常见的诊断方式,导致30例患者(6.0%)肿瘤深度低估。9例患者(2.7%)在永久病理评估时切缘阳性。与切缘阳性相关的唯一变量是促纤维增生性黑色素瘤(p = 0.004)和脸颊部肿瘤位置(p = 0.0001)。立即重建的平均医院收费为22,528美元,而延迟重建的理论平均收费为35,641美元,平均节省38.5%(标准差7.9%)。
这个大型系列研究表明,黑色素瘤患者可以安全地进行立即重建,残留肿瘤需要再次手术的发生率可接受,且能显著节省医疗保健成本。
临床问题/证据级别:治疗性,IV级。