Barnett Whitney, Brittain Kirsty, Sorsdahl Katherine, Zar Heather J, Stein Dan J
Department of Paediatrics and Child Health, Red Cross War Memorial Children's Hospital, and Medical Research Council Unit on Child & Adolescent Health, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Alan J. Flisher Centre for Public Mental Health, Department of Psychiatry, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Philos Ethics Humanit Med. 2016 Jul 19;11(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s13010-016-0036-2.
Critical to conducting high quality research is the ability to attract and retain participants, especially for longitudinal studies. Understanding participant experiences and motivators or barriers to participating in clinical research is crucial. There are limited data on healthy participant experiences in longitudinal research, particularly in low- and middle-income countries. This study aims to investigate quantitatively participant experiences in a South African birth cohort study.
Maternal participant experience was evaluated by a self-administered survey in the Drakenstein Child Health Study, a longitudinal birth cohort study investigating the early life determinants of child health. Pregnant mothers, enrolled during the second trimester, were followed through childbirth and the early childhood years. Satisfaction scores were derived from the participant experience survey and quantitatively analyzed; associations between satisfaction scores and sociodemographic variables were then investigated using a linear regression model.
Data were included from 585 pregnant mothers (median age 26.6 years), who had participated in the study for a median time of 16 months. Overall participant satisfaction was high (median score 51/60) and associated with increased attendance of study visits. Reasons for participating were a belief that involvement would improve their health, their child's health or the health of family and friends. Potential reasons for leaving the study were inconvenience, not receiving clinical or study results, and unexpected changes in study visits or procedures. Variables associated with higher overall satisfaction scores were no prior participation in research, higher socioeconomic status, less intensive follow-up schedules and having experienced stressful life events in the past year.
Satisfaction scores were high and associated with increased visit attendance. Participants' perceived benefits of study participation, most notably the potential for an improvement in the health of their child, were a significant motivator to enroll and remain in the study. The consistent theme of perceived health benefits as a motivator to join and remain in the study raises the question of whether participation in research results in actual improvements in health.
开展高质量研究的关键在于吸引和留住参与者的能力,尤其是对于纵向研究而言。了解参与者的经历以及参与临床研究的动机或障碍至关重要。关于纵向研究中健康参与者经历的数据有限,特别是在低收入和中等收入国家。本研究旨在对南非一项出生队列研究中的参与者经历进行定量调查。
在德拉肯斯堡儿童健康研究中,通过自我管理的调查问卷对母亲参与者的经历进行评估,该研究是一项纵向出生队列研究,旨在调查儿童健康的早期生活决定因素。孕中期登记入组的孕妇在分娩及幼儿期接受随访。满意度得分来自参与者经历调查问卷并进行定量分析;然后使用线性回归模型研究满意度得分与社会人口统计学变量之间的关联。
纳入了585名孕妇(中位年龄26.6岁)的数据,她们参与研究的中位时间为16个月。总体参与者满意度较高(中位得分51/60),且与研究访视的出勤率增加相关。参与的原因是相信参与会改善自身健康、孩子的健康或家人及朋友的健康。退出研究的潜在原因是不便、未收到临床或研究结果,以及研究访视或程序的意外变化。与总体满意度得分较高相关的变量包括此前未参与过研究、社会经济地位较高、随访时间表不那么密集以及在过去一年经历过压力大的生活事件。
满意度得分较高且与访视出勤率增加相关。参与者认为参与研究的益处,最显著的是对孩子健康改善的可能性,是参与并留在研究中的重要动机。将感知到的健康益处作为参与并留在研究中的动机这一一致主题,引发了关于参与研究是否会实际改善健康的问题。