Rendell M S, Katims J J, Richter R, Rowland F
Creighton University School of Medicine, Omaha, Neb.
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1989 Apr;52(4):502-11. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.52.4.502.
Nerve conduction velocities (NCVs) are the standard measurements used to confirm the presence or absence of diabetic neuropathy. NCVs were contrasted with the newer technique of measurement of alternating current perception thresholds (CPTs) in assessing the quantitative level of correlation with severity of diabetic sensory neuropathy. A very detailed, scored neurological history (symptoms) and physical examination, emphasising sensory assessment, was conducted on 71 individuals with diabetic neuropathy of varying degrees of severity. Sensory and motor NCVs and CPTs at 5, 250, and 2000 Hz of the upper and lower extremities were determined for these individuals. In addition, vibration thresholds (VTs) were measured as a third modality. Twenty eight individuals underwent repeated evaluations at 2, 6, 10 and 12 months after the initial procedures. Using the results of 169 complete evaluations, correlations were determined between physical scores (PS) and symptoms scores (SS) and NCVs. NCV correlations with the SS were weaker than with the PS. The strongest of the correlations were found between the PS and motor NCVs of the median nerve (rho = 0.29) and the tibial nerve (rho = 0.38). Normal NCVs were present in the face of very significant historical and physical abnormality. Correlations of the SS and PS with both VTs and CPTs were higher than with the NCVs. CPTs proved the more effective as predictors of both symptomatic and physical impairment. NCVs appear to lack the resolving power necessary to evaluate subtle differences in clinical state of diabetic sensory neuropathy. The supplementary use of current perception testing may improve the quantitative assessment of this condition.
神经传导速度(NCV)是用于确认糖尿病性神经病变是否存在的标准测量方法。在评估与糖尿病性感觉神经病变严重程度的定量相关性时,将NCV与测量交流感知阈值(CPT)的新技术进行了对比。对71名患有不同严重程度糖尿病性神经病变的个体进行了非常详细的、有评分的神经病史(症状)和体格检查,重点是感觉评估。测定了这些个体上下肢在5、250和2000Hz时的感觉和运动神经传导速度以及CPT。此外,还测量了振动阈值(VT)作为第三种方式。28名个体在初次检查后2、6、10和12个月进行了重复评估。利用169次完整评估的结果,确定了体格评分(PS)和症状评分(SS)与神经传导速度之间的相关性。神经传导速度与症状评分的相关性弱于与体格评分的相关性。在体格评分与正中神经运动神经传导速度(rho = 0.29)和胫神经运动神经传导速度(rho = 0.38)之间发现了最强的相关性。尽管存在非常明显的病史和体格异常,但神经传导速度仍正常。症状评分和体格评分与振动阈值和交流感知阈值的相关性均高于与神经传导速度的相关性。交流感知阈值被证明是症状性和体格损害更有效的预测指标。神经传导速度似乎缺乏评估糖尿病性感觉神经病变临床状态细微差异所需的分辨能力。补充使用电流感知测试可能会改善对这种疾病的定量评估。