Moore Brian C J
a Department of Experimental Psychology , University of Cambridge , Cambridge , UK.
Int J Audiol. 2016 Dec;55(12):707-714. doi: 10.1080/14992027.2016.1204565. Epub 2016 Jul 14.
Hearing loss caused by exposure to intense sounds usually has its greatest effects on audiometric thresholds at 4 and 6 kHz. However, in several countries compensation for occupational noise-induced hearing loss is calculated using the average of audiometric thresholds for selected frequencies up to 3 kHz, based on the implicit assumption that hearing loss for frequencies above 3 kHz has no material adverse consequences. This paper assesses whether this assumption is correct.
Studies are reviewed that evaluate the role of hearing for frequencies above 3 kHz.
Several studies show that frequencies above 3 kHz are important for the perception of speech, especially when background sounds are present. Hearing at high frequencies is also important for sound localization, especially for resolving front-back confusions.
Hearing for frequencies above 3 kHz is important for the ability to understand speech in background sounds and for the ability to localize sounds. The audiometric threshold at 4 kHz and perhaps 6 kHz should be taken into account when assessing hearing in a medico-legal context.
暴露于高强度声音导致的听力损失通常对4千赫和6千赫的听力阈值影响最大。然而,在一些国家,职业性噪声性听力损失的赔偿是根据高达3千赫的选定频率的听力阈值平均值来计算的,这基于一个隐含的假设,即高于3千赫频率的听力损失没有实质性的不良后果。本文评估这一假设是否正确。
对评估高于3千赫频率听力作用的研究进行综述。
多项研究表明,高于3千赫的频率对言语感知很重要,尤其是在存在背景声音时。高频听力对声音定位也很重要,特别是对于解决前后混淆。
高于3千赫频率的听力对于在背景声音中理解言语的能力和声音定位能力很重要。在法医背景下评估听力时,应考虑4千赫甚至6千赫的听力阈值。