• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

异步视频面试作为人员选拔中的一项新技术:求职者的视角。

Asynchronous Video Interviewing as a New Technology in Personnel Selection: The Applicant's Point of View.

作者信息

Brenner Falko S, Ortner Tuulia M, Fay Doris

机构信息

Institute of Psychology, Freie Universität Berlin Berlin, Germany.

Department of Psychology, University of Salzburg Salzburg, Austria.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2016 Jun 14;7:863. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00863. eCollection 2016.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00863
PMID:27378969
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4906051/
Abstract

The present study aimed to integrate findings from technology acceptance research with research on applicant reactions to new technology for the emerging selection procedure of asynchronous video interviewing. One hundred six volunteers experienced asynchronous video interviewing and filled out several questionnaires including one on the applicants' personalities. In line with previous technology acceptance research, the data revealed that perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use predicted attitudes toward asynchronous video interviewing. Furthermore, openness revealed to moderate the relation between perceived usefulness and attitudes toward this particular selection technology. No significant effects emerged for computer self-efficacy, job interview self-efficacy, extraversion, neuroticism, and conscientiousness. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed.

摘要

本研究旨在将技术接受度研究的结果与关于求职者对新兴异步视频面试选拔程序中新技术反应的研究相结合。106名志愿者体验了异步视频面试,并填写了几份问卷,包括一份关于求职者个性的问卷。与之前的技术接受度研究一致,数据显示,感知有用性和感知易用性预测了对异步视频面试的态度。此外,开放性被发现调节了感知有用性与对这种特定选拔技术的态度之间的关系。计算机自我效能感、求职面试自我效能感、外向性、神经质和尽责性均未产生显著影响。本文讨论了理论和实践意义。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a734/4906051/1390878396ac/fpsyg-07-00863-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a734/4906051/1390878396ac/fpsyg-07-00863-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a734/4906051/1390878396ac/fpsyg-07-00863-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Asynchronous Video Interviewing as a New Technology in Personnel Selection: The Applicant's Point of View.异步视频面试作为人员选拔中的一项新技术:求职者的视角。
Front Psychol. 2016 Jun 14;7:863. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00863. eCollection 2016.
2
Selling and Smooth-Talking: Effects of Interviewer Impression Management from a Signaling Perspective.推销与花言巧语:从信号角度看面试官印象管理的影响
Front Psychol. 2017 May 29;8:740. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00740. eCollection 2017.
3
Applicant Personality and Procedural Justice Perceptions of Group Selection Interviews.群体选拔面试中申请人的个性与程序公平感
J Bus Psychol. 2016;31(4):569-582. doi: 10.1007/s10869-015-9430-9. Epub 2015 Dec 23.
4
An exploration of applicant perceptions of asynchronous video MMIs in medical selection.医学选拔中申请人对异步视频多迷你面试的认知探索。
MedEdPublish (2016). 2018 Dec 14;7:285. doi: 10.15694/mep.2018.0000285.1. eCollection 2018.
5
Applicant Fairness Perceptions of a Robot-Mediated Job Interview: A Video Vignette-Based Experimental Survey.求职者对机器人介导的求职面试的公平感认知:基于视频短片的实验性调查
Front Robot AI. 2020 Nov 11;7:586263. doi: 10.3389/frobt.2020.586263. eCollection 2020.
6
Virtual Interviewing Tips for the Otolaryngology Match Cycle During the COVID-19 Pandemic.COVID-19大流行期间耳鼻喉科住院医师匹配周期的虚拟面试技巧
OTO Open. 2021 Feb 2;5(1):2473974X21991455. doi: 10.1177/2473974X21991455. eCollection 2021 Jan-Mar.
7
The Orthopaedic Surgery Residency Application Process: An Analysis of the Applicant Experience.骨科住院医师申请流程:申请人体验分析。
J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2018 Aug 1;26(15):537-544. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-16-00835.
8
The effects of applicant's health status and qualifications on simulated hiring decisions.求职者的健康状况和资质对模拟招聘决策的影响。
Int J Obes. 1990 Jun;14(6):527-35.
9
Applicant Reactions to the AAMC Standardized Video Interview During the 2018 Application Cycle.申请人对 2018 申请周期中 AAMC 标准化视频面试的反应。
Acad Med. 2019 Oct;94(10):1498-1505. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002842.
10
Personality, biographical characteristics, and job interview success: a longitudinal study of the mediating effects of interviewing self-efficacy and the moderating effects of internal locus of causality.人格、传记特征与求职面试成功:关于面试自我效能的中介作用和因果关系内在控制点的调节作用的纵向研究
J Appl Psychol. 2006 Mar;91(2):446-54. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.91.2.446.

引用本文的文献

1
Why Do Applicants (Dis)Like Selection Methods? The Role of Stimulus and Response Format for Need Satisfaction.为什么求职者喜欢(或不喜欢)选拔方法?刺激因素和反应形式对需求满足的作用。
J Bus Psychol. 2025;40(4):995-1016. doi: 10.1007/s10869-024-10002-7. Epub 2025 Jan 23.
2
Opportunities and challenges of asynchronous video interviews: Perceptions of human resources professionals from Türkiye.异步视频面试的机遇与挑战:来自土耳其的人力资源专业人士的看法
PLoS One. 2025 Jun 10;20(6):e0325932. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0325932. eCollection 2025.
3
An exploration of applicant perceptions of asynchronous video MMIs in medical selection.

本文引用的文献

1
Self-efficacy moderates the mediation of intentions into behavior via plans.自我效能通过计划调节意图对行为的中介作用。
Am J Health Behav. 2009 Sep-Oct;33(5):521-9. doi: 10.5993/ajhb.33.5.5.
2
Thin slices of negotiation: predicting outcomes from conversational dynamics within the first 5 minutes.谈判的细微片段:通过最初5分钟内的对话动态预测结果
J Appl Psychol. 2007 May;92(3):802-11. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.92.3.802.
3
Thin slices of behavior as cues of personality and intelligence.作为人格和智力线索的行为薄片。
医学选拔中申请人对异步视频多迷你面试的认知探索。
MedEdPublish (2016). 2018 Dec 14;7:285. doi: 10.15694/mep.2018.0000285.1. eCollection 2018.
4
Cross-sectional evaluation of an asynchronous multiple mini-interview (MMI) in selection to health professions training programmes with 10 principles for fairness built-in.纳入 10 项公平原则的异步式多站式面试(MMI)在选择医疗卫生专业培训项目中的横断面评估。
BMJ Open. 2023 Oct 31;13(10):e074440. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-074440.
5
A Comparison of Conventional and Technology-Mediated Selection Interviews With Regard to Interviewees' Performance, Perceptions, Strain, and Anxiety.传统面试与技术介导的选拔面试在面试者表现、认知、压力和焦虑方面的比较
Front Psychol. 2021 Jan 12;11:603632. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.603632. eCollection 2020.
6
It Takes More Than a Good Camera: Which Factors Contribute to Differences Between Face-to-Face Interviews and Videoconference Interviews Regarding Performance Ratings and Interviewee Perceptions?不仅仅需要一台好相机:哪些因素导致面对面面试和视频会议面试在绩效评估和受访者认知方面存在差异?
J Bus Psychol. 2021;36(5):921-940. doi: 10.1007/s10869-020-09714-3. Epub 2020 Sep 10.
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2004 Apr;86(4):599-614. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.86.4.599.
4
Applicant reactions to face-to-face and technology-mediated interviews: a field investigation.
J Appl Psychol. 2003 Oct;88(5):944-53. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.944.
5
Personality and leadership: a qualitative and quantitative review.个性与领导力:一项定性与定量综述。
J Appl Psychol. 2002 Aug;87(4):765-80. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.87.4.765.
6
Five-factor model of personality and job satisfaction: a meta-analysis.人格五因素模型与工作满意度:一项元分析
J Appl Psychol. 2002 Jun;87(3):530-41. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.87.3.530.