Wang Xiaoling, Qian Mingyi, Yu Hongyu, Sun Yang, Li Songwei, Yang Peng, Lin Muyu, Yao Nishao, Zhang Xilin
Institute of Applied Psychology, Tianjin University, China; Department of Psychology and Beijing Key Laboratory of Behavior and Mental Health, Peking University, China.
Department of Psychology, Peking University, China
Psychol Rep. 2016 Oct;119(2):539-56. doi: 10.1177/0033294116658605. Epub 2016 Jul 18.
This study examined how positive-scale assessment of ambiguous social stimuli affects interpretation bias in social anxiety. Participants with high and low social anxiety (N = 60) performed a facial expression discrimination task to assess interpretation bias. Participants were then randomly assigned to assess the emotion of briefly presented faces either on a negative or on a positive scale. They subsequently repeated the facial expression discrimination task. Participants with high versus low social anxiety made more negative interpretations of ambiguous facial expressions. However, those in the positive-scale assessment condition subsequently showed reduced negative interpretations of ambiguous facial expressions. These results suggest that interpretation bias in social anxiety could be mediated by positive priming rather than an outright negative bias.
本研究考察了对模糊社会刺激的积极量表评估如何影响社交焦虑中的解释偏差。高社交焦虑和低社交焦虑的参与者(N = 60)进行了面部表情辨别任务以评估解释偏差。然后,参与者被随机分配以消极或积极量表来评估短暂呈现面孔的情绪。随后,他们重复面部表情辨别任务。高社交焦虑与低社交焦虑的参与者对模糊面部表情做出了更多消极解释。然而,处于积极量表评估条件下的参与者随后对模糊面部表情的消极解释有所减少。这些结果表明,社交焦虑中的解释偏差可能是由积极启动介导的,而非单纯的消极偏差。
Psychol Rep. 2016-10
J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2016-9
Psychiatry Res. 2016-4-28
Psychiatry Res. 2018-2-20
Psychiatry Res. 2016-7-9
J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2018-6