Frederick Donald E, Brown Austin, Brim Elizabeth, Mehta Nisarg, Vujovic Mark, Kay Leslie M
Department of Psychology, Institute for Mind and Biology, and.
The College, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637.
J Neurosci. 2016 Jul 20;36(29):7750-67. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0569-16.2016.
Olfactory system beta (15-35 Hz) and gamma (40-110 Hz) oscillations of the local field potential in mammals have both been linked to odor learning and discrimination. Gamma oscillations represent the activity of a local network within the olfactory bulb, and beta oscillations represent engagement of a systemwide network. Here, we test whether beta and gamma oscillations represent different cognitive modes using the different demands of go/no-go and two-alternative choice tasks that previously were suggested to favor beta or gamma oscillations, respectively. We reconcile previous studies and show that both beta and gamma oscillations occur in both tasks, with gamma dominating the early odor sampling period (2-4 sniffs) and beta dominating later. The relative power and coherence of both oscillations depend separately on multiple factors within both tasks without categorical differences across tasks. While the early/gamma-associated period occurs in all trials, rats can perform above chance without the later/beta-associated period. Longer sampling, which includes beta oscillations, is associated with better performance. Gamma followed by beta oscillations therefore represents a sequence of cognitive and neural states during odor discrimination, which can be separately modified depending on the demands of a task and odor discrimination. Additionally, fast (85 Hz) and slow (70 Hz) olfactory bulb gamma oscillation sub-bands have been hypothesized to represent tufted and mitral cell networks, respectively (Manabe and Mori, 2013). We find that fast gamma favors the early and slow gamma the later (beta-dominated) odor-sampling period and that the relative contributions of these oscillations are consistent across tasks.
Olfactory system gamma (40-110 Hz) and beta (15-35 Hz) oscillations of the local field potential indicate different neural firing statistics and functional circuits. We show that gamma and beta oscillations occur in stereotyped sequence during odor sampling in associative tasks, with local gamma dominating the first 250 ms of odor sniffing, followed by systemwide beta as behavioral responses are prepared. Oscillations and coupling strength between brain regions are modulated by task, odor, and learning, showing that task features can dramatically adjust the dynamics of a cortical sensory system, which changes state every ∼250 ms. Understanding cortical circuits, even at the biophysical level, depends on careful use of multiple behavioral contexts and stimuli.
哺乳动物局部场电位的嗅觉系统β(15 - 35赫兹)和γ(40 - 110赫兹)振荡均与气味学习和辨别有关。γ振荡代表嗅球内局部网络的活动,而β振荡代表全系统网络的参与。在此,我们利用先前认为分别有利于β或γ振荡的“是/否”任务和二选一任务的不同要求,来测试β和γ振荡是否代表不同的认知模式。我们整合了先前的研究并表明,β和γ振荡在这两个任务中均会出现,γ在早期气味采样期(2 - 4次嗅闻)占主导,而β在后期占主导。两种振荡的相对功率和相干性分别取决于两个任务中的多个因素,不同任务之间没有类别差异。虽然早期/与γ相关的时期在所有试验中都会出现,但大鼠在没有后期/与β相关的时期时也能表现出高于随机水平的成绩。更长时间的采样,包括β振荡,与更好的表现相关。因此,γ后接β振荡代表了气味辨别过程中一系列的认知和神经状态,这可以根据任务和气味辨别的要求分别进行调整。此外,快速(85赫兹)和慢速(70赫兹)的嗅球γ振荡子带分别被假设代表簇状细胞和僧帽细胞网络(真锅和森,2013年)。我们发现快速γ有利于早期,而慢速γ有利于后期(以β为主导的)气味采样期,并且这些振荡的相对贡献在不同任务中是一致的。
局部场电位的嗅觉系统γ(40 - 110赫兹)和β(15 - 35赫兹)振荡表明了不同的神经放电统计和功能回路。我们表明,在联想任务的气味采样过程中,γ和β振荡按刻板序列出现,局部γ在气味嗅闻的前250毫秒占主导,随后在准备行为反应时全系统的β占主导。脑区之间的振荡和耦合强度受任务、气味和学习的调节,表明任务特征可以显著调整皮质感觉系统的动态,该系统每隔约250毫秒就会改变状态。即使在生物物理层面理解皮质回路,也依赖于对多种行为背景和刺激的谨慎运用。