Yang Yaewon, Im Seock-Ah, Keam Bhumsuk, Lee Kyung-Hun, Kim Tae-Yong, Suh Koung Jin, Ryu Han Suk, Moon Hyeong-Gon, Han Sae-Won, Oh Do-Youn, Han Wonshik, Kim Tae-You, Park In Ae, Noh Dong-Young
Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 110-744, Korea.
Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.
BMC Cancer. 2016 Jul 21;16:515. doi: 10.1186/s12885-016-2500-1.
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is a standard treatment for stage II/III breast cancer patients, and response to NAC is a useful prognostic marker. Since its introduction, 6-8 cycles of NAC has become the standard regimen to improve the outcome of these patients. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the prognostic impact of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) response criteria and this tool's usefulness in four different breast cancer subtypes.
We conducted a retrospective cohort study of clinical stage II/III breast cancer patients who received NAC of more than 6 cycles. Response after NAC and the clinicopathological factors were reviewed. AJCC response criteria for NAC were adopted from the AJCC Manual, 7th edition: complete response (CR), partial response (PR), and no response (NR).
A total of 183 patients were enrolled; 22 (12.0 %), 123 (67.2 %), and 38 (20.8 %) patients showed CR, PR, and NR, respectively. The AJCC response was significantly associated with relapse-free survival (RFS) (P < 0.001), whereas pathologic CR (pCR), the current gold standard for response evaluation for NAC, was not (P = 0.140). AJCC response was a significant prognostic factor for RFS in all four breast cancer subtypes, namely luminal A (P = 0.006), luminal B (P = 0.001), HER-2 enriched (P = 0.039), and triple-negative breast cancer (P = 0.035).
The AJCC response criteria represent a simple and easily reproducible tool for response evaluation of NAC patients and a useful clinical prognostic marker for RFS. These criteria also have a prognostic impact in all four breast cancer subtypes, including luminal A in which pCR has a limited role.
新辅助化疗(NAC)是II/III期乳腺癌患者的标准治疗方法,对NAC的反应是一种有用的预后标志物。自引入以来,6 - 8周期的NAC已成为改善这些患者预后的标准方案。本研究的目的是评估美国癌症联合委员会(AJCC)反应标准的预后影响以及该工具在四种不同乳腺癌亚型中的实用性。
我们对接受超过6周期NAC的临床II/III期乳腺癌患者进行了一项回顾性队列研究。回顾了NAC后的反应和临床病理因素。NAC的AJCC反应标准采用AJCC手册第7版:完全缓解(CR)、部分缓解(PR)和无反应(NR)。
共纳入183例患者;分别有22例(12.0%)、123例(67.2%)和38例(20.8%)患者表现为CR、PR和NR。AJCC反应与无复发生存期(RFS)显著相关(P < 0.001),而病理完全缓解(pCR),即目前NAC反应评估的金标准,则无显著相关性(P = 0.140)。AJCC反应是所有四种乳腺癌亚型RFS的显著预后因素,即luminal A(P = 0.006)、luminal B(P = 0.001)、HER-2富集型(P = 0.039)和三阴性乳腺癌(P = 0.035)。
AJCC反应标准是一种用于评估NAC患者反应的简单且易于重复的工具,也是RFS的一种有用的临床预后标志物。这些标准在所有四种乳腺癌亚型中也具有预后影响,包括pCR作用有限的luminal A亚型。