Turner Hugo C, Truscott James E, Bettis Alison A, Hollingsworth T Déirdre, Brooker Simon J, Anderson Roy M
London Centre for Neglected Tropical Disease Research, Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, St Mary's Campus, Imperial College London, Norfolk Place, London W2 1PG, UK; Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, St Mary's Campus, Imperial College London, Norfolk Place, London W2 1PG, UK.
Mathematics Institute, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, UK; School of Life Sciences, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, UK.
Parasite Epidemiol Control. 2016 Jun;1(2):177-187. doi: 10.1016/j.parepi.2016.02.004.
Soil-transmitted helminth (STH) infections are predominately controlled by providing children with preventive chemotherapy with either albendazole or mebendazole. However, neither has a high efficacy against . This low efficacy limits the overall effectiveness of the current STH control programmes against . It has been demonstrated that co-administering ivermectin with albendazole or mebendazole significantly increases the efficacy of current treatments, which may increase the overall effectiveness of control programmes.
Using a STH transmission mathematical model, we evaluated the potential impact of co-administering ivermectin with albendazole or mebendazole to treat within a preventive chemotherapy programme targeting children (2-15 year olds). We evaluated the impact in terms of reduction in prevalent infections, mean worm burden, and prevalence of heavy infections.
Although the current treatment strategy reduced worm burden and prevalence of heavy infections, due to their poor efficacy the long term impact of preventive chemotherapy for children was smaller compared to the other STH. Co-administering ivermectin increased the projected impact of the preventive chemotherapy programme in terms of all three of the explored metrics, practically in high transmission settings. Furthermore, ivermectin co-administration greatly increased the feasibility of and timeframe for breaking transmission.
Co-administering ivermectin notably increased the projected impact of preventive chemotherapy in high transmission settings and increased the feasibility for breaking transmission. This has important implications for control programmes, some of which may be shifting focus from morbidity control to interruption of transmission, and some of which may be logistically unable to provide preventive chemotherapy twice a year as recommended. However, the benefit of co-administering ivermectin is limited by the fact that 2-5 year olds are often ineligible to receive treatment.
土壤传播的蠕虫(STH)感染主要通过为儿童提供阿苯达唑或甲苯达唑预防性化疗来控制。然而,两者对[某种寄生虫,原文此处缺失具体信息]的疗效都不高。这种低疗效限制了当前STH控制项目对[该寄生虫]的整体效果。已证明,将伊维菌素与阿苯达唑或甲苯达唑联合使用可显著提高当前治疗的疗效,这可能会提高控制项目的整体效果。
我们使用一个STH传播数学模型,评估在针对儿童(2至15岁)的预防性化疗项目中,将伊维菌素与阿苯达唑或甲苯达唑联合使用治疗[该寄生虫]的潜在影响。我们从减少流行感染、平均蠕虫负荷和重度感染患病率方面评估了这种影响。
尽管当前的治疗策略降低了[该寄生虫]的蠕虫负荷和重度感染患病率,但由于其疗效不佳,与其他STH相比,儿童预防性化疗的长期影响较小。联合使用伊维菌素在所有三个探索指标方面都增加了预防性化疗项目的预期影响,在高传播环境中实际效果更明显。此外,联合使用伊维菌素大大增加了阻断传播的可行性和时间范围。
联合使用伊维菌素显著增加了高传播环境中预防性化疗的预期影响,并增加了阻断传播的可行性。这对控制项目具有重要意义,其中一些项目可能正从发病率控制转向传播阻断,而一些项目在后勤方面可能无法按建议每年提供两次预防性化疗。然而,联合使用伊维菌素的益处受到2至5岁儿童通常无资格接受治疗这一事实的限制。