Suppr超能文献

蒽环类和紫杉烷类预处理的转移性乳腺癌联合治疗与单药治疗的荟萃分析:来自9项随机III期试验的结果

A meta-analysis of combination therapy versus single-agent therapy in anthracycline- and taxane-pretreated metastatic breast cancer: results from nine randomized Phase III trials.

作者信息

Xu Liang, Wu Xiaobo, Hu Chun, Zhang Zhiying, Zhang Le, Liang Shujing, Xu Yingchun, Zhang Fengchun

机构信息

Department of Oncology, Suzhou Kowloon Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Suzhou; Department of Oncology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai.

Prevention and Cure Center of Breast Disease, Third Hospital of Nanchang, Nanchang.

出版信息

Onco Targets Ther. 2016 Jul 4;9:4061-74. doi: 10.2147/OTT.S101423. eCollection 2016.

Abstract

Nowadays, the philosophy of treating metastatic breast cancer (MBC) is slowly evolving. Especially for the anthracycline- and taxane-pretreated MBC patients, no standard therapy exists in this setting. Whether to choose doublet agents or single agent as salvage treatment remains fiercely debated. Thus, we conducted a meta-analysis to resolve this problem. Databases including PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane library were searched for Phase III randomized clinical trials (published before August 2015) comparing the efficacy and adverse effects between the combination therapy and single-agent therapy in anthracycline- and taxane-pretreated MBC patients. The primary end point was the overall survival (OS), and the secondary end points were the progression-free survival (PFS), overall response rate (ORR), and grade 3 or 4 toxicities. The pooled hazard ratio (HR) and pooled risk ratio (RR) were used to evaluate the efficacy. Analyses were also performed to estimate the side effects and safety of both groups. In all, nine eligible randomized clinical trials were included in this meta-analysis. Improvements were proven in the doublet agents group on OS (HR 0.90, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.84-0.96, P=0.002), PFS (HR 0.81, 95% CI 0.76-0.88, P<0.001), and ORR (RR 1.72, 95% CI 1.34-2.21, P<0.001). Notably, subgroup analysis failed to favor the targeted agent-based combination in terms of OS (HR 1.08, 95% CI 0.89-1.31, P=0.365), PFS (HR 1.09, 95% CI 0.88-1.35, P=0.433), and ORR (RR 1.60, 95% CI 0.69-3.71, P=0.278) compared with single agent. In addition, although more hematological and gastrointestinal toxicities were observed in the doublet agents group, they were acceptable and manageable. Taken together, when compared with single-agent therapy, doublet agents should be considered a treatment option because of the superior efficacy and the manageable safety profile for the prior anthracycline- and taxane-treated MBC patients.

摘要

如今,转移性乳腺癌(MBC)的治疗理念正在缓慢演变。特别是对于接受过蒽环类和紫杉烷类预处理的MBC患者,在这种情况下尚无标准治疗方案。在挽救性治疗中,选择双联药物还是单药治疗仍存在激烈争论。因此,我们进行了一项荟萃分析以解决这个问题。检索了包括PubMed、EMBASE和Cochrane图书馆在内的数据库,查找2015年8月之前发表的III期随机临床试验,比较蒽环类和紫杉烷类预处理的MBC患者联合治疗与单药治疗的疗效和不良反应。主要终点是总生存期(OS),次要终点是无进展生存期(PFS)、总缓解率(ORR)和3级或4级毒性。采用合并风险比(HR)和合并比值比(RR)评估疗效。还进行了分析以估计两组的副作用和安全性。本荟萃分析共纳入9项符合条件的随机临床试验。结果证明,双联药物组在OS(HR 0.90,95%置信区间[CI] 0.84 - 0.96,P = 0.002)、PFS(HR 0.81,95% CI 0.76 - 0.88,P < 0.001)和ORR(RR 1.72,95% CI 1.34 - 2.21,P < 0.001)方面有改善。值得注意的是,亚组分析在OS(HR 1.08,95% CI 0.89 - 1.31,P = 0.365)、PFS(HR 1.09,95% CI 0.88 - 1.35,P = 0.433)和ORR(RR 1.60,95% CI 0.69 - 3.71,P = 0.278)方面,与单药治疗相比,未显示基于靶向药物的联合治疗更具优势。此外,虽然双联药物组观察到更多血液学和胃肠道毒性,但这些毒性是可接受且可管理的。综上所述,与单药治疗相比,对于先前接受过蒽环类和紫杉烷类治疗的MBC患者,双联药物应被视为一种治疗选择,因为其疗效更优且安全性可管理。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/89f4/4938138/c19645133d6c/ott-9-4061Fig1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验