• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于计算机的培训对接受牙冠治疗患者刷牙技能的有效性:一项随机对照试验。

Effectiveness of Computer-Based Training on Toothbrush Skills of Patients Treated With Crowns: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

作者信息

Deinzer Renate, Harnacke Daniela, Mengel Reiner, Telzer Maria, Lotzmann Ulrich, Wöstmann Bernd

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Institute of Medical Psychology, Justus Liebig University Giessen, Giessen, Germany.

Department of Prosthetic and Orofacial Function, School of Dental Medicine, Philipps University, Marburg/Lahn, Germany.

出版信息

J Periodontol. 2016 Nov;87(11):1333-1342. doi: 10.1902/jop.2016.160099. Epub 2016 Jul 1.

DOI:10.1902/jop.2016.160099
PMID:27367422
Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study was conducted to assess plaque removal skills in patients with fixed dental prostheses (FDP), and effectiveness of computer-based training (CBT) of different brushing techniques (Fones versus Bass technique in their common modifications).

METHODS

Ninety-three patients with FDP were randomly allocated to one of three training groups: 1) C (control group); 2) F (Fones technique group); and 3) B (Bass technique group). All patients received CBT of the basics of toothbrushing. Group C received no further instructions while groups F and B received additional CBT of the modified Fones or the modified Bass technique, respectively. Plaque levels were assessed immediately after patients had been asked to perform oral hygiene to the best of their abilities.

RESULTS

Prior to training, persistent plaque deposits were found at 80% of marginal sites of natural teeth immediately after patients had performed oral hygiene. Considerably fewer plaque deposits were found on FDP (43%). No significant group differences were observed 6 and 12 weeks after training, either for natural teeth or for FDP (all P >0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Plaque removal skills are low in patients with FDP. Apparently, they do not profit from CBT of the techniques studied here. Studies observing their actual brushing behavior should be conducted to elucidate reasons for their deficits and to explore why CBT does not work in this group of patients.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在评估固定义齿(FDP)患者的牙菌斑清除技能,以及基于计算机的不同刷牙技术(改良的Fones法与改良的Bass法)培训(CBT)的效果。

方法

93例FDP患者被随机分配到三个训练组之一:1)C组(对照组);2)F组(Fones技术组);3)B组(Bass技术组)。所有患者均接受了刷牙基本知识的CBT培训。C组未接受进一步指导,而F组和B组分别接受了改良Fones技术或改良Bass技术的额外CBT培训。在患者被要求尽最大能力进行口腔卫生清洁后,立即评估牙菌斑水平。

结果

训练前,患者进行口腔卫生清洁后,天然牙边缘部位80%存在持续性牙菌斑沉积。FDP上发现的牙菌斑沉积明显较少(43%)。训练6周和12周后,无论是天然牙还是FDP,各组之间均未观察到显著差异(所有P>0.05)。

结论

FDP患者的牙菌斑清除技能较低。显然,他们并未从这里研究的技术的CBT培训中获益。应开展观察其实际刷牙行为的研究,以阐明其缺陷的原因,并探讨为何CBT在这组患者中不起作用。

相似文献

1
Effectiveness of Computer-Based Training on Toothbrush Skills of Patients Treated With Crowns: A Randomized Controlled Trial.基于计算机的培训对接受牙冠治疗患者刷牙技能的有效性:一项随机对照试验。
J Periodontol. 2016 Nov;87(11):1333-1342. doi: 10.1902/jop.2016.160099. Epub 2016 Jul 1.
2
Training in different brushing techniques in relation to efficacy of oral hygiene in young adults: a randomized controlled trial.针对年轻成年人不同刷牙技巧对口腔卫生效果的影响的培训:一项随机对照试验。
J Clin Periodontol. 2016 Jan;43(1):46-52. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12489. Epub 2016 Feb 5.
3
Improving oral hygiene skills by computer-based training: a randomized controlled comparison of the modified Bass and the Fones techniques.通过基于计算机的培训来提高口腔卫生技能:改良 Bass 法与 Fones 技术的随机对照比较。
PLoS One. 2012;7(5):e37072. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0037072. Epub 2012 May 21.
4
Comparison of modified bass, rolling, and current toothbrushing techniques for the efficacy of plaque control - A randomized trial.改良巴氏刷牙法、横向颤动拂刷法和圆弧刷牙法对菌斑控制效果的比较——一项随机试验。
J Dent. 2023 Aug;135:104571. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2023.104571. Epub 2023 Jun 2.
5
Toothbrushing education via a smart software visualization system.通过智能软件可视化系统进行刷牙教育。
J Periodontol. 2013 Feb;84(2):186-95. doi: 10.1902/jop.2012.110675. Epub 2012 Mar 16.
6
The miswak (chewing stick) and oral health. Studies on oral hygiene practices of urban Saudi Arabians.米斯瓦克(咀嚼棒)与口腔健康。沙特阿拉伯城市居民口腔卫生习惯研究。
Swed Dent J Suppl. 2004(167):2-75.
7
Efficacy of three toothbrushes on established gingivitis and plaque.三种牙刷对已患牙龈炎和牙菌斑的疗效。
Am J Dent. 2008 Dec;21(6):339-45.
8
Comparison of irrigation to floss as an adjunct to tooth brushing: effect on bleeding, gingivitis, and supragingival plaque.将冲洗与牙线作为刷牙辅助手段的比较:对出血、牙龈炎和龈上菌斑的影响。
J Clin Dent. 2005;16(3):71-7.
9
Comparison of the use of different modes of mechanical oral hygiene in prevention of plaque and gingivitis.不同机械口腔卫生模式在预防牙菌斑和牙龈炎中的应用比较。
J Periodontol. 2008 Aug;79(8):1386-94. doi: 10.1902/jop.2008.070654.
10
Six-month comparison of powered versus manual toothbrushing for safety and efficacy in the absence of professional instruction in mechanical plaque control.在缺乏机械菌斑控制专业指导的情况下,电动牙刷与手动牙刷安全性和有效性的六个月比较。
J Periodontol. 2002 Jul;73(7):770-8. doi: 10.1902/jop.2002.73.7.770.

引用本文的文献

1
Toothbrushing behavior over time: A correlational analysis of repeatedly assessed brushing performance.随时间变化的刷牙行为:对重复评估的刷牙表现的相关性分析。
PLoS One. 2024 Dec 19;19(12):e0296724. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0296724. eCollection 2024.
2
Manual toothbrushing techniques for plaque removal and the prevention of gingivitis-A systematic review with network meta-analysis.手动刷牙技术去除牙菌斑和预防牙龈炎——系统评价与网络荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2024 Jul 5;19(7):e0306302. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0306302. eCollection 2024.
3
"You should brush your teeth better": a randomized controlled trial comparing best-possible versus as-usual toothbrushing.
“你应该更好地刷牙”:一项比较最佳可能刷牙和常规刷牙的随机对照试验。
BMC Oral Health. 2023 Jul 6;23(1):456. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-03127-3.
4
Behavioral Interventions on Periodontitis Patients to Improve Oral Hygiene: A Systematic Review.改善牙周炎患者口腔卫生的行为干预措施:一项系统评价
J Clin Med. 2023 Mar 15;12(6):2276. doi: 10.3390/jcm12062276.
5
Patients' awareness regarding the quality of their oral hygiene: development and validation of a new measurement instrument.患者对口腔卫生质量的认知:新测量工具的开发与验证。
BMC Oral Health. 2022 Dec 22;22(1):629. doi: 10.1186/s12903-022-02659-4.
6
What characterizes effective tooth brushing of daily users of powered versus manual toothbrushes?日常使用电动牙刷和手动牙刷的人群,其有效刷牙的特点是什么?
BMC Oral Health. 2022 Jan 16;22(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s12903-022-02045-0.
7
Characterizing the Content Related to Oral Health Education on TikTok.分析 TikTok 上与口腔健康教育相关的内容
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Dec 16;18(24):13260. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182413260.
8
Good role models? Tooth brushing capabilities of parents: a video observation study.好榜样?父母的刷牙能力:一项视频观察研究。
BMC Oral Health. 2021 Sep 24;21(1):469. doi: 10.1186/s12903-021-01823-6.
9
Effectiveness of Manual Toothbrushing Techniques on Plaque and Gingivitis: A Systematic Review.手动刷牙技术对牙菌斑和牙龈炎的有效性:一项系统评价。
Oral Health Prev Dent. 2020 Oct 2;18(4):843-854. doi: 10.3290/j.ohpd.a45354.
10
Oral cleanliness in daily users of powered vs. manual toothbrushes - a cross-sectional study.日常使用电动牙刷与手动牙刷人群的口腔清洁状况 - 一项横断面研究。
BMC Oral Health. 2019 May 29;19(1):96. doi: 10.1186/s12903-019-0790-9.