Demir Aynur, Kaya Ayşe Günay, Yavuz Bünyamin, Kantekin Çiğdem Ünal, Başar Hülya
Clinic of Anaesthesiology and Reanimation, Ankara Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
Clinic of Cardiology, Keçiören Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim. 2015 Apr;43(2):78-83. doi: 10.5152/TJAR.2014.34635. Epub 2015 Feb 5.
The aim of this study is to investigate the effects of bupivacaine and levobupivacaine, used to create epidural anaesthesia in inguinal hernia operations, on heart rate variability and cardiac arrhythmia parameters.
Sixty male patients of the American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) I-II group, scheduled to be operated on for inguinal hernia surgery with epidural anaesthesia, were randomly divided into two groups. The patients, with a 12-channel Holter recorder (Rozinn RZ153+12-USA) attached 1 hour before the operation to record until the end of the surgery, were taken into the preparation room and anaesthetised. In group L (n=30), 17 mL of 0.5% levobupivacaine (Chirocain 0.5%-Abbot, El-verum, Norway) was given into the epidural space within 10 minutes, versus 17 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine in (Marcain 0.5%, Astra Zeneca, İstanbul, Turkey) group B (n=30). After 30 minutes, when there was enough block, the operation had been started. Holter recordings, starting 1 hour before the anaesthetic procedure and completed by the end of the operations, were transferred to the computer. The records were evaluated by the cardiologists.
When analysing the frequency effect measurement results of the heart rate variability, it was seen that neither of the medications created any statistically significant change in or among the groups in total, very-low-frequency (VLF), low-frequency (LF), high-frequency (HF) and LF/HF ratio levels. Only normalised low-frequency band was significantly lower in Group L (p=0.013).
In the volumes and concentrations that were used in our study, levobupivacaine and bupivacaine created sensory blockade at the same level on average and did not reduce heart rate variability at the levels of these blockages.
本研究旨在探讨布比卡因和左旋布比卡因用于腹股沟疝手术硬膜外麻醉时对心率变异性和心律失常参数的影响。
将60例美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)I-II级、计划行腹股沟疝手术并采用硬膜外麻醉的男性患者随机分为两组。患者在手术前1小时佩戴12通道动态心电图记录仪(Rozinn RZ153+12-美国),记录至手术结束,然后被带入准备室并进行麻醉。L组(n=30)在10分钟内将17 mL 0.5%左旋布比卡因(耐乐品0.5%-雅培,挪威埃尔韦鲁姆)注入硬膜外腔,而B组(n=30)注入17 mL 0.5%布比卡因(麻卡因0.5%,阿斯利康,土耳其伊斯坦布尔)。30分钟后,当阻滞充分时开始手术。从麻醉 procedure前1小时开始并在手术结束时完成的动态心电图记录被传输到计算机。记录由心脏病专家进行评估。
在分析心率变异性的频率效应测量结果时,发现两种药物在总体、极低频(VLF)、低频(LF)、高频(HF)和LF/HF比值水平上均未在组内或组间产生任何统计学上的显著变化。仅L组的标准化低频带显著较低(p=0.013)。
在我们研究中使用的剂量和浓度下,左旋布比卡因和布比卡因平均产生相同水平的感觉阻滞,且在这些阻滞水平下均未降低心率变异性。