Suppr超能文献

慢性丙型肝炎治疗的依从性:从含干扰素方案到不含干扰素和利巴韦林方案

Adherence to treatment of chronic hepatitis C: from interferon containing regimens to interferon and ribavirin free regimens.

作者信息

Younossi Zobair M, Stepanova Maria, Henry Linda, Nader Fatema, Younossi Youssef, Hunt Sharon

机构信息

Center for Liver Diseases, Department of Medicine, Inova Fairfax Hospital, Falls Church, VA, USA Center for Outcomes Research in Liver Diseases, Washington, DC Betty and Guy Beatty Center for Integrated Research, Inova Health System, Falls Church, VA, USA.

出版信息

Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Jul;95(28):e4151. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000004151.

Abstract

Patients' experience during treatment may affect treatment adherence. Our aim was to assess the impact of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) on adherence to different anti-hepatitis C virus (HCV) regimens.Clinical, demographic, and PRO data (short form-36 [SF-36], chronic liver disease questionnaire-hepatitis C version [CLDQ-HCV], functional assessment of chronic illness therapy-fatigue [FACIT-F], work productivity and activity impairment: specific health problem [WPAI:SHP]) from 13 multinational clinical trials of anti-HCV treatment were available. Treatment adherence was defined as >80% of prescribed doses taken.Included were 4825 HCV patients. Regimens were grouped into: interferon- and ribavirin (RBV)-containing (±sofosbuvir [SOF]), interferon-free RBV-containing (RBV + SOF ± ledipasvir [LDV]), and interferon-free RBV-free (LDV/SOF). The adherence to these regimens were 77.6%, 84.3%, and 96.2%, respectively (P < 0.0001). Nonadherent patients were more likely to be unemployed and to have a greater PRO impairment at baseline (up to -5.3% lower PRO scores, P < 0.0001). During treatment with interferon- or RBV-based regimens, nonadherent patients experienced lower PROs and had larger decrements from their baseline PRO scores. In contrast, there were no significant declines in PRO scores (all P > 0.05) for the small number of patients who were nonadherent to LDV/SOF. In multivariate analysis, being treatment-naive, longer treatment duration, and receiving an interferon- or RBV-containing regimen were associated with a lower likelihood of adherence (all P < 0.003). Better baseline and on-treatment PRO scores were associated with a higher likelihood of adherence to interferon and RBV.The use of interferon and/or RBV, longer duration of treatment, and lower baseline and on-treatment PRO scores were linked to a decreased likelihood of being adherent to interferon + RBV-containing or interferon-free RBV-containing antiviral regimens. Interferon- and RBV-free regimens were associated with excellent adherence.

摘要

患者在治疗期间的体验可能会影响治疗依从性。我们的目的是评估患者报告结局(PROs)对不同抗丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)治疗方案依从性的影响。可获取来自13项抗HCV治疗的多国临床试验的临床、人口统计学和PRO数据(简短健康调查问卷-36 [SF-36]、慢性肝病问卷-丙型肝炎版本[CLDQ-HCV]、慢性病治疗功能评估-疲劳[FACIT-F]、工作生产力和活动障碍:特定健康问题[WPAI:SHP])。治疗依从性定义为服用规定剂量的>80%。纳入了4825例HCV患者。治疗方案分为:含干扰素和利巴韦林(RBV)的(±索磷布韦[SOF])、不含干扰素含RBV的(RBV + SOF ± 来迪派韦[LDV])以及不含干扰素不含RBV的(LDV/SOF)。这些方案的依从性分别为77.6%、84.3%和96.2%(P < 0.0001)。不依从的患者更可能失业,且在基线时PRO损害更大(PRO评分低至 -5.3%,P < 0.0001)。在用基于干扰素或RBV的方案治疗期间,不依从的患者PRO较低,且与基线PRO评分相比下降幅度更大。相比之下,对于少数不依从LDV/SOF的患者,PRO评分无显著下降(所有P > 0.05)。在多变量分析中,初治、治疗时间较长以及接受含干扰素或RBV的方案与较低的依从可能性相关(所有P < 0.003)。更好的基线和治疗期间PRO评分与更高的干扰素和RBV依从可能性相关。使用干扰素和/或RBV、治疗时间较长以及较低的基线和治疗期间PRO评分与含干扰素 + RBV或不含干扰素含RBV的抗病毒方案的依从可能性降低有关。不含干扰素和RBV的方案与极佳的依从性相关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/74fa/4956799/1be9acfd402c/medi-95-e4151-g004.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验