Saeger Mark, Heckmann Jan, Purtskhvanidze Konstantine, Caliebe Amke, Roider Johann, Koinzer Stefan
Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital of Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, House 25, Arnold-Heller-Str. 3, 24105, Kiel, Germany.
Institute of Medical Informatics and Statistics, University Hospital of Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, House 31, Arnold-Heller-Str. 3, 24105, Kiel, Germany.
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2017 Jan;255(1):49-59. doi: 10.1007/s00417-016-3416-9. Epub 2016 Jul 12.
Photocoagulation lesion intensity relies on the judgement of retinal blanching. Lesions turn out variable due to observer-dependent judgement and time dependency of blanching. We investigated lesion variability per patient and per physician in clinical routine treatments.
In this observational clinical trial, different physicians performed panretinal photocoagulation for diabetic retinopathy. Study eyes received 20-30 study lesions at 20 ms (three physicians, nine eyes) and 200 ms (four physicians, 12 eyes) irradiation time (532 nm continuous wave photocoagulator, 300 μm spot size). Lesions were imaged after 1 hour with photography and optical coherence tomography (OCT). We measured lesion diameters in fundus and OCT images, and graded intensities according to a previously published six-step classifier.
200-ms lesions were larger and more severe (568, 474-625 μm [median, IQR], predominantly class 6) than 20-ms lesions (397, 347-459 μm, predominantly classes 3-4). The impact of laser power was small compared to other factors. Lesion intensities and diameters in fundus and OCT images varied significantly between patients and between physicians. Median photographic lesion diameters varied by up to a factor of 1.61 (20 ms) or 1.5 (200 ms) respectively.
In this study, the treated area of retina varied by up to a factor of 1.61 = 2.59 for a given spot number. As clinical efficacy depends on the treated area, which is a function of lesion number by area per lesion, our results implicate poor control of the overall treatment effect if treatments are administered according to lesion number or spacing alone. Better ways of laser effect control should be sought.
光凝病变强度依赖于视网膜变白的判断。由于观察者依赖的判断和变白的时间依赖性,病变结果存在差异。我们在临床常规治疗中研究了每位患者和每位医生的病变变异性。
在这项观察性临床试验中,不同医生对糖尿病性视网膜病变进行全视网膜光凝。研究眼在20毫秒(三名医生,九只眼)和200毫秒(四名医生,十二只眼)照射时间(532纳米连续波光凝器,光斑大小300微米)下接受20 - 30个研究病变。1小时后用摄影和光学相干断层扫描(OCT)对病变进行成像。我们在眼底和OCT图像中测量病变直径,并根据先前发表的六步分类器对强度进行分级。
200毫秒的病变比20毫秒的病变更大且更严重(568, 474 - 625微米[中位数,四分位间距],主要为6级)(397, 347 - 459微米,主要为3 - 4级)。与其他因素相比,激光功率的影响较小。眼底和OCT图像中的病变强度和直径在患者之间以及医生之间存在显著差异。摄影测量的病变直径中位数分别变化高达1.61倍(20毫秒)或1.5倍(200毫秒)。
在本研究中,对于给定的光斑数量,视网膜的治疗面积变化高达1.61倍 = 2.59倍。由于临床疗效取决于治疗面积,而治疗面积是病变数量乘以每个病变面积的函数,我们的结果表明,如果仅根据病变数量或间距进行治疗,对整体治疗效果的控制不佳。应寻求更好的激光效果控制方法。