• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

住院医师参与对机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术结果的影响。

Impact of Resident Involvement on Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy Outcomes.

作者信息

Schommer Eric, Tonkovich Kolbi, Li Zhuo, Thiel David D

机构信息

1 Department of Urology, Mayo Clinic Florida , Jacksonville, Florida.

2 Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic , Jacksonville, Florida.

出版信息

J Endourol. 2016 Oct;30(10):1126-1131. doi: 10.1089/end.2016.0388. Epub 2016 Aug 15.

DOI:10.1089/end.2016.0388
PMID:27445128
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study examines perioperative outcomes of resident involvement during various steps of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP).

METHODS

The RARP procedure was divided into seven steps: bladder takedown (BTD), endopelvic fascia, bladder neck (BN), seminal vesicle/vas deferens, pedicle/nerve sparing, apex, and anastomosis. Three hundred seventy-two RARPs performed by a single surgeon were analyzed. Resident console time during each of the seven steps was recorded. Perioperative variables were compared to surgeon-only cases.

RESULTS

Residents performed on the console for 232 of 372 cases (62.4%). Estimated blood loss (p = 0.09), transfusion (p = 0.11), and complications (p = 0.33) were no different between surgeon-only and resident-involved cases. Mean operating room time (ORT) was less for the surgeon-only cases (190.4 vs 206.4 minutes, p = 0.003). There was no difference in positive margins (p = 0.79), length of stay (LOS) (p = 0.30), catheter days (p = 0.17), readmission (p = 0.33), or reoperation (p = 0.73) when comparing surgeon-only to resident-involved cases. Residents performing the BN step had no effect on BN margins (p = 0.73) or prolonged catheterization (p = 0.62). ORT was significantly prolonged if BTD was performed by a resident (233.0 vs 191.7 minutes, p < 0.0001). Residents performing anastomosis had no effect on prolonged catheter time (p = 0.62) or LOS (p = 0.20). Residents were more likely to be involved in at least one portion of RARP following the purchase of a Mimic simulator (Mimic Technologies, Inc., Seattle, WA) in January 2012.

CONCLUSIONS

Supervised resident console involvement in RARP does not affect perioperative outcomes, although, it prolongs ORT, with the BTD step having the most effect on ORT.

摘要

目的

本研究探讨住院医师参与机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术(RARP)各个步骤的围手术期结果。

方法

RARP手术分为七个步骤:膀胱分离(BTD)、盆腔内筋膜、膀胱颈(BN)、精囊/输精管、蒂/神经保留、尖部和吻合。分析了由一名外科医生进行的372例RARP手术。记录住院医师在七个步骤中各自的控制台操作时间。将围手术期变量与仅由外科医生操作的病例进行比较。

结果

在372例病例中,住院医师在控制台操作了232例(62.4%)。仅由外科医生操作的病例与有住院医师参与的病例在估计失血量(p = 0.09)、输血情况(p = 0.11)和并发症(p = 0.33)方面无差异。仅由外科医生操作的病例平均手术室时间(ORT)较短(190.4分钟对206.4分钟,p = 0.003)。比较仅由外科医生操作的病例与有住院医师参与的病例时,切缘阳性情况(p = 0.79)、住院时间(LOS)(p = 0.30)、导尿管留置天数(p = 0.17)、再次入院情况(p = 0.33)或再次手术情况(p = 0.73)均无差异。进行BN步骤的住院医师对BN切缘(p = 0.73)或导尿管留置时间延长(p = 0.62)无影响。如果由住院医师进行BTD,ORT会显著延长(233.0分钟对191.7分钟,p < 0.0001)。进行吻合步骤的住院医师对导尿管留置时间延长(p = 0.62)或LOS(p = 0.20)无影响。在2012年1月购买了Mimic模拟器(Mimic Technologies公司,华盛顿州西雅图)后,住院医师更有可能参与RARP的至少一部分操作。

结论

尽管住院医师在监督下参与RARP控制台操作会延长ORT,且BTD步骤对ORT影响最大,但并不影响围手术期结果。

相似文献

1
Impact of Resident Involvement on Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy Outcomes.住院医师参与对机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术结果的影响。
J Endourol. 2016 Oct;30(10):1126-1131. doi: 10.1089/end.2016.0388. Epub 2016 Aug 15.
2
Efficacy of educational stepwise robot-assisted radical prostatectomy procedure for urology residents.教育阶梯式机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术对泌尿外科住院医师的疗效。
Asian J Endosc Surg. 2024 Jul;17(3):e13334. doi: 10.1111/ases.13334.
3
Is the learning curve of the urology resident for conventional radical prostatectomy similar to that of staff initiating robot-assisted radical prostatectomy?对于传统根治性前列腺切除术,泌尿科住院医师的学习曲线是否与开始机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术的医生相似?
Int Braz J Urol. 2024 May-Jun;50(3):335-345. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2024.9909.
4
Patterns-of-care and health economic analysis of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in the Australian public health system.澳大利亚公共卫生系统中机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术的护理模式与健康经济分析。
BJU Int. 2016 Jun;117(6):930-9. doi: 10.1111/bju.13317. Epub 2015 Oct 1.
5
Superior quality of life and improved surgical margins are achievable with robotic radical prostatectomy after a long learning curve: a prospective single-surgeon study of 1552 consecutive cases.通过长期的学习曲线,机器人根治性前列腺切除术可以实现更高的生活质量和更好的手术切缘:一项连续 1552 例的单外科医生前瞻性研究。
Eur Urol. 2014 Mar;65(3):521-31. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.10.030. Epub 2013 Oct 31.
6
Perioperative outcomes of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy compared with open radical prostatectomy: results from the nationwide inpatient sample.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术与开放性根治性前列腺切除术的围手术期结局比较:来自全国住院患者样本的结果。
Eur Urol. 2012 Apr;61(4):679-85. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2011.12.027. Epub 2011 Dec 22.
7
Effect of prostate gland weight on the surgical and oncological outcomes of extraperitoneal robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.前列腺重量对腹膜外机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术的手术及肿瘤学结局的影响。
BMC Urol. 2019 Jan 3;19(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s12894-018-0434-4.
8
Safety of selective nerve sparing in high risk prostate cancer during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术中高危前列腺癌保留神经的安全性
J Robot Surg. 2017 Jun;11(2):129-138. doi: 10.1007/s11701-016-0627-3. Epub 2016 Jul 19.
9
Robotic surgical education: a systematic approach to training urology residents to perform robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.机器人手术教育:一种培训泌尿外科住院医师进行机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术的系统方法。
Urology. 2006 Jul;68(1):75-9. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2006.01.057.
10
Transition from resident robotic training program to clinical practice: robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy benchmark for perioperative safety.
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2013 Jun;23(6):516-20. doi: 10.1089/lap.2012.0503. Epub 2013 Mar 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Is the learning curve of the urology resident for conventional radical prostatectomy similar to that of staff initiating robot-assisted radical prostatectomy?对于传统根治性前列腺切除术,泌尿科住院医师的学习曲线是否与开始机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术的医生相似?
Int Braz J Urol. 2024 May-Jun;50(3):335-345. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2024.9909.
2
A systematic review and meta-analysis of unplanned hospital visits and re-admissions following radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer.前列腺癌根治性前列腺切除术后非计划性医院就诊和再入院情况的系统评价与荟萃分析。
Can Urol Assoc J. 2021 Oct;15(10):E531-E544. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.6931.
3
Infection following penile prosthesis placement at an academic training center remains low despite involvement of surgeons-in-training.
尽管有受训外科医生的参与,学术培训中心在行阴茎假体植入术后的感染率仍保持较低水平。
Investig Clin Urol. 2018 Sep;59(5):342-347. doi: 10.4111/icu.2018.59.5.342. Epub 2018 Jul 25.