Hyun Hong-Keun, Ferracane Jack L
Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Dental Research Institute, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University, Seoul National University Dental Hospital, 101 Daehakno, Jongno-gu, Seoul 03080, Republic of Korea.
Division of Biomaterials and Biomechanics, Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Oregon Health & Science University, 2730 S.W. Moody Avenue, Portland, OR 97201, USA.
Dent Mater. 2016 Sep;32(9):1144-51. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2016.06.011. Epub 2016 Jul 7.
Bioactive glass (BAG) has been suggested as a possible additive for dental restorative materials because of its antimicrobial effect and potential for promoting apatite formation in body fluids. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of bacterial biofilm on the change of colorimetric value and translucency of novel BAG-containing composites having different initial surface roughness.
Composites with 72wt% total filler load were prepared by replacing 15% of the silanized Sr glass with BAG (65 mol % Si; 4% P; 31% Ca), BAG-F (61% Si; 31% Ca; 4% P; 3% F; 1% B), or silanized silica. Light-cured discs of 2-mm thickness (n=10/group) were divided into 4 different surface roughness subgroups produced by wet polishing with 600 and then up to 1200, 2400, or 4000 grit SiC. CIE Lab* were measured and the color difference and translucency parameter (TP) were calculated before and after incubating in media with or without a Streptococcus mutans (UA 159) biofilm for 2 wks (no agitation). Results were analyzed using ANOVA/Tukey's test (α=0.05).
All the color differences for BAG and BAG-F composite showed significant decreases with bacterial biofilm compared to media-only. The mean TP (SD) of BAG and BAG-F composite before aging [10.0 (2.8) and 8.5 (1.4)] was higher than that of the control composite [4.9 (0.8)], while the change in TP with aging was greater compared to the control with or without bacteria. BAG-F composites with the smoothest surfaces showed a greater decrease in TP under bacterial biofilm compared to the BAG composite.
Highly polished dental composites containing bioactive glass additives may become slightly rougher and show reduced translucency when exposed to bacterial biofilms, but do not discolor any more than control composites that do not contain the BAG.
生物活性玻璃(BAG)因其抗菌作用以及在体液中促进磷灰石形成的潜力,已被提议作为牙科修复材料的一种可能添加剂。本研究的目的是调查细菌生物膜对具有不同初始表面粗糙度的新型含BAG复合材料的比色值和透明度变化的影响。
通过用BAG(65摩尔%硅;4%磷;31%钙)、BAG-F(61%硅;31%钙;4%磷;3%氟;1%硼)或硅烷化二氧化硅替代15%的硅烷化锶玻璃,制备了总填料含量为72wt%的复合材料。将2毫米厚的光固化圆盘(每组n = 10)分为4个不同的表面粗糙度亚组,通过先用600目然后依次用1200、2400或4000目碳化硅进行湿抛光制备。在含有或不含有变形链球菌(UA 159)生物膜的培养基中孵育2周(不搅拌)之前和之后,测量CIE Lab*值,并计算色差和透明度参数(TP)。使用方差分析/图基检验(α = 0.05)分析结果。
与仅培养基相比,BAG和BAG-F复合材料的所有色差在有细菌生物膜时均显著降低。老化前BAG和BAG-F复合材料的平均TP(标准差)[10.0(2.8)和8.5(1.4)]高于对照复合材料[4.9(0.8)],而与有或没有细菌的对照相比,老化时TP的变化更大。表面最光滑的BAG-F复合材料在细菌生物膜作用下的TP降低幅度比BAG复合材料更大。
含有生物活性玻璃添加剂的高度抛光牙科复合材料在暴露于细菌生物膜时可能会变得稍微粗糙一些,透明度降低,但不会比不含BAG的对照复合材料变色更多。