• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

从ROC曲线下面积构建假设风险数据:多基因风险分布建模

Constructing Hypothetical Risk Data from the Area under the ROC Curve: Modelling Distributions of Polygenic Risk.

作者信息

Kundu Suman, Kers Jannigje G, Janssens A Cecile J W

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.

Department of Epidemiology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2016 Mar 29;11(3):e0152359. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0152359. eCollection 2016.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0152359
PMID:27023073
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4811433/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Modeling studies using hypothetical polygenic risk data can be an efficient tool for investigating the effectiveness of downstream applications such as targeting interventions to risk groups to justify whether empirical investigation is warranted. We investigated the assumptions underlying a method that simulates risk data for specific values of the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC).

METHODS

The simulation method constructs risk data for a hypothetical population based on the population disease risk, and the odds ratios and frequencies of genetic variants. By systematically varying the parameters, we investigated under what conditions AUC values represent unique ROC curves with unique risk distributions for patients and nonpatients, and to what extend risk data can be simulated for precise values of the AUC.

RESULTS

Using larger number of genetic variants each with a modest effect, we observed that the distributions of estimated risks of patients and nonpatients were similar for various combinations of the odds ratios and frequencies of the risk alleles. Simulated ROC curves overlapped empirical curves with the same AUC.

CONCLUSIONS

Polygenic risk data can be effectively and efficiently created using a simulation method. This allows to further investigate the potential applications of stratifying interventions on the basis of polygenic risk.

摘要

背景

使用假设的多基因风险数据进行建模研究可能是一种有效的工具,用于调查下游应用的有效性,例如针对风险群体进行干预,以证明是否有必要进行实证研究。我们研究了一种为特定的受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC)值模拟风险数据的方法所依据的假设。

方法

该模拟方法基于人群疾病风险、遗传变异的比值比和频率,为一个假设人群构建风险数据。通过系统地改变参数,我们研究了在何种条件下AUC值代表具有患者和非患者独特风险分布的独特ROC曲线,以及可以在多大程度上为AUC的精确值模拟风险数据。

结果

使用大量每个效应适度的遗传变异,我们观察到对于风险等位基因的比值比和频率的各种组合,患者和非患者的估计风险分布相似。模拟的ROC曲线与具有相同AUC的实证曲线重叠。

结论

可以使用模拟方法有效且高效地创建多基因风险数据。这使得能够进一步研究基于多基因风险进行分层干预的潜在应用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ae1/4811433/5f9c1d9708e4/pone.0152359.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ae1/4811433/c39fa3a3d13d/pone.0152359.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ae1/4811433/25da604133b3/pone.0152359.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ae1/4811433/23d77951c2a9/pone.0152359.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ae1/4811433/5f9c1d9708e4/pone.0152359.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ae1/4811433/c39fa3a3d13d/pone.0152359.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ae1/4811433/25da604133b3/pone.0152359.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ae1/4811433/23d77951c2a9/pone.0152359.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ae1/4811433/5f9c1d9708e4/pone.0152359.g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Constructing Hypothetical Risk Data from the Area under the ROC Curve: Modelling Distributions of Polygenic Risk.从ROC曲线下面积构建假设风险数据:多基因风险分布建模
PLoS One. 2016 Mar 29;11(3):e0152359. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0152359. eCollection 2016.
2
Analytical and simulation methods for estimating the potential predictive ability of genetic profiling: a comparison of methods and results.用于评估基因分析潜在预测能力的分析和模拟方法:方法比较与结果。
Eur J Hum Genet. 2012 Dec;20(12):1270-4. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2012.89. Epub 2012 May 30.
3
Evaluation of polygenic risk models using multiple performance measures: a critical assessment of discordant results.使用多种性能指标评估多基因风险模型:对不一致结果的批判性评估。
Genet Med. 2019 Feb;21(2):391-397. doi: 10.1038/s41436-018-0058-9. Epub 2018 Jun 12.
4
A new parametric method based on S-distributions for computing receiver operating characteristic curves for continuous diagnostic tests.一种基于S分布的用于连续诊断测试计算受试者工作特征曲线的新参数方法。
Stat Med. 2002 May 15;21(9):1213-35. doi: 10.1002/sim.1086.
5
Small improvement in the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve indicated small changes in predicted risks.受试者工作特征曲线下面积的小幅改善表明预测风险的微小变化。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2016 Nov;79:159-164. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.07.002. Epub 2016 Jul 16.
6
Estimating the Area Under ROC Curve When the Fitted Binormal Curves Demonstrate Improper Shape.当拟合的双正态曲线呈现不合适的形状时估计ROC曲线下的面积。
Acad Radiol. 2017 Feb;24(2):209-219. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2016.09.020. Epub 2016 Nov 21.
7
Value of genetic profiling for the prediction of coronary heart disease.基因谱分析在预测冠心病方面的价值。
Am Heart J. 2009 Jul;158(1):105-10. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2009.04.022.
8
Polygenic score prediction captures nearly all common genetic risk for Alzheimer's disease.多基因评分预测几乎涵盖了阿尔茨海默病所有常见的遗传风险。
Neurobiol Aging. 2017 Jan;49:214.e7-214.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2016.07.018. Epub 2016 Aug 5.
9
Improving polygenic risk prediction from summary statistics by an empirical Bayes approach.基于经验贝叶斯方法改善基于汇总统计量的多基因风险预测。
Sci Rep. 2017 Feb 1;7:41262. doi: 10.1038/srep41262.
10
The average receiver operating characteristic curve in multireader multicase imaging studies.多阅片者多病例影像研究中的平均受试者工作特征曲线。
Br J Radiol. 2014 Aug;87(1040):20140016. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20140016. Epub 2014 Jun 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Multi-center Integrating Radiomics, Structured Reports, and Machine Learning Algorithms for Assisted Classification of COVID-19 in Lung Computed Tomography.多中心整合影像组学、结构化报告和机器学习算法用于肺部计算机断层扫描中新型冠状病毒肺炎的辅助分类
J Med Biol Eng. 2023;43(2):156-162. doi: 10.1007/s40846-023-00781-4. Epub 2023 Mar 7.
2
Cost-effectiveness of using artificial intelligence versus polygenic risk score to guide breast cancer screening.使用人工智能与多基因风险评分指导乳腺癌筛查的成本效益比较。
BMC Cancer. 2022 May 6;22(1):501. doi: 10.1186/s12885-022-09613-1.
3
Comparison of the Finnish Diabetes Risk Score Model With the Metabolic Syndrome in a Shanghai Population.

本文引用的文献

1
Prediction of breast cancer risk based on profiling with common genetic variants.基于常见基因变异谱预测乳腺癌风险。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2015 Apr 8;107(5). doi: 10.1093/jnci/djv036. Print 2015 May.
2
Implications of polygenic risk-stratified screening for prostate cancer on overdiagnosis.多基因风险分层筛查前列腺癌对过度诊断的影响。
Genet Med. 2015 Oct;17(10):789-95. doi: 10.1038/gim.2014.192. Epub 2015 Jan 8.
3
Combined associations of genetic and environmental risk factors: implications for prevention of breast cancer.
芬兰糖尿病风险评分模型与上海人群代谢综合征的比较。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2022 Feb 22;13:725314. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2022.725314. eCollection 2022.
4
Cost-Effectiveness of Risk-Stratified Colorectal Cancer Screening Based on Polygenic Risk: Current Status and Future Potential.基于多基因风险的风险分层结直肠癌筛查的成本效益:现状与未来潜力
JNCI Cancer Spectr. 2019 Oct 14;4(1):pkz086. doi: 10.1093/jncics/pkz086. eCollection 2020 Feb.
遗传和环境风险因素的联合关联:对乳腺癌预防的启示
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014 Nov 12;106(11). doi: 10.1093/jnci/dju305. Print 2014 Nov.
4
Metabolic factors accelerate colorectal adenoma recurrence.代谢因素会加速结肠直肠腺瘤复发。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2014 Oct 23;14:187. doi: 10.1186/1471-230X-14-187.
5
Relationship between resistant hypertension and arterial stiffness assessed by brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity in the older patient.老年患者中通过臂踝脉搏波速度评估的难治性高血压与动脉僵硬度之间的关系。
Clin Interv Aging. 2014 Sep 5;9:1495-502. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S68544. eCollection 2014.
6
Estimating the predictive ability of genetic risk models in simulated data based on published results from genome-wide association studies.基于全基因组关联研究发表的结果,估计遗传风险模型在模拟数据中的预测能力。
Front Genet. 2014 Jun 13;5:179. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2014.00179. eCollection 2014.
7
Personalized screening for cancers: should we consider polygenic profiling?癌症的个性化筛查:我们应该考虑多基因分析吗?
Per Med. 2013 Aug 1;10(6):511-513. doi: 10.2217/pme.13.46.
8
Variations in predicted risks in personal genome testing for common complex diseases.常见复杂疾病个体基因组检测预测风险的差异。
Genet Med. 2014 Jan;16(1):85-91. doi: 10.1038/gim.2013.80. Epub 2013 Jun 27.
9
Public health implications from COGS and potential for risk stratification and screening.从 COGS 角度看公共卫生影响,以及风险分层和筛查的可能性。
Nat Genet. 2013 Apr;45(4):349-51. doi: 10.1038/ng.2582.
10
Incorporating genomics into breast and prostate cancer screening: assessing the implications.将基因组学纳入乳腺癌和前列腺癌筛查:评估其影响。
Genet Med. 2013 Jun;15(6):423-32. doi: 10.1038/gim.2012.167. Epub 2013 Feb 14.