Sremac Srdjan
Department of Theology and Religious Studies, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1105, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Pastoral Psychol. 2016;65:555-567. doi: 10.1007/s11089-016-0692-6. Epub 2016 Apr 28.
Although the spiritual vibration of conversion can be felt (by the curious outsider) through what conversion performers say in their testimonial discourse, what transforms the convert 'on stage' into a 'new being' and what is 'the real' () in conversion performance remain unclear. An important question in this connection is, What is 'real' in a conversion representation, both with respect to the convert's interaction with the audience and to the construction of social reality? Following Lacan's tripartite register of the imaginary, the symbolic, and the real, in this essay I argue that through testimonial discourse converts construct social reality as an answer to the impossibility of 'the real' in their performative discursive practice. In the first part, I question the constructed nature of testimonial representations-as well as some academic knowledge production that has governed conversion research in the last few decades-and how these representations encourage 'outsiders' to read the narrative repertoire as a negation or mirroring 'the real' of the conversion experience. In the second part, I apply Roland Barthes' analytic reflections on photography to conversion research, especially the notions of the (the common ground of cultural meanings) and the (a personal experience that inspires private meaning). This brings me to a number of theorists (mostly never used in the field of religious conversion)-Jacques Lacan, Roland Barthes, and Slavoj Žižek-who are important to the perspective that is developed in this essay.
尽管(好奇的局外人)可以通过改宗者在其见证话语中所说的内容感受到改宗的精神振动,但在“舞台上”将改宗者转变为“新人”的因素以及改宗表演中“真实的东西”(是什么)仍然不清楚。在这方面,一个重要的问题是,在改宗表现中,就改宗者与观众的互动以及社会现实的建构而言,“真实的东西”是什么?遵循拉康关于想象界、象征界和实在界的三重架构,在本文中我认为,通过见证话语,改宗者建构社会现实,作为对其表演性话语实践中“实在”之不可能性的回应。在第一部分,我质疑见证表述的建构性质——以及过去几十年来主导改宗研究的一些学术知识生产——以及这些表述如何鼓励“局外人”将叙事剧目解读为对改宗经历“真实”的否定或映照。在第二部分,我将罗兰·巴特对摄影的分析思考应用于改宗研究,特别是“刺点”(文化意义的共同基础)和“意趣点”(激发个人意义的个人经历)的概念。这使我接触到一些理论家(大多从未在宗教改宗领域使用过)——雅克·拉康、罗兰·巴特和斯拉沃热·齐泽克——他们对本文所发展的观点很重要。