Riley-Gibson Edward, Hall Alix, Shoesmith Adam, Wolfenden Luke, Shelton Rachel C, Pascoe William, Peden Belinda, Doherty Emma, Pollock Emma, Booth Debbie, Salloum Ramzi G, Laur Celia, Powell Byron J, Kingsland Melanie, Lane Cassandra, Hailemariam Maji, Sutherland Rachel, Nathan Nicole
School of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, Newcastle, University Drive, Callaghan, 2308 New South Wales, Australia.
The National Centre of Implementation Science (NCOIS), The University of Newcastle, University Drive, Callaghan, 2308 Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia.
Transl Behav Med. 2025 Jan 16;15(1). doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibae070.
This review assessed the effect of strategies designed to sustain the delivery of evidenced based interventions (EBIs) which target behavioural risk factors linked to leading causes of chronic disease in clinical and community settings. Seven electronic databases were searched for randomised controlled studies published from earliest record to November 2022. Studies were included if they tested a strategy to sustain the delivery of an EBI within clinical or community settings. Results were synthesised using vote counting based on direction of effect, and reported in accordance with non-meta-analytic review standards following the Synthesis Without Meta-analysis (SWiM) guidelines. Three studies met the study inclusion criteria. Two studies were community-based, with one conducted in Australian community sports clubs and the second in afterschool clubs in the United States. The single clinical-based study was conducted in community health care centres in the United States. Across the three studies, 25 strategies were employed and only two strategies were common across all studies. Synthesis using vote counting based on direction of effect indicated that two of three studies favoured the intervention as positively impacting sustainment of EBIs. Few studies have been conducted to assess the effect of strategies designed to support sustainment of EBIs for chronic disease prevention in clinical and community settings. As such, it is difficult to determine the effect of strategies designed to support sustainment. Further research with comprehensive reporting of the selection, use and testing of sustainment strategies is needed to advance understanding of how to sustain EBIs in clinical and community settings.
本综述评估了旨在维持循证干预措施(EBIs)实施的策略的效果,这些干预措施针对临床和社区环境中与慢性病主要病因相关的行为风险因素。检索了七个电子数据库,以查找从最早记录到2022年11月发表的随机对照研究。如果研究测试了在临床或社区环境中维持EBIs实施的策略,则纳入研究。根据效果方向,采用投票计数法综合结果,并按照非荟萃分析综述标准,遵循非荟萃分析合成(SWiM)指南进行报告。三项研究符合研究纳入标准。两项研究基于社区,一项在澳大利亚社区体育俱乐部进行,另一项在美国课后俱乐部进行。唯一一项基于临床的研究在美国社区医疗中心进行。在这三项研究中,共采用了25种策略,所有研究中只有两种策略是相同的。根据效果方向采用投票计数法进行的综合分析表明,三项研究中有两项认为干预措施对EBIs的维持有积极影响。很少有研究评估旨在支持在临床和社区环境中维持EBIs以预防慢性病的策略的效果。因此,很难确定旨在支持维持的策略的效果。需要进一步开展研究,全面报告维持策略的选择、使用和测试情况,以增进对如何在临床和社区环境中维持EBIs的理解。