Suppr超能文献

更广泛的影响:关于美国黑猩猩研究政策决策的国际影响及综合伦理考量

Broader impacts: international implications and integrative ethical consideration of policy decisions about US chimpanzee research.

作者信息

Bennett Allyson J, Panicker Sangeeta

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin.

Science Directorate, American Psychological Association, Washington, District of Columbia.

出版信息

Am J Primatol. 2016 Dec;78(12):1282-1303. doi: 10.1002/ajp.22582. Epub 2016 Jul 19.

Abstract

Recent decisions and unprecedented evaluative processes about research with chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) by the US National Institutes of Health (NIH) continue to attract widespread attention by the public, media, and scientific community. Over the past 5 years, actions by the NIH and the United States Fish and Wildlife Services, have significantly truncated valuable scientific research and jeopardized future research. From a global perspective, the decisions have broad consequences for research aimed not only at human health, but also the conservation and welfare of other species. Full consideration of the role that research plays in improving animal welfare in captivity and in the wild, and the impact of the loss of access to chimpanzees for research, remains largely unexamined. At the same time, legal initiatives aimed at protecting chimpanzees by granting them "personhood" status have increasingly raised questions about equity in standards, oversight, and transparency for chimpanzees in other captive settings. Together, the decisions, subsequent actions, and public discussion put the growing need for a more integrative and global approach to decision-making about the future of captive chimpanzees into sharp relief. In this paper, we outline an expansive framework for ethical consideration to guide dialogue and decisions about animal research, welfare, and equitable treatment of nonhuman animals across settings. Regardless of the setting in which animals live, science plays an indispensable role in informing decisions about individual, species, societal, and environmental health. Thus, the scientific community and broader public need to engage in serious and thoughtful deliberations to weigh the harms and benefits of conducting (or failing to conduct) research that transcends geographic borders and that can guide responsible and informed decisions about the future of chimpanzees.

摘要

美国国立卫生研究院(NIH)最近关于黑猩猩(Pan troglodytes)研究的决定以及前所未有的评估过程,持续吸引着公众、媒体和科学界的广泛关注。在过去5年里,NIH和美国鱼类及野生动物管理局采取的行动,严重缩减了有价值的科学研究,并危及未来的研究。从全球角度来看,这些决定不仅对旨在促进人类健康的研究,而且对其他物种的保护和福利研究都产生了广泛影响。对于研究在改善圈养和野外动物福利方面所起的作用,以及失去用于研究的黑猩猩所带来的影响,仍未得到充分考量。与此同时,旨在通过赋予黑猩猩“人格”地位来保护它们的法律举措,越来越多地引发了关于其他圈养环境中黑猩猩在标准、监督和透明度方面的公平性问题。这些决定、后续行动以及公众讨论共同凸显了,对于圈养黑猩猩的未来决策,日益需要一种更综合、全球化的方法。在本文中,我们概述了一个广泛的伦理考量框架,以指导关于动物研究、福利以及跨环境中对非人类动物公平对待的对话和决策。无论动物生活在何种环境中,科学在为有关个体、物种、社会和环境健康的决策提供信息方面都发挥着不可或缺的作用。因此,科学界和广大公众需要进行严肃且深入的思考,权衡开展(或不开展)跨越地理边界的研究的利弊,这些研究能够为有关黑猩猩未来的负责任且明智的决策提供指导。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验