Collins Tara Ann, Robertson Matthew P, Sicoutris Corinna P, Pisa Michael A, Holena Daniel N, Reilly Patrick M, Kohl Benjamin A
1 Department of Advanced Practice, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
2 University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia.
J Telemed Telecare. 2017 Feb;23(2):360-364. doi: 10.1177/1357633X16631846. Epub 2016 Jul 9.
Introduction There is an increased demand for intensive care unit (ICU) beds. We sought to determine if we could create a safe surge capacity model to increase ICU capacity by treating ICU patients in the post-anaesthesia care unit (PACU) utilizing a collaborative model between an ICU service and a telemedicine service during peak ICU bed demand. Methods We evaluated patients managed by the surgical critical care service in the surgical intensive care unit (SICU) compared to patients managed in the virtual intensive care unit (VICU) located within the PACU. A retrospective review of all patients seen by the surgical critical care service from January 1st 2008 to July 31st 2011 was conducted at an urban, academic, tertiary centre and level 1 trauma centre. Results Compared to the SICU group ( n = 6652), patients in the VICU group ( n = 1037) were slightly older (median age 60 (IQR 47-69) versus 58 (IQR 44-70) years, p = 0.002) and had lower acute physiology and chronic health evaluation (APACHE) II scores (median 10 (IQR 7-14) versus 15 (IQR 11-21), p < 0.001). The average amount of time patients spent in the VICU was 13.7 + /-9.6 hours. In the VICU group, 750 (72%) of patients were able to be transferred directly to the floor; 287 (28%) required subsequent admission to the surgical intensive care unit. All patients in the VICU group were alive upon transfer out of the PACU while mortality in the surgical intensive unit cohort was 5.5%. Discussion A collaborative care model between a surgical critical care service and a telemedicine ICU service may safely provide surge capacity during peak periods of ICU bed demand. The specific patient populations for which this approach is most appropriate merits further investigation.
引言 对重症监护病房(ICU)床位的需求不断增加。我们试图确定是否可以创建一个安全的应急能力模型,通过在ICU床位需求高峰期利用ICU服务和远程医疗服务之间的协作模式,在麻醉后护理单元(PACU)治疗ICU患者来增加ICU容量。方法 我们评估了在外科重症监护病房(SICU)由外科重症监护服务管理的患者与在PACU内的虚拟重症监护病房(VICU)管理的患者。在一家城市学术三级中心和一级创伤中心,对2008年1月1日至2011年7月31日期间外科重症监护服务所诊治的所有患者进行了回顾性研究。结果 与SICU组(n = 6652)相比,VICU组(n = 1037)的患者年龄稍大(中位年龄60岁(四分位间距47 - 69岁)对58岁(四分位间距44 - 70岁),p = 0.002),急性生理与慢性健康状况评估(APACHE)II评分较低(中位值10(四分位间距7 - 14)对15(四分位间距11 - 21),p < 0.001)。患者在VICU平均停留时间为13.7±9.6小时。在VICU组中,750名(72%)患者能够直接转至普通病房;287名(28%)患者随后需要入住外科重症监护病房。VICU组所有患者转出PACU时均存活,而外科重症监护病房队列的死亡率为5.5%。讨论 外科重症监护服务与远程医疗ICU服务之间的协作护理模式可能在ICU床位需求高峰期安全地提供应急能力。这种方法最适合的特定患者群体值得进一步研究。