Suri Y
Commandant, 166 Military Hospital, C/o 56 APO.
Med J Armed Forces India. 2001 Jul;57(3):213-4. doi: 10.1016/S0377-1237(01)80046-0. Epub 2011 Jul 21.
A single blind parallel group study was performed in 137 patients undergoing elective surgery under general anaesthesia to compare the efficacy and tolerability of midazolam 0.15 to 0.25 mg/kg or thiopentone 6 mg/kg. Induction time was 45.0±17.1 secs in midazolam group in comparison to 32.0±9.5 secs in thiopentone group and the frequency of apnoea was 11.5% and 17.1% respectively. There was no difference in the duration of apnoea in the two groups. No venous intolerance was experienced during the study. It appears that midazolam is a suitable alternative to thiopentone and would be of value where the latter is contraindicated.
对137例接受全身麻醉下择期手术的患者进行了一项单盲平行组研究,以比较0.15至0.25mg/kg咪达唑仑或6mg/kg硫喷妥钠的疗效和耐受性。咪达唑仑组的诱导时间为45.0±17.1秒,硫喷妥钠组为32.0±9.5秒,呼吸暂停发生率分别为11.5%和17.1%。两组的呼吸暂停持续时间无差异。研究期间未出现静脉不耐受情况。看来咪达唑仑是硫喷妥钠的合适替代品,在后者禁忌的情况下具有价值。