• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

受试者工作特征曲线下面积的小幅改善表明预测风险的微小变化。

Small improvement in the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve indicated small changes in predicted risks.

机构信息

Department of Clinical Genetics/EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, Section Community Genetics, VU University Medical Center, PO Box 7057 (BS7 A-529), 1007 MB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Department of Clinical Genetics/EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, Section Community Genetics, VU University Medical Center, PO Box 7057 (BS7 A-529), 1007 MB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Epidemiology, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, 1518 Clifton Road NE, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Epidemiol. 2016 Nov;79:159-164. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.07.002. Epub 2016 Jul 16.

DOI:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.07.002
PMID:27430730
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Adding risk factors to a prediction model often increases the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) only slightly, particularly when the AUC of the model was already high. We investigated whether a risk factor that minimally improves the AUC may nevertheless improve the predictive ability of the model, assessed by integrated discrimination improvement (IDI).

STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING

We simulated data sets with risk factors and event status for 100,000 hypothetical individuals and created prediction models with AUCs between 0.50 and 0.95. We added a single risk factor for which the effect was modeled as a certain odds ratio (OR 2, 4, 8) or AUC increment (ΔAUC 0.01, 0.02, 0.03).

RESULTS

Across all AUC values of the baseline model, for a risk factor with the same OR, both ΔAUC and IDI were lower when the AUC of the baseline model was higher. When the increment in AUC was small (ΔAUC 0.01), the IDI was also small, except when the AUC of the baseline model was >0.90.

CONCLUSION

When the addition of a risk factor shows minimal improvement in AUC, predicted risks generally show minimal changes too. Updating risk models with strong risk factors may be informative for a subgroup of individuals, but not at the population level. The AUC may not be as insensitive as is frequently argued.

摘要

目的

在预测模型中添加风险因素通常只会略微提高受试者工作特征曲线(AUC)下的面积,尤其是当模型的 AUC 已经很高时。我们研究了风险因素是否可以最小程度地提高 AUC,但可以通过综合判别改善(IDI)来提高模型的预测能力。

研究设计和设置

我们模拟了具有风险因素和事件状态的 100,000 个假想个体的数据,并为 AUC 在 0.50 到 0.95 之间的预测模型创建了数据。我们添加了一个单一的风险因素,该因素的影响被建模为特定的比值比(OR2、4、8)或 AUC 增量(ΔAUC0.01、0.02、0.03)。

结果

在基线模型的所有 AUC 值中,对于具有相同 OR 的风险因素,当基线模型的 AUC 较高时,ΔAUC 和 IDI 均较低。当 AUC 增量较小时(ΔAUC0.01),IDI 也较小,除非基线模型的 AUC>0.90。

结论

当添加风险因素对 AUC 的改善很小,预测风险通常也会发生很小的变化。对于具有强风险因素的风险模型进行更新可能对个体的亚组有意义,但对人群水平没有意义。AUC 可能不像经常讨论的那样不敏感。

相似文献

1
Small improvement in the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve indicated small changes in predicted risks.受试者工作特征曲线下面积的小幅改善表明预测风险的微小变化。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2016 Nov;79:159-164. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.07.002. Epub 2016 Jul 16.
2
Improvement of risk prediction by genomic profiling: reclassification measures versus the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve.基因组分析可改善风险预测:重新分类测量与接收者操作特征曲线下面积。
Am J Epidemiol. 2010 Aug 1;172(3):353-61. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwq122. Epub 2010 Jun 18.
3
Simpson's paradox in the integrated discrimination improvement.综合鉴别改善中的辛普森悖论。
Stat Med. 2017 Dec 10;36(28):4468-4481. doi: 10.1002/sim.6862. Epub 2016 Jan 5.
4
Evaluation of polygenic risk models using multiple performance measures: a critical assessment of discordant results.使用多种性能指标评估多基因风险模型:对不一致结果的批判性评估。
Genet Med. 2019 Feb;21(2):391-397. doi: 10.1038/s41436-018-0058-9. Epub 2018 Jun 12.
5
Evaluating the effect of multiple genetic risk score models on colorectal cancer risk prediction.评估多个遗传风险评分模型对结直肠癌风险预测的影响。
Gene. 2018 Oct 5;673:174-180. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2018.06.035. Epub 2018 Jun 14.
6
Simple Decision-Analytic Functions of the AUC for Ruling Out a Risk Prediction Model and an Added Predictor.用于排除风险预测模型和附加预测因子的 AUC 的简单决策分析函数。
Med Decis Making. 2018 Feb;38(2):225-234. doi: 10.1177/0272989X17732994. Epub 2017 Oct 12.
7
Immunological and cardiometabolic risk factors in the prediction of type 2 diabetes and coronary events: MONICA/KORA Augsburg case-cohort study.免疫和心血管代谢危险因素与 2 型糖尿病和冠心病事件的预测:MONICA/KORA 奥格斯堡病例-队列研究。
PLoS One. 2011;6(6):e19852. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0019852. Epub 2011 Jun 6.
8
Incremental value of rare genetic variants for the prediction of multifactorial diseases.罕见遗传变异对多因素疾病预测的增量价值。
Genome Med. 2013 Aug 20;5(8):76. doi: 10.1186/gm480. eCollection 2013.
9
Asymptotic distribution of ∆AUC, NRIs, and IDI based on theory of U-statistics.基于U统计量理论的ΔAUC、NRI和IDI的渐近分布。
Stat Med. 2017 Sep 20;36(21):3334-3360. doi: 10.1002/sim.7333. Epub 2017 Jun 19.
10
Constructing Hypothetical Risk Data from the Area under the ROC Curve: Modelling Distributions of Polygenic Risk.从ROC曲线下面积构建假设风险数据:多基因风险分布建模
PLoS One. 2016 Mar 29;11(3):e0152359. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0152359. eCollection 2016.

引用本文的文献

1
Order of Occurrence of COVID-19 Symptoms.新冠病毒感染症状出现的顺序。
Qual Manag Health Care. 2023;32(Suppl 1):S29-S34. doi: 10.1097/QMH.0000000000000397.
2
A New Insight Into Missing Data in Intensive Care Unit Patient Profiles: Observational Study.重症监护病房患者资料中缺失数据的新见解:观察性研究。
JMIR Med Inform. 2019 Jan 8;7(1):e11605. doi: 10.2196/11605.
3
Effect of Hospital Readmission Reduction on Patients at Low, Medium, and High Risk of Readmission in the Medicare Population.降低医院再入院率对医疗保险人群中低、中、高再入院风险患者的影响。
J Hosp Med. 2018 Aug 1;13(8):537-543. doi: 10.12788/jhm.2936. Epub 2018 Feb 12.
4
Reconsidering lactate as a sepsis risk biomarker.重新审视乳酸作为脓毒症风险生物标志物的作用。
PLoS One. 2017 Oct 3;12(10):e0185320. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0185320. eCollection 2017.