• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对精神卫生服务使用者癌症筛查接受情况的影响:一项定性研究。

Influences on uptake of cancer screening in mental health service users: a qualitative study.

作者信息

Clifton Abigail, Burgess Caroline, Clement Sarah, Ohlsen Ruth, Ramluggun Pras, Sturt Jackie, Walters Paul, Barley Elizabeth A

机构信息

Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, King's College London, 57 Waterloo Road, London, SE1 8WA, UK.

Division of Health and Social Care Research, Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, King's College London, Addison House, Guy's Campus, London Bridge, London, SE1 1UL, UK.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Jul 12;16:257. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1505-4.

DOI:10.1186/s12913-016-1505-4
PMID:27405348
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4942968/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Cancers are a leading cause of death worldwide. People with mental illness are 30 % more likely to die from cancer than the general population. One reason for this may be low uptake of nationally offered cancer screening tests by people with mental illness. We aimed to identify barriers and facilitators for breast, cervical and bowel cancer screening uptake by people with mental illness in order to inform interventions to promote equal access.

METHODS

The interview study was conducted in both urban and rural settings. The study was informed by the Theoretical Domains Framework, using framework analysis and triangulation across participant groups. Participants included 45 mental health service users (service users) eligible for cancer screening, 29 mental health professionals and 11 professionals involved in cancer screening.

RESULTS

Themes emerging from the data that affected uptake included knowledge of screening programmes by both service users and healthcare providers; knowledge of, and attitudes towards, mental illness; health service-delivery factors; service users' beliefs and concerns about cancer screening, and practical issues. These are relevant to different stages of the screening process. Service users do not receive invitations to screening or cancer testing kits if they are admitted to hospital. They are not routinely invited for screening if they are not registered with a general practitioner (GP). Lack of integrated care means that mental health staff do not know if someone is overdue for a test and cancer screening is often not considered during health promotion. Barriers including information processing problems, the extent to which the screening process aggravates symptoms, poor staff client relationships and travel difficulties vary between individuals. Screening professionals are motivated to help, but may lack time or training to manage mental health needs. Reactive measures are available, but service users must request help which they may find difficult.

CONCLUSIONS

There are specific barriers to cancer screening uptake for mental health service users that prevent equality of care. Interventions that can be personalised are needed at individual, policy and service-delivery levels. Primary and secondary care staff and policy-makers should work together to develop an integrated approach to cancer screening in this population.

摘要

背景

癌症是全球主要死因之一。患有精神疾病的人死于癌症的可能性比普通人群高30%。其原因之一可能是患有精神疾病的人对国家提供的癌症筛查测试接受率较低。我们旨在确定患有精神疾病的人接受乳腺癌、宫颈癌和肠癌筛查的障碍及促进因素,以便为促进平等获取筛查服务的干预措施提供依据。

方法

访谈研究在城市和农村地区均有开展。该研究以理论领域框架为依据,采用框架分析法并在不同参与群体间进行三角互证。参与者包括45名符合癌症筛查条件的精神卫生服务使用者(服务对象)、29名精神卫生专业人员以及11名参与癌症筛查的专业人员。

结果

数据中出现的影响筛查接受率的主题包括服务对象和医疗服务提供者对筛查项目的了解;对精神疾病的了解及态度;卫生服务提供因素;服务对象对癌症筛查的信念和担忧以及实际问题。这些与筛查过程的不同阶段相关。服务对象住院时不会收到筛查或癌症检测试剂盒的邀请。若未在全科医生处登记,他们通常不会被常规邀请进行筛查。缺乏综合护理意味着精神卫生工作人员不知道某人是否逾期未进行检测,且在健康促进过程中往往不会考虑癌症筛查。包括信息处理问题、筛查过程使症状加重的程度、医患关系不佳以及出行困难等障碍因人而异。筛查专业人员有提供帮助的积极性,但可能缺乏时间或培训来满足精神卫生需求。有一些应对措施,但服务对象必须主动寻求帮助,而这可能对他们来说很困难。

结论

精神卫生服务对象在接受癌症筛查方面存在特定障碍,这妨碍了医疗服务的平等性。需要在个体、政策和服务提供层面采取个性化的干预措施。初级和二级护理人员以及政策制定者应共同努力,为这一人群制定综合的癌症筛查方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/33de/4942968/4c67c85186d9/12913_2016_1505_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/33de/4942968/4c67c85186d9/12913_2016_1505_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/33de/4942968/4c67c85186d9/12913_2016_1505_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Influences on uptake of cancer screening in mental health service users: a qualitative study.对精神卫生服务使用者癌症筛查接受情况的影响:一项定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Jul 12;16:257. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1505-4.
2
Cancer in English prisons: a mixed-methods study of diagnosis, treatment, care costs and patient and staff experiences.英国监狱中的癌症:一项关于诊断、治疗、护理成本以及患者和工作人员经历的混合方法研究。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Feb;13(3):1-51. doi: 10.3310/HYRT9622.
3
Conceptual framework on barriers and facilitators to implementing perinatal mental health care and treatment for women: the MATRIx evidence synthesis.关于为女性实施围产期心理健康护理和治疗的障碍与促进因素的概念框架:MATRIx证据综合分析
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 Jan;12(2):1-187. doi: 10.3310/KQFE0107.
4
Perspectives of healthcare providers, service users, and family members about mental illness stigma in primary care settings: A multi-site qualitative study of seven countries in Africa, Asia, and Europe.在初级保健环境中心理疾病污名化的医护人员、服务使用者和家属观点:一项在非洲、亚洲和欧洲七个国家的多地点定性研究。
PLoS One. 2021 Oct 27;16(10):e0258729. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0258729. eCollection 2021.
5
Development and evaluation of a de-escalation training intervention in adult acute and forensic units: the EDITION systematic review and feasibility trial.成人急症和法医病房中降级治疗培训干预措施的制定和评估:EDITION 系统评价和可行性试验。
Health Technol Assess. 2024 Jan;28(3):1-120. doi: 10.3310/FGGW6874.
6
The Resilience Hub approach for addressing mental health of health and social care workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: a mixed-methods evaluation.应对 COVID-19 大流行期间卫生和社会保健工作者心理健康问题的韧性中心方法:一项混合方法评估。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 Sep;12(29):1-164. doi: 10.3310/HGQR5133.
7
Service user involvement in mental health system strengthening in a rural African setting: qualitative study.服务使用者参与非洲农村地区精神卫生系统强化工作的质性研究
BMC Psychiatry. 2017 May 18;17(1):187. doi: 10.1186/s12888-017-1352-9.
8
Making the journey with me: a qualitative study of experiences of a bespoke mental health smoking cessation intervention for service users with serious mental illness.与我同行:一项针对患有严重精神疾病的服务使用者的定制心理健康戒烟干预措施体验的定性研究。
BMC Psychiatry. 2016 Jun 8;16:193. doi: 10.1186/s12888-016-0901-y.
9
Right care, first time: a highly personalised and measurement-based care model to manage youth mental health.精准医疗,首次就诊:高度个性化和基于评估的青少年心理健康管理医疗模式。
Med J Aust. 2019 Nov;211 Suppl 9:S3-S46. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50383.
10
Barriers and facilitators to the integration of mental health services into primary healthcare: a qualitative study among Ugandan primary care providers using the COM-B framework.将心理健康服务纳入初级卫生保健的障碍与促进因素:一项使用COM-B框架对乌干达初级保健提供者进行的定性研究
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Nov 26;18(1):890. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3684-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Development and preliminary evaluation in community mental health teams of a cervical screening informed-choice tool for women with severe mental illness in England: a mixed-method study.英格兰针对患有严重精神疾病女性的宫颈癌筛查知情选择工具在社区精神卫生团队中的开发与初步评估:一项混合方法研究
BMJ Open. 2025 Jul 8;15(7):e105777. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-105777.
2
Intervention recommendations to improve uptake of breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening among individuals living with serious mental illness.改善患有严重精神疾病个体的乳腺癌、宫颈癌和结直肠癌筛查参与度的干预建议。
Cancer Causes Control. 2024 Mar;35(3):451-463. doi: 10.1007/s10552-023-01791-y. Epub 2023 Oct 16.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Cancer screening, prevention, and treatment in people with mental illness.患有精神疾病者的癌症筛查、预防与治疗。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2016 Mar-Apr;66(2):134-51. doi: 10.3322/caac.21334. Epub 2015 Dec 10.
2
Use of a decision aid including information on overdetection to support informed choice about breast cancer screening: a randomised controlled trial.使用包含过度检测信息的决策辅助工具来支持有关乳腺癌筛查的知情选择:一项随机对照试验。
Lancet. 2015 Apr 25;385(9978):1642-52. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60123-4. Epub 2015 Feb 18.
3
Influences on individuals' decisions to take up the offer of a health check: a qualitative study.
Breast cancer screening participation in women using mental health services in NSW, Australia: a population study.
澳大利亚新南威尔士州使用心理健康服务的女性参与乳腺癌筛查:一项人群研究。
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2024 May;59(5):839-846. doi: 10.1007/s00127-023-02509-w. Epub 2023 Jun 12.
4
Screening for cervical cancer among women with behavioral health conditions-A systematic review.对患有行为健康问题的女性进行宫颈癌筛查——一项系统综述。
Prev Med Rep. 2023 May 12;34:102238. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2023.102238. eCollection 2023 Aug.
5
Inequalities in cancer screening participation between adults with and without severe mental illness: results from a cross-sectional analysis of primary care data on English Screening Programmes.癌症筛查参与度在有严重精神疾病和无严重精神疾病的成年人之间的不平等:基于英国筛查项目初级保健数据的横断面分析结果。
Br J Cancer. 2023 Jul;129(1):81-93. doi: 10.1038/s41416-023-02249-3. Epub 2023 May 4.
6
A protocol to identify the barriers and facilitators for people with severe mental illness and/or learning disabilities for PErson Centred Cancer Screening Services (PECCS).为有严重精神疾病和/或学习障碍的人确定个人为中心的癌症筛查服务(PECCS)的障碍和促进因素的方案。
PLoS One. 2022 Nov 30;17(11):e0278238. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0278238. eCollection 2022.
7
Patients' acceptability and implementation outcomes of a case management approach to encourage participation in colorectal cancer screening for people with schizophrenia: a qualitative secondary analysis of a mixed-method randomised clinical trial.患者对采用病例管理方法鼓励精神分裂症患者参与结直肠癌筛查的可接受性和实施结果:一项混合方法随机临床试验的定性二次分析。
BMJ Open. 2022 Jun 14;12(6):e060621. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-060621.
8
The Impact of Morbidity and Disability on Attendance at Organized Breast Cancer-Screening Programs: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.发病率和残疾对参加有组织的乳腺癌筛查项目的影响:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2022 Jul 1;31(7):1275-1283. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-21-1386.
9
Clinicians' perceptions of barriers to cervical cancer screening for women living with behavioral health conditions: a focus group study.临床医生对行为健康状况女性进行宫颈癌筛查障碍的看法:一项焦点小组研究。
BMC Cancer. 2022 Mar 9;22(1):252. doi: 10.1186/s12885-022-09350-5.
10
Identification of Tobacco-Related Cancer Diagnoses among Individuals with Psychiatric Disorders: A Population-Based Matched Cohort Study Using a Competing Risks Approach from British Columbia.利用不列颠哥伦比亚省的竞争风险方法进行基于人群的匹配队列研究,识别患有精神障碍个体中的烟草相关癌症诊断。
Curr Oncol. 2021 Nov 24;28(6):4953-4960. doi: 10.3390/curroncol28060415.
影响个人接受健康检查提议的因素:一项定性研究。
Health Expect. 2015 Dec;18(6):2437-48. doi: 10.1111/hex.12212. Epub 2014 Jun 3.
4
Anticipated and experienced discrimination amongst people with schizophrenia, bipolar disorder and major depressive disorder: a cross sectional study.精神分裂症、双相情感障碍和重度抑郁症患者中预期的和经历过的歧视:一项横断面研究。
BMC Psychiatry. 2014 May 29;14:157. doi: 10.1186/1471-244X-14-157.
5
Interventions to encourage uptake of cancer screening for people with severe mental illness.鼓励重度精神疾病患者接受癌症筛查的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Jul 16(7):CD009641. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009641.pub2.
6
Exploring cancer screening in the context of unmet mental health needs: a participatory pilot study.在未满足的心理健康需求背景下探索癌症筛查:一项参与性试点研究。
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2013 Summer;7(2):123-34. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2013.0027.
7
Methods to increase participation in organised screening programs: a systematic review.提高参与组织性筛查计划的方法:系统综述。
BMC Public Health. 2013 May 13;13:464. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-464.
8
Disparities in breast and cervical cancer screening in women with mental illness: a systematic literature review.精神疾病妇女的乳腺癌和宫颈癌筛查差异:系统文献回顾。
Am J Prev Med. 2013 Apr;44(4):392-398. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2012.12.006.
9
Cancer-related mortality in people with mental illness.癌症相关死亡率在精神疾病患者中。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2013 Feb;70(2):209-17. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2013.278.
10
Cervical cancer screening and acute care visits among Medicaid enrollees with mental and substance use disorders.接受医疗补助的精神和物质使用障碍患者的宫颈癌筛查和急性护理就诊情况。
Psychiatr Serv. 2012 Aug;63(8):815-22. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201100301.