Huang Kaibin, Wang Ziyue, Gu Yong, Hu Yafang, Ji Zhong, Wang Shengnan, Lin Zhenzhou, Li Xing, Xie Zuoshan, Pan Suyue
Department of Neurology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Department of Neurology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
J Am Heart Assoc. 2016 Jul 13;5(7):e003465. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.116.003465.
We previously have shown that glibenclamide (GBC), a sulfonylurea receptor 1-transient receptor potential M4 (SUR1-TRPM4) channel inhibitor, improves survival and neurological outcome after asphyxial cardiac arrest and cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ACA/CPR). Here, we further compare the efficacy of GBC with target temperature management (TTM) and determine whether the efficacy of GBC is affected by TTM.
Male Sprague-Dawley rats (n=213) subjected to 10-minute ACA/CPR were randomized to 4 groups after return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC): normothermia control (NT); GBC; TTM; and TTM+GBC. Survival, neurodeficit scores, histological injury, as well as the expressions of SUR1 and TRPM4 were evaluated. The 7-day survival rate was 34.4% (11 of 32) in the NT group, 65% (13 of 20) in the GBC group, 50% (10 of 20) in the TTM group, and 70% (14 of 20) in the TTM+GBC group. Rats that received either GBC, TTM alone, or in combination showed less neurological deficit than NT control at 24, 48, and 72 hours and 7 days after ROSC. Moreover, TTM or GBC ameliorated neuronal degeneration and glial activation in the hippocampal CA1 region with similar efficacy, whereas the combination of them had a trend toward better effect. The subunits of SUR1-TRPM4 heterodimers were both strongly upregulated after ACA/CPR and expressed in multiple types of brain cells, but partly suppressed by TTM.
GBC is comparable to TTM in improving survival and neurological outcome after ACA/CPR. When GBC is given along with TTM, less histological injury tended to be achieved.
我们之前已经表明,格列本脲(GBC),一种磺酰脲受体1 - 瞬时受体电位M4(SUR1 - TRPM4)通道抑制剂,可改善窒息性心脏骤停和心肺复苏(ACA/CPR)后的生存率和神经功能结局。在此,我们进一步比较GBC与目标温度管理(TTM)的疗效,并确定GBC的疗效是否受TTM影响。
将经历10分钟ACA/CPR的雄性Sprague - Dawley大鼠(n = 213)在自主循环恢复(ROSC)后随机分为4组:常温对照组(NT);GBC组;TTM组;以及TTM + GBC组。评估生存率、神经功能缺损评分、组织学损伤以及SUR1和TRPM4的表达。NT组的7天生存率为34.4%(32只中的11只),GBC组为65%(20只中的13只),TTM组为50%(20只中的10只),TTM + GBC组为70%(20只中的14只)。单独接受GBC、TTM或两者联合治疗的大鼠在ROSC后24、48和72小时以及7天时的神经功能缺损均比NT对照组少。此外,TTM或GBC改善海马CA1区神经元变性和胶质细胞活化的疗效相似,而两者联合使用有效果更好的趋势。ACA/CPR后SUR1 - TRPM4异二聚体的亚基均强烈上调,并在多种类型的脑细胞中表达,但部分被TTM抑制。
在改善ACA/CPR后的生存率和神经功能结局方面,GBC与TTM相当。当GBC与TTM联合使用时,倾向于实现更少的组织学损伤。