• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

单机构开展根治性顺行模块化胰脾切除术的初步经验。

Initial experience with radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy in a single institution.

作者信息

Kim Eun Young, You Young Kyoung, Kim Dong Goo, Hong Tae Ho

机构信息

Department of Hepato-biliary and Pancreas Surgery, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Ann Surg Treat Res. 2016 Jul;91(1):29-36. doi: 10.4174/astr.2016.91.1.29. Epub 2016 Jun 30.

DOI:10.4174/astr.2016.91.1.29
PMID:27433462
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4942536/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy (RAMPS) is expected to be favorable for obtaining the negative tangential margin with oncologic feasibility through the horizontal dissection in a right-to-left fashion for radical lymph node dissections.

METHODS

From January 2007 to February 2015, a total of 30 RAMPS and 19 conventional distal pancreatectomy (DP) cases were enrolled. The demographics, perioperative and survival outcomes were compared according to the type of surgery.

RESULTS

The mean operative time, blood loss and length of hospital stay were similar between 2 groups. Morbidities were reported in 14 cases of RAMPS (46.7%) and 8 cases of DP (42.1%) (P = 0.777). The rate of negative tangential margin (96.2%) and the number of harvested lymph nodes (mean ± standard deviation, 21.5 ± 8.3) were significantly higher in RAMPS group (P = 0.011, P = 0.003, respectively). In terms of survival outcomes, there was no significant difference in regard to the overall 3-year disease-free survival (DFS; 30.4% in RAMPS vs. 35.0% in DP, P = 0.354) or overall survival (OS; 29.9% vs. 29.4%, P = 0.429) between the 2 groups. After exclusion of cases with nodal invasion, however, the RAMPS group had a longer DFS than the DP group (55.6% vs. 27.3%, P = 0.048) although OS was similar without significant difference (42.4% vs. 27.3%, P = 0.197).

CONCLUSION

RAMPS is a safe and oncologically feasible procedure in left-sided pancreatic cancer by obtaining a successful negative tangential margin and radical lymph node dissection. The authors suggest it could also be useful for local control, especially for the limited left-sided pancreatic cancer without nodal invasion.

摘要

目的

根治性顺行模块化胰脾切除术(RAMPS)有望通过从右向左水平解剖进行根治性淋巴结清扫,在肿瘤学可行性方面有利于获得阴性切缘。

方法

2007年1月至2015年2月,共纳入30例RAMPS病例和19例传统远端胰腺切除术(DP)病例。根据手术类型比较人口统计学、围手术期和生存结果。

结果

两组的平均手术时间、失血量和住院时间相似。RAMPS组有14例(46.7%)出现并发症,DP组有8例(42.1%)出现并发症(P = 0.777)。RAMPS组的阴性切缘率(96.2%)和清扫淋巴结数量(平均值±标准差,21.5±8.3)显著更高(分别为P = 0.011,P = 0.003)。在生存结果方面,两组的3年总体无病生存率(DFS;RAMPS组为30.4%,DP组为35.0%,P = 0.354)或总体生存率(OS;29.9%对29.4%,P = 0.429)无显著差异。然而,排除有淋巴结转移的病例后,RAMPS组的DFS长于DP组(55.6%对27.3%,P = 0.048),尽管OS相似且无显著差异(42.4%对27.3%,P = 0.197)。

结论

RAMPS是一种安全且在肿瘤学上可行的手术方法,可成功获得阴性切缘并进行根治性淋巴结清扫,适用于左侧胰腺癌。作者认为它对局部控制也可能有用,特别是对于没有淋巴结转移的局限性左侧胰腺癌。

相似文献

1
Initial experience with radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy in a single institution.单机构开展根治性顺行模块化胰脾切除术的初步经验。
Ann Surg Treat Res. 2016 Jul;91(1):29-36. doi: 10.4174/astr.2016.91.1.29. Epub 2016 Jun 30.
2
Laparoscopic radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy for left-sided pancreatic cancer using the ligament of Treitz approach.经屈氏韧带入路腹腔镜根治性顺行模块化胰脾切除术治疗左侧胰腺癌。
Surg Endosc. 2017 Nov;31(11):4836-4837. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5561-6. Epub 2017 Apr 13.
3
Initial experience with laparoscopic radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy for left-sided pancreatic cancer in a single institution: technical aspects and oncological outcomes.单机构开展腹腔镜根治性顺行模块化胰脾切除术治疗左侧胰腺癌的初步经验:技术要点与肿瘤学结局
BMC Surg. 2017 Jan 7;17(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s12893-016-0200-z.
4
Radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy (RAMPS) versus conventional distal pancreatectomy for left-sided pancreatic cancer: findings of a multicenter, retrospective, propensity score matching study.根治性顺行模块化胰脾切除术(RAMPS)与传统胰体尾切除术治疗左侧胰腺癌的比较:一项多中心回顾性倾向评分匹配研究的结果。
Surg Today. 2021 Nov;51(11):1775-1786. doi: 10.1007/s00595-021-02280-y. Epub 2021 Apr 8.
5
Comparison of minimal invasive versus open radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy (RAMPS) for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a single center retrospective study.微创与开放根治性顺行模块化胰脾切除术(RAMPS)治疗胰腺导管腺癌的比较:一项单中心回顾性研究
Surg Endosc. 2021 Jul;35(7):3763-3773. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-07938-1. Epub 2020 Oct 8.
6
Radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy (RAMPS) versus conventional distal pancreatosplenectomy (CDPS) for left-sided pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.根治性顺行模块化胰脾切除术(RAMPS)与传统胰体尾切除术(CDPS)治疗左侧胰导管腺癌的比较。
Surg Today. 2021 Jul;51(7):1126-1134. doi: 10.1007/s00595-020-02203-3. Epub 2021 Jan 3.
7
Comparison of Surgical Outcomes Between Radical Antegrade Modular Pancreatosplenectomy (RAMPS) and Standard Retrograde Pancreatosplenectomy (SPRS) for Left-Sided Pancreatic Cancer.根治性顺行模块化胰脾切除术(RAMPS)与标准逆行胰脾切除术(SPRS)治疗左侧胰腺癌的手术结果比较
World J Surg. 2016 Sep;40(9):2267-75. doi: 10.1007/s00268-016-3526-x.
8
Role and Efficacy of Robotic-assisted Radical Antegrade Modular Pancreatosplenectomy (RAMPS) in Left-sided Pancreatic Cancer.机器人辅助顺行模块化胰脾切除术(RAMPS)在左侧胰腺癌中的作用及疗效
Cancer Diagn Progn. 2022 Mar 3;2(2):144-149. doi: 10.21873/cdp.10088. eCollection 2022 Mar-Apr.
9
Assessement of postoperative long-term survival quality and complications associated with radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy and distal pancreatectomy: a meta-analysis and systematic review.顺行性模块化胰脾切除术和远端胰腺切除术相关的术后长期生存质量及并发症评估:一项荟萃分析和系统评价
BMC Surg. 2019 Jan 28;19(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s12893-019-0476-x.
10
Left kidney mobilization technique during radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy (RAMPS).根治性顺行模块化胰脾切除术(RAMPS)中左肾的游离技术。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2019 Mar;404(2):247-252. doi: 10.1007/s00423-019-01767-0. Epub 2019 Feb 27.

引用本文的文献

1
A LASSO Cox Regression Predictive Model for Patients Undergoing Surgery for Pancreatic Body and Tail Adenocarcinoma Patients: Comparative Long-Term Survival Analysis of Radical Antegrade Modular Pancreatosplenectomy (RAMPS) and Standard Retrograde Pancreatosplenectomy (SPRS).用于接受胰体尾腺癌手术患者的 LASSO Cox 回归预测模型:根治性顺行模块化胰脾切除术 (RAMPS) 和标准逆行胰脾切除术 (SPRS) 的比较长期生存分析。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2024 Nov;31(12):8317-8326. doi: 10.1245/s10434-024-15939-w. Epub 2024 Aug 7.
2
Comparison of Survival Outcomes between Radical Antegrade Modular Pancreatosplenectomy and Conventional Distal Pancreatosplenectomy for Pancreatic Body and Tail Cancer: Korean Multicenter Propensity Score Match Analysis.根治性顺行模块化胰脾切除术与传统远端胰脾切除术治疗胰体尾癌的生存结果比较:韩国多中心倾向评分匹配分析
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Apr 18;16(8):1546. doi: 10.3390/cancers16081546.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Left-sided pancreatic cancer: distal pancreatectomy and its variants: radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy and distal pancreatectomy with celiac axis resection.左侧胰腺癌:胰体尾切除术及其变体:根治性顺行模块化胰脾切除术和伴有腹腔动脉切除的胰体尾切除术。
Cancer J. 2012 Nov-Dec;18(6):562-70. doi: 10.1097/PPO.0b013e31827596c5.
2
Surgical outcome of pancreatic cancer using radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy procedure.采用根治性顺行模块化胰脾切除术治疗胰腺癌的手术效果。
World J Gastroenterol. 2012 Oct 21;18(39):5595-600. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i39.5595.
3
Symptomatic change and gastrointestinal quality of life after pancreatectomy.
Complications in Distal Pancreatectomy versus Radical Antegrade Modular Pancreatosplenectomy: A Disease Risk Score Analysis Utilizing National Surgical Quality Improvement Project Data.远端胰腺切除术与根治性顺行模块化胰脾切除术的并发症:利用国家手术质量改进计划数据的疾病风险评分分析。
World J Surg. 2022 Jul;46(7):1768-1775. doi: 10.1007/s00268-022-06545-6. Epub 2022 Apr 11.
4
Korean Surgical Practice Guideline for Pancreatic Cancer 2022: A summary of evidence-based surgical approaches.《2022年韩国胰腺癌手术实践指南:基于证据的手术方法总结》
Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2022 Feb 28;26(1):1-16. doi: 10.14701/ahbps.22-009.
5
The efficacy of radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.根治性顺行模块化胰脾切除术的疗效:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2022 Nov;29(11):1156-1165. doi: 10.1002/jhbp.1120. Epub 2022 Feb 15.
6
Clinical Outcome of RAMPS for Left-Sided Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: A Comparison of Anterior RAMPS versus Posterior RAMPS for Patients without Periadrenal Infiltration.保留幽门胰十二指肠切除术治疗左侧胰腺导管腺癌的临床结果:无肾上腺周围浸润患者的前入路保留幽门胰十二指肠切除术与后入路保留幽门胰十二指肠切除术的比较
Biomedicines. 2021 Sep 22;9(10):1291. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines9101291.
7
ISOlation Procedure vs. conventional procedure during Distal Pancreatectomy (ISOP-DP trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.ISOlation Procedure vs. conventional procedure during Distal Pancreatectomy (ISOP-DP trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
Trials. 2021 Sep 16;22(1):633. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05523-y.
8
Comparison of Radical Antegrade Modular Pancreatosplenectomy with Standard Retrograde Pancreatosplenectomy for Left-Sided Pancreatic Cancer: A Meta-Analysis and Experience of a Single Center.左半侧胰腺癌行根治性顺行模块化胰脾切除术与标准逆行胰脾切除术的比较:一项荟萃分析及单中心经验。
Med Sci Monit. 2019 Jun 21;25:4590-4601. doi: 10.12659/MSM.914540.
9
Radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy versus standard procedure in the treatment of left-sided pancreatic cancer: A systemic review and meta-analysis.根治性顺行模块化胰脾切除术与标准手术治疗左侧胰腺癌的系统评价和荟萃分析
BMC Surg. 2017 Jun 5;17(1):67. doi: 10.1186/s12893-017-0259-1.
胰腺切除术后症状变化与胃肠道生活质量
HPB (Oxford). 2012 Jan;14(1):9-13. doi: 10.1111/j.1477-2574.2011.00396.x. Epub 2011 Oct 25.
4
Postoperative bowel function and nutritional status following distal pancreatectomy with en-bloc celiac axis resection.远端胰腺切除术联合整块腹腔动脉切除术后的肠功能和营养状况。
Dig Surg. 2010 Aug;27(3):212-6. doi: 10.1159/000265573. Epub 2010 Jun 22.
5
Radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy procedure for adenocarcinoma of the body and tail of the pancreas: ability to obtain negative tangential margins.根治性顺行模块化胰脾切除术治疗胰腺体尾部腺癌:获得切缘阴性的能力
J Am Coll Surg. 2007 Feb;204(2):244-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2006.11.002. Epub 2007 Jan 4.
6
Assessment of complications after pancreatic surgery: A novel grading system applied to 633 patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy.胰腺手术后并发症的评估:一种应用于633例行胰十二指肠切除术患者的新型分级系统。
Ann Surg. 2006 Dec;244(6):931-7; discussion 937-9. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000246856.03918.9a.
7
Gastrointestinal function and quality of life after pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy.保留幽门的胰十二指肠切除术后的胃肠功能与生活质量
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2006;13(3):218-24. doi: 10.1007/s00534-005-1067-z.
8
Distal pancreatectomy for resectable adenocarcinoma of the body and tail of the pancreas.胰体尾可切除腺癌的远端胰腺切除术
J Gastrointest Surg. 2005 Sep-Oct;9(7):922-7. doi: 10.1016/j.gassur.2005.04.008.
9
Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition.术后胰瘘:国际研究小组(ISGPF)定义
Surgery. 2005 Jul;138(1):8-13. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2005.05.001.
10
Is extended resection for adenocarcinoma of the body or tail of the pancreas justified?胰腺体尾部腺癌的扩大切除术是否合理?
J Gastrointest Surg. 2003 Dec;7(8):946-52; discussion 952. doi: 10.1016/j.gassur.2003.08.004.