Gekle H
Psyche (Stuttg). 1995 Aug;49(8):705-26.
Lacan places the concept of the imaginary alongside the categories of the real and the symbolic. This concept plays a highly prominent role in his thinking, given that the essential determination of the imaginary is the primary relation of the ego to the image of the similar. Thus it is not surprising that unlike Freud the early Lacan acceded to the status of theoretician of surrealism, his decentralization of the cogito having a profound effect on Dalí in particular. The author shows that non-identity and paranoic anamorphosis are only conceivable as the forms of the imaginary absolutised by Lacan if they are seen in relation to an Oedipally constructed cogito--just as mannerism regularly follows classicism and cannot be conceived of separately from it. If Freud was a classicist, Lacan was the mannerist who came after him--except that the latter refused to countenance this connection.
拉康将想象界的概念与实在界和象征界的范畴并列。鉴于想象界的本质规定是自我与相似形象的原初关系，这个概念在他的思想中扮演着极为突出的角色。因此，早期拉康不同于弗洛伊德，他成为了超现实主义理论家，这并不奇怪，他对主体的去中心化尤其对达利产生了深远影响。作者表明，非同一性和偏执性变形只有在与俄狄浦斯式构建的主体相关联时，才能够被设想为拉康所绝对化的想象界的形式——正如风格主义通常追随古典主义，且无法与之分开来设想一样。如果说弗洛伊德是古典主义者，那么拉康就是追随其后的风格主义者——只是后者拒绝承认这种关联。
