Achim Virginie, Aye Ralph W, Farivar Alexander S, Vallières Eric, Louie Brian E
Thoracic and Esophageal Surgery, Swedish Cancer Institute and Medical Center, Thoracic and Foregut Surgery, 1101 Madison, Suite 900, Seattle, WA, 98104, USA.
Surg Endosc. 2017 Feb;31(2):788-794. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5033-4. Epub 2016 Jul 12.
The traditional approach to epiphrenic diverticula is thoracotomy and diverticulectomy, together with myotomy ± partial fundoplication to address underlying dysmotility. A laparoscopic approach has been advocated but access to more proximal diverticula is problematic. We propose the selective addition of a thoracoscopic approach to overcome these challenges and reviewed our results.
A retrospective review from 2004 to 2015 identified 17 patients with an epiphrenic diverticulum who underwent surgery. Patients were grouped according to height of the diverticular neck (HDN) above the GEJ: group A < 5 cm, group B > 5 cm. Preoperative evaluation and type of surgery performed were recorded. Postoperative complications, mortality, and clinical outcomes using quality of life metrics and objective testing were assessed.
The mean size of the diverticulum was 3.3 cm (2-6 cm) with a mean height above the GEJ of 5.5 cm (0-12 cm). A motility disorder was identified in 15/17. Group A, 9 patients, underwent laparoscopic diverticulectomy, myotomy, and partial fundoplication. For group B, 8 patients, the intended procedure was thoracoscopic diverticulectomy followed by laparoscopic myotomy and partial fundoplication, but this was only completed in 5. In 3 the myotomy was aborted or incomplete with subsequent staple line leaks resulting in 1 death. At a mean follow-up of 21 months, improvement of median QOLRAD scores from 3.42 to 6.2 (p = 0.18); GERD-HRQL from 23 to 1 (p = 0.05), swallowing score from 17.5 to 30 (p = 0.22), and Eckardt scores from 5 to 0 (p < 0.05) were observed.
A minimally invasive strategy for epiphrenic diverticula based HDN above the GEJ and selective thoracoscopy for higher diverticula is feasible and appropriate, and resulted in improved quality of life. Incomplete myotomy was associated with a substantially higher complication rate. Laparoscopic myotomy should precede diverticulectomy for all cases, especially for high diverticula.
治疗膈上憩室的传统方法是开胸手术和憩室切除术,同时行肌切开术±部分胃底折叠术以解决潜在的动力障碍问题。有人主张采用腹腔镜手术方法,但处理位置更高的憩室存在困难。我们建议选择性地增加胸腔镜手术方法以克服这些挑战,并回顾了我们的结果。
对2004年至2015年的病例进行回顾性分析,确定了17例行手术治疗的膈上憩室患者。根据憩室颈部(HDN)高于胃食管连接部(GEJ)的高度对患者进行分组:A组<5cm,B组>5cm。记录术前评估和所施行的手术类型。评估术后并发症、死亡率以及使用生活质量指标和客观检查得出的临床结果。
憩室的平均大小为3.3cm(2 - 6cm),高于GEJ的平均高度为5.5cm(0 - 12cm)。17例中有15例发现存在动力障碍。A组9例患者接受了腹腔镜憩室切除术、肌切开术和部分胃底折叠术。B组8例患者,计划的手术是胸腔镜憩室切除术后行腹腔镜肌切开术和部分胃底折叠术,但仅5例完成了该手术。3例患者的肌切开术中止或未完成,随后钉合线漏出导致1例死亡。平均随访21个月时,观察到中位QOLRAD评分从3.42提高到6.2(p = 0.18);GERD - HRQL评分从23降至1(p = 0.05),吞咽评分从17.5提高到30(p = 0.22),埃卡德特评分从5降至0(p <0.05)。
基于GEJ上方的HDN对膈上憩室采用微创策略以及对位置较高的憩室选择性采用胸腔镜手术是可行且合适的,并改善了生活质量。肌切开术不完全与并发症发生率显著升高相关。所有病例中,尤其是高位憩室,腹腔镜肌切开术应在憩室切除术之前进行。