Richard Ann M, Judson Richard S, Houck Keith A, Grulke Christopher M, Volarath Patra, Thillainadarajah Inthirany, Yang Chihae, Rathman James, Martin Matthew T, Wambaugh John F, Knudsen Thomas B, Kancherla Jayaram, Mansouri Kamel, Patlewicz Grace, Williams Antony J, Little Stephen B, Crofton Kevin M, Thomas Russell S
National Center for Computational Toxicology, Office of Research & Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency , Mail Code B205-01, Research Triangle Park, Durham, North Carolina 27711, United States.
Center for Food Safety and Nutrition, U.S. Food and Drug Administration , 5100 Paint Branch Parkway, College Park, Maryland 20740, United States.
Chem Res Toxicol. 2016 Aug 15;29(8):1225-51. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrestox.6b00135. Epub 2016 Jul 20.
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) ToxCast program is testing a large library of Agency-relevant chemicals using in vitro high-throughput screening (HTS) approaches to support the development of improved toxicity prediction models. Launched in 2007, Phase I of the program screened 310 chemicals, mostly pesticides, across hundreds of ToxCast assay end points. In Phase II, the ToxCast library was expanded to 1878 chemicals, culminating in the public release of screening data at the end of 2013. Subsequent expansion in Phase III has resulted in more than 3800 chemicals actively undergoing ToxCast screening, 96% of which are also being screened in the multi-Agency Tox21 project. The chemical library unpinning these efforts plays a central role in defining the scope and potential application of ToxCast HTS results. The history of the phased construction of EPA's ToxCast library is reviewed, followed by a survey of the library contents from several different vantage points. CAS Registry Numbers are used to assess ToxCast library coverage of important toxicity, regulatory, and exposure inventories. Structure-based representations of ToxCast chemicals are then used to compute physicochemical properties, substructural features, and structural alerts for toxicity and biotransformation. Cheminformatics approaches using these varied representations are applied to defining the boundaries of HTS testability, evaluating chemical diversity, and comparing the ToxCast library to potential target application inventories, such as used in EPA's Endocrine Disruption Screening Program (EDSP). Through several examples, the ToxCast chemical library is demonstrated to provide comprehensive coverage of the knowledge domains and target inventories of potential interest to EPA. Furthermore, the varied representations and approaches presented here define local chemistry domains potentially worthy of further investigation (e.g., not currently covered in the testing library or defined by toxicity "alerts") to strategically support data mining and predictive toxicology modeling moving forward.
美国环境保护局(EPA)的ToxCast项目正在使用体外高通量筛选(HTS)方法测试大量与该机构相关的化学品库,以支持改进毒性预测模型的开发。该项目于2007年启动,第一阶段对310种化学品进行了筛选,其中大部分是农药,涵盖了数百个ToxCast测定终点。在第二阶段,ToxCast化学品库扩展到1878种化学品,并于2013年底公开发布了筛选数据。随后在第三阶段的扩展使得超过3800种化学品正在接受ToxCast筛选,其中96%也在多机构的Tox21项目中进行筛选。支撑这些工作的化学品库在确定ToxCast HTS结果的范围和潜在应用方面发挥着核心作用。本文回顾了EPA的ToxCast化学品库分阶段建设的历史,随后从几个不同的角度对库内容进行了调查。使用化学物质登记号来评估ToxCast化学品库对重要毒性、监管和暴露清单的覆盖范围。然后,利用ToxCast化学品的基于结构的表示来计算物理化学性质、亚结构特征以及毒性和生物转化的结构警示。使用这些不同表示的化学信息学方法被应用于定义HTS可测试性的边界、评估化学多样性以及将ToxCast化学品库与潜在的目标应用清单进行比较,例如EPA的内分泌干扰物筛选计划(EDSP)中使用的清单。通过几个例子表明,ToxCast化学品库能够全面覆盖EPA可能感兴趣的知识领域和目标清单。此外,本文提出的不同表示和方法定义了可能值得进一步研究的局部化学领域(例如,目前测试库中未涵盖或由毒性“警示”定义的领域),以便从战略上支持数据挖掘和预测毒理学建模的发展。