• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Cognitive flexibility correlates with gambling severity in young adults.认知灵活性与年轻人的赌博严重程度相关。
J Psychiatr Res. 2016 Oct;81:9-15. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2016.06.010. Epub 2016 Jun 16.
2
Latent class analysis of gambling subtypes and impulsive/compulsive associations: Time to rethink diagnostic boundaries for gambling disorder?赌博亚型的潜在类别分析及其与冲动/强迫的关联:是时候重新思考赌博障碍的诊断界限了吗?
Addict Behav. 2017 Sep;72:79-85. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2017.03.020. Epub 2017 Mar 28.
3
A neurocognitive comparison of cognitive flexibility and response inhibition in gamblers with varying degrees of clinical severity.对不同临床严重程度的赌徒的认知灵活性和反应抑制的神经认知比较。
Psychol Med. 2011 Oct;41(10):2111-9. doi: 10.1017/S0033291711000316. Epub 2011 Mar 22.
4
Similarities and differences among Internet gaming disorder, gambling disorder and alcohol use disorder: a focus on impulsivity and compulsivity.网络游戏障碍、赌博障碍和酒精使用障碍之间的异同:聚焦冲动性和强迫性。
J Behav Addict. 2014 Dec;3(4):246-53. doi: 10.1556/JBA.3.2014.4.6.
5
Compulsivity-related neurocognitive performance deficits in gambling disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis.赌博障碍中与强迫性相关的神经认知表现缺陷:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2018 Jan;84:204-217. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.11.022. Epub 2017 Dec 5.
6
Cigarette smoking status in pathological gamblers: association with impulsivity and cognitive flexibility.病理性赌博者的吸烟状况:与冲动性和认知灵活性的关系。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2011 Aug 1;117(1):74-7. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2010.12.017. Epub 2011 Feb 5.
7
Trait impulsivity and cognitive domains involving impulsivity and compulsivity as predictors of gambling disorder treatment response.特质冲动性和涉及冲动性和强迫性的认知领域是预测赌博障碍治疗反应的因素。
Addict Behav. 2018 Dec;87:169-176. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2018.07.006. Epub 2018 Jul 11.
8
Neurocognitive dysfunction in problem gamblers with co-occurring antisocial personality disorder.共病反社会型人格障碍的问题赌徒的神经认知功能障碍
Compr Psychiatry. 2017 Jul;76:153-159. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2017.05.004. Epub 2017 May 12.
9
Neurocognitive and clinical correlates of gambling behavior based on mode of gambling.基于赌博方式的赌博行为的神经认知与临床关联
Ann Clin Psychiatry. 2016 Nov;28(4):232-238.
10
A preliminary comparison of cannabis use in subsyndromal gamblers: select neurocognitive and behavioral differences based on use.亚综合征赌徒中大麻使用情况的初步比较:基于使用情况的特定神经认知和行为差异
J Addict Med. 2014 Nov-Dec;8(6):443-9. doi: 10.1097/ADM.0000000000000079.

引用本文的文献

1
Cognitive inflexibility, obsessive-compulsive symptoms and traits and poor post-pandemic adjustment.认知灵活性不足、强迫症状与特质以及疫情后适应不良。
Neurosci Appl. 2024 May 23;3:104073. doi: 10.1016/j.nsa.2024.104073. eCollection 2024.
2
Executive Function in Gambling Disorder: A Meta-analysis on Neuropsychological Evidence.赌博障碍中的执行功能:神经心理学证据的荟萃分析
J Gambl Stud. 2025 Apr 10. doi: 10.1007/s10899-025-10383-1.
3
Transdiagnostic study of dynamic brain activity and connectivity among people with gambling and internet gaming disorders: DYNAMIC BRAIN ACTIVITY IN GD AND IGD.赌博障碍和网络游戏障碍患者动态脑活动及连通性的跨诊断研究:赌博障碍和网络游戏障碍中的动态脑活动
Int J Clin Health Psychol. 2025 Jan-Mar;25(1):100547. doi: 10.1016/j.ijchp.2025.100547. Epub 2025 Jan 29.
4
Ventrolateral prefrontal cortex in macaques guides decisions in different learning contexts.猕猴的腹外侧前额叶皮层在不同学习情境中引导决策。
bioRxiv. 2024 Sep 19:2024.09.18.613767. doi: 10.1101/2024.09.18.613767.
5
Influence of reinforcement learning on the inhibitory control of Internet gaming disorder.强化学习对网络成瘾障碍抑制控制的影响。
Psych J. 2024 Dec;13(6):966-978. doi: 10.1002/pchj.772. Epub 2024 Jul 5.
6
Computational modelling of reinforcement learning and functional neuroimaging of probabilistic reversal for dissociating compulsive behaviours in gambling and cocaine use disorders.强化学习的计算建模与概率反转的功能神经成像,用于区分赌博和可卡因使用障碍中的强迫行为。
BJPsych Open. 2023 Dec 11;10(1):e8. doi: 10.1192/bjo.2023.611.
7
Distress-driven impulsivity interacts with cognitive inflexibility to determine addiction-like eating.由压力驱动的冲动性与认知灵活性相互作用,从而决定成瘾性饮食。
J Behav Addict. 2021 Apr 27;10(3):534-9. doi: 10.1556/2006.2021.00027.
8
Firearm ownership among young adults: Associations with impulsivity and impulse control disorders.年轻人的枪支拥有情况:与冲动和冲动控制障碍的关联。
Ann Clin Psychiatry. 2020 Aug;32(3):176-181.
9
Family history of substance use disorders: Significance for mental health in young adults who gamble.物质使用障碍家族史:对赌博的年轻成年人心理健康的意义。
J Behav Addict. 2020 Jun 5;9(2):289-297. doi: 10.1556/2006.2020.00017. Print 2020 Jun.
10
Correlation of Cognitive Resilience, Cognitive Flexibility and Impulsivity in Attempted Suicide.自杀未遂中认知恢复力、认知灵活性与冲动性的相关性
Indian J Psychol Med. 2019 Jul-Aug;41(4):362-367. doi: 10.4103/IJPSYM.IJPSYM_189_18.

本文引用的文献

1
Impulsivity and gambling: A complex clinical association across three measures.冲动性与赌博:基于三项测量指标的复杂临床关联
Am J Addict. 2016 Mar;25(2):138-44. doi: 10.1111/ajad.12341. Epub 2016 Feb 5.
2
The neuropsychology of obsessive-compulsive personality disorder: a new analysis.强迫症人格障碍的神经心理学:新分析。
CNS Spectr. 2015 Oct;20(5):490-9. doi: 10.1017/S1092852914000662. Epub 2015 Mar 17.
3
Associations between obsessive-compulsive classes and pathological gambling in a national cohort of male twins.在一个全国男性双胞胎队列中,强迫观念与强迫行为类别与病理性赌博之间的关联。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2015 Apr;72(4):342-9. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2014.2497.
4
Similarities and differences among Internet gaming disorder, gambling disorder and alcohol use disorder: a focus on impulsivity and compulsivity.网络游戏障碍、赌博障碍和酒精使用障碍之间的异同:聚焦冲动性和强迫性。
J Behav Addict. 2014 Dec;3(4):246-53. doi: 10.1556/JBA.3.2014.4.6.
5
Set-shifting ability across the spectrum of eating disorders and in overweight and obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis.饮食失调、超重和肥胖患者的转换能力:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Psychol Med. 2014 Dec;44(16):3365-85. doi: 10.1017/S0033291714000294. Epub 2014 Feb 26.
6
Treatment of Gambling Disorders.赌博障碍的治疗
Curr Treat Options Psychiatry. 2014 Jun 1;1(2):189-203. doi: 10.1007/s40501-014-0014-5.
7
Compulsivity and Impulsivity in Pathological Gambling: Does a Dimensional-Transdiagnostic Approach Add Clinical Utility to DSM-5 Classification?病理性赌博中的强迫性与冲动性:维度跨诊断方法对《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第5版分类是否具有临床实用价值?
J Gambl Stud. 2015 Sep;31(3):825-47. doi: 10.1007/s10899-014-9470-5.
8
Contingency learning in alcohol dependence and pathological gambling: learning and unlearning reward contingencies.酒精依赖和病态赌博中的偶然性学习:学习与忘却奖励偶然性
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2014 Jun;38(6):1602-10. doi: 10.1111/acer.12393. Epub 2014 May 12.
9
New developments in human neurocognition: clinical, genetic, and brain imaging correlates of impulsivity and compulsivity.人类神经认知的新发展:冲动性和强迫性的临床、遗传和大脑影像相关性。
CNS Spectr. 2014 Feb;19(1):69-89. doi: 10.1017/S1092852913000801.
10
The opiate antagonist, naltrexone, in the treatment of trichotillomania: results of a double-blind, placebo-controlled study.阿片类拮抗剂纳曲酮治疗拔毛癖:一项双盲、安慰剂对照研究的结果。
J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2014 Feb;34(1):134-8. doi: 10.1097/JCP.0000000000000037.

认知灵活性与年轻人的赌博严重程度相关。

Cognitive flexibility correlates with gambling severity in young adults.

作者信息

Leppink Eric W, Redden Sarah A, Chamberlain Samuel R, Grant Jon E

机构信息

University of Chicago, Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Neuroscience, 5841 S. Maryland Ave., MC3077, Chicago, IL 60637, USA.

Department of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Herchel Smith Building, Robinson Way, Cambridge, CB2 0SZ, UK; Cambridge and Peterborough NHS Foundation Trust (CPFT), Cambridge Road, Fulbourne, Cambridge, CB21 5HH, UK.

出版信息

J Psychiatr Res. 2016 Oct;81:9-15. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2016.06.010. Epub 2016 Jun 16.

DOI:10.1016/j.jpsychires.2016.06.010
PMID:27355427
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5330432/
Abstract

Although gambling disorder (GD) is often characterized as a problem of impulsivity, compulsivity has recently been proposed as a potentially important feature of addictive disorders. The present analysis assessed the neurocognitive and clinical relationship between compulsivity on gambling behavior. A sample of 552 non-treatment seeking gamblers age 18-29 was recruited from the community for a study on gambling in young adults. Gambling severity levels included both casual and disordered gamblers. All participants completed the Intra/Extra-Dimensional Set Shift (IED) task, from which the total adjusted errors were correlated with gambling severity measures, and linear regression modeling was used to assess three error measures from the task. The present analysis found significant positive correlations between problems with cognitive flexibility and gambling severity (reflected by the number of DSM-5 criteria, gambling frequency, amount of money lost in the past year, and gambling urge/behavior severity). IED errors also showed a positive correlation with self-reported compulsive behavior scores. A significant correlation was also found between IED errors and non-planning impulsivity from the BIS. Linear regression models based on total IED errors, extra-dimensional (ED) shift errors, or pre-ED shift errors indicated that these factors accounted for a significant portion of the variance noted in several variables. These findings suggest that cognitive flexibility may be an important consideration in the assessment of gamblers. Results from correlational and linear regression analyses support this possibility, but the exact contributions of both impulsivity and cognitive flexibility remain entangled. Future studies will ideally be able to assess the longitudinal relationships between gambling, compulsivity, and impulsivity, helping to clarify the relative contributions of both impulsive and compulsive features.

摘要

尽管赌博障碍(GD)通常被视为一种冲动性问题,但最近有人提出强迫性是成瘾性障碍的一个潜在重要特征。本分析评估了强迫性与赌博行为之间的神经认知和临床关系。从社区招募了552名年龄在18 - 29岁、未寻求治疗的赌徒样本,用于一项关于年轻人赌博的研究。赌博严重程度水平包括偶尔赌博者和有赌博障碍者。所有参与者都完成了维度内/维度间转换任务(IED),从中将总调整错误与赌博严重程度指标进行相关分析,并使用线性回归模型来评估该任务的三个错误指标。本分析发现认知灵活性问题与赌博严重程度之间存在显著正相关(由DSM - 5标准数量、赌博频率、过去一年输钱金额以及赌博冲动/行为严重程度反映)。IED错误也与自我报告的强迫行为得分呈正相关。IED错误与BIS中的非计划性冲动性之间也发现了显著相关性。基于总IED错误、维度间(ED)转换错误或ED转换前错误的线性回归模型表明,这些因素在几个变量中占了显著部分的方差。这些发现表明,认知灵活性可能是评估赌徒时的一个重要考量因素。相关分析和线性回归分析的结果支持了这种可能性,但冲动性和认知灵活性的确切作用仍相互交织。未来的研究理想情况下将能够评估赌博、强迫性和冲动性之间的纵向关系,有助于阐明冲动性和强迫性特征的相对作用。