• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

向博士生教授工程伦理学:伯克利-代尔夫特倡议:评“跨课程伦理:研究和工程伦理中更广泛(和更深入)教学和学习的前景”。

Teaching Engineering Ethics to PhD Students: A Berkeley-Delft Initiative : Commentary on "Ethics Across the Curriculum: Prospects for Broader (and Deeper) Teaching and Learning in Research and Engineering Ethics".

机构信息

Department of Philosophy, Technology, Policy and Management, Delft University of Technology, PO 5015, 2600 GA, Delft, The Netherlands.

Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, 79 John F. Kennedy Street, Cambridge, MA, 02138, USA.

出版信息

Sci Eng Ethics. 2019 Dec;25(6):1763-1770. doi: 10.1007/s11948-016-9809-7. Epub 2016 Jul 13.

DOI:10.1007/s11948-016-9809-7
PMID:27411530
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6952336/
Abstract

A joint effort by the University of California at Berkeley and Delft University of Technology to develop a graduate engineering ethics course for PhD students encountered two types of challenges: academic and institutional. Academically, long-term collaborative research efforts between engineering and philosophy faculty members might be needed before successful engineering ethics courses can be initiated; the teaching of ethics to engineering graduate students and collaborative research need to go hand-in-hand. Institutionally, both bottom-up approaches at the level of the faculty and as a joint research and teaching effort, and top-down approaches that include recognition by a University's administration and the top level of education management, are needed for successful and sustainable efforts to teach engineering ethics.

摘要

加州大学伯克利分校和代尔夫特理工大学合作开发一门博士生工程伦理课程,他们遇到了两类挑战:学术方面和制度方面的挑战。学术方面,在开设成功的工程伦理课程之前,工程学和哲学教师之间可能需要进行长期的合作研究;向工程学研究生教授伦理学以及合作研究需要齐头并进。制度方面,无论是自下而上的教师层面的方法,还是作为联合研究和教学工作的方法,还是包括大学管理层和最高教育管理层认可的自上而下的方法,对于成功和可持续地教授工程伦理学都是必要的。

相似文献

1
Teaching Engineering Ethics to PhD Students: A Berkeley-Delft Initiative : Commentary on "Ethics Across the Curriculum: Prospects for Broader (and Deeper) Teaching and Learning in Research and Engineering Ethics".向博士生教授工程伦理学:伯克利-代尔夫特倡议:评“跨课程伦理:研究和工程伦理中更广泛(和更深入)教学和学习的前景”。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2019 Dec;25(6):1763-1770. doi: 10.1007/s11948-016-9809-7. Epub 2016 Jul 13.
2
Ethics Across the Curriculum: Prospects for Broader (and Deeper) Teaching and Learning in Research and Engineering Ethics.贯穿课程的伦理道德:研究和工程伦理教学与学习的更广泛(和更深入)前景。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2019 Dec;25(6):1735-1762. doi: 10.1007/s11948-016-9797-7. Epub 2016 Aug 22.
3
Ethics and engineering courses at Delft University of Technology: contents, educational setup and experiences.代尔夫特理工大学的伦理与工程课程:内容、教育设置及经验
Sci Eng Ethics. 2001 Apr;7(2):267-82. doi: 10.1007/s11948-001-0048-0.
4
Medical ethics educational improvement, is it needed or not?! Survey for the assessment of the needed form, methods and topics of medical ethics teaching course amongst the final years medical students Faculty of Medicine Ain Shams University (ASU), Cairo, Egypt 2010.医学伦理学教育改进,是否有必要?!2010年于埃及开罗艾因夏姆斯大学医学院对医学专业最后一年学生进行的关于医学伦理学教学课程所需形式、方法和主题评估的调查。
J Forensic Leg Med. 2011 Jul;18(5):204-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jflm.2011.02.012. Epub 2011 Mar 21.
5
A systematic approach to engineering ethics education.系统的工程伦理教育方法。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2012 Jun;18(2):339-49. doi: 10.1007/s11948-010-9249-8. Epub 2010 Nov 23.
6
Quality of faculty, students, curriculum and resources for nursing doctoral education in Korea: a focus group study.韩国护理博士教育的师资、学生、课程和资源质量:一项焦点小组研究。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2010 Mar;47(3):295-306. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2009.07.005. Epub 2009 Aug 15.
7
Gaming, texting, learning? Teaching engineering ethics through students' lived experiences with technology.游戏、短信、学习?通过学生对技术的亲身体验来教授工程伦理。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2013 Sep;19(3):1375-93. doi: 10.1007/s11948-012-9368-5. Epub 2012 May 16.
8
Transforming Ethics Education Through a Faculty Learning Community: "I'm Coming Around to Seeing Ethics as Being Maybe as Important as Calculus".通过教师学习共同体转变伦理教育:“我开始认识到,伦理学也许和微积分一样重要”。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2024 Sep 9;30(5):40. doi: 10.1007/s11948-024-00503-2.
9
Student-driven courses on the social and ecological responsibilities of engineers : commentary on "student-inspired activities for the teaching and learning of engineering ethics".学生主导的工程师社会责任与生态责任课程:评“以学生为中心的工程伦理教学活动”
Sci Eng Ethics. 2013 Dec;19(4):1469-72. doi: 10.1007/s11948-013-9490-z. Epub 2013 Nov 1.
10
Introduction of interdisciplinary teaching: two case studies : commentary on "teaching science, technology, and society to engineering students: a sixteen year journey".跨学科教学介绍:两个案例研究——对“向工科学生教授科学、技术与社会:十六年的历程”的评论。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2013 Dec;19(4):1451-4. doi: 10.1007/s11948-013-9475-y. Epub 2013 Oct 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Towards a Psychologically Realist, Culturally Responsive Approach to Engineering Ethics in Global Contexts.迈向全球背景下工程伦理的心理现实主义、文化响应式方法。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2025 Apr 1;31(2):10. doi: 10.1007/s11948-025-00536-1.
2
Pedagogical Orientations and Evolving Responsibilities of Technological Universities: A Literature Review of the History of Engineering Education.技术大学的教学方向和不断演变的责任:工程教育历史的文献回顾。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2023 Dec 5;29(6):40. doi: 10.1007/s11948-023-00460-2.
3
A Multi-level Review of Engineering Ethics Education: Towards a Socio-technical Orientation of Engineering Education for Ethics.工程伦理教育的多层次审视:迈向工程伦理教育的社会技术取向。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2021 Aug 24;27(5):60. doi: 10.1007/s11948-021-00333-6.
4
The Importance of Ethics in Modern Universities of Technology.伦理道德在现代科技大学中的重要性。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2019 Dec;25(6):1625-1632. doi: 10.1007/s11948-019-00164-6. Epub 2019 Dec 24.
5
The Survival Imperative : Commentary on "Whither the University? Universities of Technology and the Problem of Institutional Purpose".生存的必要性:评“大学何去何从?技术大学与制度目的问题”。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2019 Dec;25(6):1699-1704. doi: 10.1007/s11948-019-00159-3. Epub 2019 Dec 12.

本文引用的文献

1
Ethics Across the Curriculum: Prospects for Broader (and Deeper) Teaching and Learning in Research and Engineering Ethics.贯穿课程的伦理道德:研究和工程伦理教学与学习的更广泛(和更深入)前景。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2019 Dec;25(6):1735-1762. doi: 10.1007/s11948-016-9797-7. Epub 2016 Aug 22.
2
Just a Cog in the Machine? The Individual Responsibility of Researchers in Nanotechnology is a Duty to Collectivize.仅仅是机器上的一个齿轮?纳米技术中研究人员的个人责任是实现集体化的义务。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2016 Jun;22(3):871-87. doi: 10.1007/s11948-015-9718-1. Epub 2015 Nov 4.
3
Science for sale: improve ethics education.待售的科学:加强伦理教育。
Science. 2014 Jan 10;343(6167):137. doi: 10.1126/science.343.6167.137-c.
4
Editors' overview perspectives on teaching social responsibility to students in science and engineering.编辑视角下的理工科学生社会责任教育教学
Sci Eng Ethics. 2013 Dec;19(4):1413-38. doi: 10.1007/s11948-013-9495-7. Epub 2013 Nov 26.
5
Taking emotion seriously: meeting students where they are.认真对待情感:在学生所在之处与他们相遇。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2014 Mar;20(1):183-95. doi: 10.1007/s11948-012-9427-y. Epub 2013 Jan 11.
6
Teaching ethics and technology with Agora, an electronic tool.使用电子工具“ agora”教授伦理与技术。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2005 Apr;11(2):277-97. doi: 10.1007/s11948-005-0046-8.
7
Ethics and engineering courses at Delft University of Technology: contents, educational setup and experiences.代尔夫特理工大学的伦理与工程课程:内容、教育设置及经验
Sci Eng Ethics. 2001 Apr;7(2):267-82. doi: 10.1007/s11948-001-0048-0.