Suppr超能文献

非处方机械式鼻腔扩张器的比较:一项系统评价

A Comparison of Over-the-Counter Mechanical Nasal Dilators: A Systematic Review.

作者信息

Kiyohara Nicole, Badger Christopher, Tjoa Tjoson, Wong Brian

机构信息

School of Medicine, University of California-Irvine2Beckman Laser Institute and Medical Clinic, University of California-Irvine.

Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Boston.

出版信息

JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2016 Sep 1;18(5):385-9. doi: 10.1001/jamafacial.2016.0291.

Abstract

IMPORTANCE

The internal nasal valve is the narrowest part of the nasal airway and a common site of inspiratory collapse and obstruction of nasal airflow. Over-the-counter mechanical nasal dilators are an alternative to surgical intervention that attempts to improve airflow through the internal nasal valve.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the efficacy of over-the-counter mechanical nasal dilators and classify these products by mechanism.

EVIDENCE REVIEW

A database of 33 available over-the-counter mechanical nasal dilators was generated via a PubMed search as well as an internet search via Amazon.com and Google, conducted from April 1, 2013, through December 31, 2015. Products determined to be unavailable or discontinued were excluded from the database. Of the devices examined in published literature, efficacy was based on objective measures, such as measured airflow, the cross-sectional area of the nasal valve, and changes in resistance. Measures of reported sleep quality or patient perception were excluded.

FINDINGS

An analysis of each product's mechanism revealed 4 broad classes: external nasal dilator strips, nasal stents, nasal clips, and septal stimulators. A review demonstrated 5 studies supporting the use of external nasal dilator strips, 4 studies supporting the use of nasal clips, 1 study supporting the use of nasal stents, and no studies supporting the use of septal stimulators.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Our findings suggest that external nasal dilator strips and nasal clips effectively relieve obstruction of the internal nasal valve and may be an alternative to surgical intervention in some patients.

摘要

重要性

鼻内瓣膜是鼻气道最狭窄的部分,是吸气时鼻气流塌陷和阻塞的常见部位。非处方机械性鼻扩张器是一种手术干预的替代方法,旨在改善通过鼻内瓣膜的气流。

目的

确定非处方机械性鼻扩张器的疗效,并根据作用机制对这些产品进行分类。

证据综述

通过PubMed搜索以及2013年4月1日至2015年12月31日期间通过亚马逊网站和谷歌进行的互联网搜索,生成了一个包含33种可用非处方机械性鼻扩张器的数据库。确定不可用或已停产的产品被排除在数据库之外。在已发表文献中研究的设备,疗效基于客观测量,如测量的气流、鼻瓣膜的横截面积和阻力变化。排除报告的睡眠质量或患者感知的测量。

结果

对每种产品作用机制的分析揭示了4大类:外部鼻扩张条、鼻支架、鼻夹和鼻中隔刺激器。一项综述表明有5项研究支持使用外部鼻扩张条,4项研究支持使用鼻夹,1项研究支持使用鼻支架,没有研究支持使用鼻中隔刺激器。

结论及意义

我们的研究结果表明,外部鼻扩张条和鼻夹可有效缓解鼻内瓣膜阻塞,并可能是一些患者手术干预的替代方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验