Sauerland Melanie, Raymaekers Linsey H C, Otgaar Henry, Memon Amina, Waltjen Thijs T, Nivo Maud, Slegers Chiel, Broers Nick J, Smeets Tom
Department of Clinical Psychological Science, Maastricht University, the Netherlands.
City University London, UK.
Behav Sci Law. 2016 Jul;34(4):580-94. doi: 10.1002/bsl.2249. Epub 2016 Jul 15.
In the eyewitness identification literature, stress and arousal at the time of encoding are considered to adversely influence identification performance. This assumption is in contrast with findings from the neurobiology field of learning and memory, showing that stress and stress hormones are critically involved in forming enduring memories. This discrepancy may be related to methodological differences between the two fields of research, such as the tendency for immediate testing or the use of very short (1-2 hours) retention intervals in eyewitness research, while neurobiology studies insert at least 24 hours. Other differences refer to the extent to which stress-responsive systems (i.e., the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis) are stimulated effectively under laboratory conditions. The aim of the current study was to conduct an experiment that accounts for the contemporary state of knowledge in both fields. In all, 123 participants witnessed a live staged theft while being exposed to a laboratory stressor that reliably elicits autonomic and glucocorticoid stress responses or while performing a control task. Salivary cortisol levels were measured to control for the effectiveness of the stress induction. One week later, participants attempted to identify the thief from target-present and target-absent line-ups. According to regression and receiver operating characteristic analyses, stress did not have robust detrimental effects on identification performance. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. © 2016 The Authors Behavioral Sciences & the Law Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
在目击证人辨认文献中,编码时的压力和唤醒被认为会对辨认表现产生不利影响。这一假设与学习和记忆神经生物学领域的研究结果相反,该领域研究表明压力和应激激素在形成持久记忆中起着关键作用。这种差异可能与两个研究领域的方法学差异有关,比如目击证人研究中倾向于即时测试或使用非常短(1 - 2小时)的保持间隔,而神经生物学研究至少插入24小时。其他差异涉及在实验室条件下应激反应系统(即下丘脑 - 垂体 - 肾上腺轴)被有效刺激的程度。本研究的目的是进行一项考虑到两个领域当前知识状态的实验。总共123名参与者目睹了一场现场 staged 盗窃,同时他们要么暴露于能可靠引发自主神经和糖皮质激素应激反应的实验室应激源下,要么执行一项对照任务。测量唾液皮质醇水平以控制应激诱导的有效性。一周后,参与者尝试从有目标和无目标的列队中辨认小偷。根据回归分析和接受者操作特征分析,压力对辨认表现没有显著的不利影响。版权所有© 2016约翰·威利父子有限公司。© 2016作者 行为科学与法律 由约翰·威利父子有限公司出版